Power Asymmetries of eHumanities Infrastructures

Max Kemman
{"title":"Power Asymmetries of eHumanities Infrastructures","authors":"Max Kemman","doi":"10.1109/eScience.2018.00103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital research infrastructures simultaneously enable and confine the research practices of scholars, constituting a power relation. This power relation can be characterised as a power asymmetry, with scholars dependent on the developers of infrastructures. In order to reduce this power asymmetry, infrastructures are developed in collaboration between scholars and computational researchers. Through an analysis of over twenty interviews, I will investigate the role of knowledge asymmetry, the ignorance of how a collaborator performs their tasks, and how this relates to power asymmetry in eScience collaborations in digital history. I will moreover consider how these asymmetries pose a challenge in the development and adoption of research infrastructures in the humanities.","PeriodicalId":6476,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science)","volume":"85 1","pages":"370-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2018.00103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital research infrastructures simultaneously enable and confine the research practices of scholars, constituting a power relation. This power relation can be characterised as a power asymmetry, with scholars dependent on the developers of infrastructures. In order to reduce this power asymmetry, infrastructures are developed in collaboration between scholars and computational researchers. Through an analysis of over twenty interviews, I will investigate the role of knowledge asymmetry, the ignorance of how a collaborator performs their tasks, and how this relates to power asymmetry in eScience collaborations in digital history. I will moreover consider how these asymmetries pose a challenge in the development and adoption of research infrastructures in the humanities.
人文基础设施的权力不对称
数字化研究基础设施在促进和制约学者研究实践的同时,构成了一种权力关系。这种权力关系可以被描述为一种权力不对称,学者依赖于基础设施的开发商。为了减少这种权力不对称,基础设施是由学者和计算研究人员合作开发的。通过对20多个访谈的分析,我将调查知识不对称的作用,对合作者如何执行任务的无知,以及这与数字历史中eScience合作中的权力不对称的关系。此外,我将考虑这些不对称如何对人文学科研究基础设施的发展和采用构成挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信