Moral obligation for recycling among youth: extended models of the theory of planned behaviour

IF 3.5 Q2 BUSINESS
Subrahmanyam Annamdevula, S. Nudurupati, R. P. Pappu, Ranendra Sinha
{"title":"Moral obligation for recycling among youth: extended models of the theory of planned behaviour","authors":"Subrahmanyam Annamdevula, S. Nudurupati, R. P. Pappu, Ranendra Sinha","doi":"10.1108/yc-05-2022-1520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to extend the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) model to explain youth’s recycling behavioural intentions in India. Perceived moral obligation (PMO) to perform such pro-environmental activities is incorporated in the TPB model. The study also aims to validate the extended version of TPB models with direct and indirect relationships and identify the best competing model among original TPB, extended TPB model “Model A” (moral obligation is an explanatory variable to recycling behaviour) and extended TPB model “Model B” (moral obligation as an explanatory variable to attitude, perceived behavioural control [PBC] and recycling behavioural intentions; and responsive variable to subjective norms) to predict Indian youth’s waste recycling behaviour.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe descriptive study adopted a hypo-deductive research design to test the proposed extended TPB models. The study used a survey research design with a structured questionnaire. A sample of 782 youth with a mean age of 18 was obtained to perform the correlational analysis. The scale validity and reliability are measured using structural equation modelling and identified the robust model with higher explanatory power using the Chi-square difference (Δχ2) statistic test.\n\n\nFindings\nResults show that the extended TPB model “Model B” has a better fit and explanatory power than competing models to predict the waste recycling behaviour of youth. Further findings substantiate that PMO has a higher indirect effect on recycling intention. Model B supports the utility of moral obligation and its association with youth’s higher waste recycling intention and actual recycling behaviour.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study considers solid waste recycling in general, and therefore future research should test the proposed model specific to other household wastes like water recycling. Furthermore, future studies can experiment with the model with additional variables like perceived relative benefits, social benefits, self-efficacy and education level of the respondents. In a strict sense, the research concern the respondents and the generalisation to a broader population should be made with caution. Hence, further studies in various geographical areas with larger sample sizes would allow the generalizability of the results.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis research provides insights into PMO and its influence on recycling intention. Promoting waste recycling behaviour through campaigns, social pressure and accepting the phenomena of “significant others” will encourage better waste recycling behavioural purposes. Indian households who are highly concerned and obliged towards environmental protection would develop favourable attitudes and subjective norms towards waste recycling.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe study proved the effect of subjective norms on intentions. This contention explains that recycling mostly happens within the house and is mostly not witnessed by society and friends. Therefore, adopting waste recycling behaviour is not socially acceptable as they are not fully aware of its benefits. Policymakers should create awareness to develop environmental-friendly behaviour through recycling solid waste and develop exclusive campaigns to sensitise the negative impact on the environment.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study’s originality is to test the extended TPB model “Model B”, with PMOs as an additional key variable, which has higher explanatory power to predict the youth’s waste recycling behavioural intentions in the Indian context. PMO found a positive and significant effect on attitude, PBC and recycling behavioural intentions. The higher indirect result of PMO on behavioural purposes through TPB variables indicates the importance of personal moral obligation in pro-environmental behaviour.\n","PeriodicalId":46660,"journal":{"name":"Young Consumers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Young Consumers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-05-2022-1520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to extend the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) model to explain youth’s recycling behavioural intentions in India. Perceived moral obligation (PMO) to perform such pro-environmental activities is incorporated in the TPB model. The study also aims to validate the extended version of TPB models with direct and indirect relationships and identify the best competing model among original TPB, extended TPB model “Model A” (moral obligation is an explanatory variable to recycling behaviour) and extended TPB model “Model B” (moral obligation as an explanatory variable to attitude, perceived behavioural control [PBC] and recycling behavioural intentions; and responsive variable to subjective norms) to predict Indian youth’s waste recycling behaviour. Design/methodology/approach The descriptive study adopted a hypo-deductive research design to test the proposed extended TPB models. The study used a survey research design with a structured questionnaire. A sample of 782 youth with a mean age of 18 was obtained to perform the correlational analysis. The scale validity and reliability are measured using structural equation modelling and identified the robust model with higher explanatory power using the Chi-square difference (Δχ2) statistic test. Findings Results show that the extended TPB model “Model B” has a better fit and explanatory power than competing models to predict the waste recycling behaviour of youth. Further findings substantiate that PMO has a higher indirect effect on recycling intention. Model B supports the utility of moral obligation and its association with youth’s higher waste recycling intention and actual recycling behaviour. Research limitations/implications The study considers solid waste recycling in general, and therefore future research should test the proposed model specific to other household wastes like water recycling. Furthermore, future studies can experiment with the model with additional variables like perceived relative benefits, social benefits, self-efficacy and education level of the respondents. In a strict sense, the research concern the respondents and the generalisation to a broader population should be made with caution. Hence, further studies in various geographical areas with larger sample sizes would allow the generalizability of the results. Practical implications This research provides insights into PMO and its influence on recycling intention. Promoting waste recycling behaviour through campaigns, social pressure and accepting the phenomena of “significant others” will encourage better waste recycling behavioural purposes. Indian households who are highly concerned and obliged towards environmental protection would develop favourable attitudes and subjective norms towards waste recycling. Social implications The study proved the effect of subjective norms on intentions. This contention explains that recycling mostly happens within the house and is mostly not witnessed by society and friends. Therefore, adopting waste recycling behaviour is not socially acceptable as they are not fully aware of its benefits. Policymakers should create awareness to develop environmental-friendly behaviour through recycling solid waste and develop exclusive campaigns to sensitise the negative impact on the environment. Originality/value The study’s originality is to test the extended TPB model “Model B”, with PMOs as an additional key variable, which has higher explanatory power to predict the youth’s waste recycling behavioural intentions in the Indian context. PMO found a positive and significant effect on attitude, PBC and recycling behavioural intentions. The higher indirect result of PMO on behavioural purposes through TPB variables indicates the importance of personal moral obligation in pro-environmental behaviour.
青年循环利用的道德义务:计划行为理论的扩展模型
本研究旨在扩展计划行为理论(TPB)模型来解释印度青少年的回收行为意向。执行这些环保活动的道德义务被纳入城市规划模式。本研究还旨在验证具有直接和间接关系的扩展TPB模型,并确定原始TPB模型、扩展TPB模型“模型A”(道德义务是回收行为的解释变量)和扩展TPB模型“模型B”(道德义务是态度、感知行为控制和回收行为意图的解释变量)之间的最佳竞争模型;以及对主观规范的响应变量)来预测印度年轻人的垃圾回收行为。设计/方法/方法描述性研究采用了假设演绎的研究设计来检验提出的扩展TPB模型。本研究采用结构化问卷的调查研究设计。选取782名平均年龄为18岁的青少年进行相关分析。量表效度和信度采用结构方程模型进行测量,并采用卡方差(Δχ2)统计检验确定具有较高解释力的稳健模型。结果表明,推广的城市规划模型“B模型”在预测青少年垃圾回收行为方面具有较好的拟合性和解释力。进一步的研究发现,项目管理对回收意向有较高的间接影响。模型B支持道德义务的效用及其与青年较高的垃圾回收意愿和实际回收行为的关联。研究的局限/意义本研究考虑的是一般的固体废物回收,因此未来的研究应针对其他家庭废物(如水循环利用)测试所提出的模型。未来的研究可以在模型中加入感知相对利益、社会利益、自我效能感和被调查者的受教育程度等变量进行实验。从严格意义上说,研究关注的受访者和推广到更广泛的人群应该谨慎。因此,在不同地理区域进行更大样本量的进一步研究将使结果具有普遍性。实践意义本研究提供了PMO及其对回收意向的影响。透过运动、社会压力及接受“重要他人”现象,推动废物回收行为,有助促进废物回收行为达到更好的目的。高度关注和有义务保护环境的印度家庭将对废物回收形成有利的态度和主观规范。社会含义研究证明了主观规范对意图的影响。这一论点解释了回收大多发生在家里,而大多不被社会和朋友见证。因此,采取废物回收的行为是不被社会接受的,因为他们没有充分意识到它的好处。决策者应该提高意识,通过回收固体废物来发展对环境友好的行为,并开展专门的运动,使人们认识到对环境的负面影响。独创性/价值本研究的独创性在于检验扩展的TPB模型“模型B”,该模型将pmo作为额外的关键变量,对预测印度背景下青年的废物回收行为意愿具有较高的解释力。PMO对态度、PBC和回收行为意向有显著的正向影响。PMO通过TPB变量对行为目的的间接结果较高,表明个人道德义务在亲环境行为中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Young Consumers
Young Consumers BUSINESS-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信