Lessons Learnt from the use of a Quantitative Risk Based Approach to Manage SIMOPS Activities

Prashanth Ignatius, Saud Al Hammadi, G. Basile
{"title":"Lessons Learnt from the use of a Quantitative Risk Based Approach to Manage SIMOPS Activities","authors":"Prashanth Ignatius, Saud Al Hammadi, G. Basile","doi":"10.2118/197622-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A number of major process industry accidents have involved SIMOPS. Company conducted construction (modifications) activities inside its own plant during the period from November 2017 to May 2018. The Group Risk Acceptability Criteria Guidelines have been defined by Company for the purpose of providing Senior Management with quantitative information about the risk profile during SIMOPS activities and to help them in taking informed decision about the execution strategy to ensure safe operations.\n A DNV-GL Phast based model of the plant has been used to assess the risk level. Using Group Risk guidelines for On-site personnel based on the FN (Frequency – Number of Fatalities) Curve, Company evaluated and compared several SIMOPS options prior to the actual works to identify the optimal manning level and schedule to ensure the overall Group Risk laid in the ALARP region.\n The quantitative risk assessment served as a tool to derive the optimal manning levels and shutdown schedule during the SIMOPS activities. The manning levels were controlled through additional administrative measures to ensure its implementation.\n Moreover, the overall SIMOPS Risk (FN Curve) for the current activity was compared with the risk undertaken during similar previous activities conducted in 2015 and 2016. After the successful completion of the activities, the Risk Assessment was updated to take into consideration the actual manning and schedule inputs for the Pre-Shutdown and Partial Shutdown phases. The actual overall Group Risk (including Pre and Partial Shutdown) was within the Company Group Risk Acceptability Criteria.\n Additionally, valuable Lessons Learned were identified such as purging (with inert gas), rather than just the depressurization of the equipment in the units during Shutdown, can contribute to a significant risk reduction.\n This paper presents a novel approach to evaluate SIMOPS risk on personnel using a Group Risk criteria based on FN Curve. This provides an additional re-assurance to stakeholders involved in the activity to take informed decisions based on a quantitative risk analysis rather than a qualitative assessment.","PeriodicalId":11061,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 11, 2019","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 11, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197622-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A number of major process industry accidents have involved SIMOPS. Company conducted construction (modifications) activities inside its own plant during the period from November 2017 to May 2018. The Group Risk Acceptability Criteria Guidelines have been defined by Company for the purpose of providing Senior Management with quantitative information about the risk profile during SIMOPS activities and to help them in taking informed decision about the execution strategy to ensure safe operations. A DNV-GL Phast based model of the plant has been used to assess the risk level. Using Group Risk guidelines for On-site personnel based on the FN (Frequency – Number of Fatalities) Curve, Company evaluated and compared several SIMOPS options prior to the actual works to identify the optimal manning level and schedule to ensure the overall Group Risk laid in the ALARP region. The quantitative risk assessment served as a tool to derive the optimal manning levels and shutdown schedule during the SIMOPS activities. The manning levels were controlled through additional administrative measures to ensure its implementation. Moreover, the overall SIMOPS Risk (FN Curve) for the current activity was compared with the risk undertaken during similar previous activities conducted in 2015 and 2016. After the successful completion of the activities, the Risk Assessment was updated to take into consideration the actual manning and schedule inputs for the Pre-Shutdown and Partial Shutdown phases. The actual overall Group Risk (including Pre and Partial Shutdown) was within the Company Group Risk Acceptability Criteria. Additionally, valuable Lessons Learned were identified such as purging (with inert gas), rather than just the depressurization of the equipment in the units during Shutdown, can contribute to a significant risk reduction. This paper presents a novel approach to evaluate SIMOPS risk on personnel using a Group Risk criteria based on FN Curve. This provides an additional re-assurance to stakeholders involved in the activity to take informed decisions based on a quantitative risk analysis rather than a qualitative assessment.
使用基于数量风险的方法管理SIMOPS活动的经验教训
许多重大的过程工业事故都涉及SIMOPS。公司在2017年11月至2018年5月期间在自己的工厂内进行了建设(改造)活动。公司制定了集团风险可接受性标准指南,目的是向高级管理层提供SIMOPS活动期间风险概况的定量信息,并帮助他们就执行策略做出明智的决策,以确保安全运营。该核电站的DNV-GL Phast模型已被用于评估风险水平。使用基于FN(频率-死亡人数)曲线的现场人员组风险指南,公司在实际工作之前评估和比较了几个SIMOPS选项,以确定最佳的人员配备水平和时间表,以确保在ALARP区域内放置整体组风险。在SIMOPS活动期间,定量风险评估是得出最佳人员配备水平和停工时间表的工具。通过额外的行政措施来控制人员配备水平,以确保其执行。此外,将当前活动的整体SIMOPS风险(FN曲线)与2015年和2016年进行的类似活动所承担的风险进行了比较。在活动成功完成后,风险评估进行了更新,以考虑到预关井和部分关井阶段的实际人员配置和时间表输入。实际的整体集团风险(包括预停产和部分停产)在公司集团风险可接受标准范围内。此外,还发现了一些宝贵的经验教训,例如在停工期间进行净化(使用惰性气体),而不仅仅是对设备进行降压,可以显著降低风险。本文提出了一种基于FN曲线的群体风险准则来评估SIMOPS人员风险的新方法。这为参与活动的利益相关者提供了额外的保证,使他们能够根据定量风险分析而不是定性评估做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信