Analysis of X-Ray Emission From Source TXS 0506+056 Using Xmm-Newton Observations

Rajendra Neupane, N. Dhital
{"title":"Analysis of X-Ray Emission From Source TXS 0506+056 Using Xmm-Newton Observations","authors":"Rajendra Neupane, N. Dhital","doi":"10.3126/jist.v28i1.53585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report the findings of analysis of X-ray flares in TXS 0506+056 using XMM-Newton data obtained from the maximum likelihood analysis. Two publicly available XMM-Newton X-ray observations for TXS 0506+056 were analyzed to study the spectrum and light curves. The spectrum curves revealed two energy bumps, with the lower energy bump at 0.5 keV and the higher energy bump at 6 keV. For observational IDs 0083960101 and 0083960201, the integrated flux for hard X-ray (2–10 keV) is 1.835  10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1 and 1.813  10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1 with corresponding uncertainty range of (1.754–1.913)  10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1 and (1.490–3.515)  10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1, respectively. The best fit models for X-ray data observations of observational IDs of 0083960101 and 0083960201 were phabs (gaussian+power-law) and Tbabs (gaussian+log-parabola) with reduced chi squared values of 1.56 and 1.05, respectively. A turning point at around 2 keV appeared in the spectrum curve, suggesting that the gaussian model only applies for soft X-ray (0.3–2 keV), while the power law and the log parabola model are the best fit models for hard X-ray (2–10 keV). Observation ID 0850780101 shows that the source TXS 0506+056 has a fractional variability of 1.4 %, while Observation ID 0850780201 shows a higher fractional variability of 3.0 %  which indicates brightness varies over time. A greater disparity in the source's rise time suggests a higher degree of variability in its brightness.","PeriodicalId":16072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hunan Institute of Science and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hunan Institute of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jist.v28i1.53585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We report the findings of analysis of X-ray flares in TXS 0506+056 using XMM-Newton data obtained from the maximum likelihood analysis. Two publicly available XMM-Newton X-ray observations for TXS 0506+056 were analyzed to study the spectrum and light curves. The spectrum curves revealed two energy bumps, with the lower energy bump at 0.5 keV and the higher energy bump at 6 keV. For observational IDs 0083960101 and 0083960201, the integrated flux for hard X-ray (2–10 keV) is 1.835  10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1 and 1.813  10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1 with corresponding uncertainty range of (1.754–1.913)  10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1 and (1.490–3.515)  10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1, respectively. The best fit models for X-ray data observations of observational IDs of 0083960101 and 0083960201 were phabs (gaussian+power-law) and Tbabs (gaussian+log-parabola) with reduced chi squared values of 1.56 and 1.05, respectively. A turning point at around 2 keV appeared in the spectrum curve, suggesting that the gaussian model only applies for soft X-ray (0.3–2 keV), while the power law and the log parabola model are the best fit models for hard X-ray (2–10 keV). Observation ID 0850780101 shows that the source TXS 0506+056 has a fractional variability of 1.4 %, while Observation ID 0850780201 shows a higher fractional variability of 3.0 %  which indicates brightness varies over time. A greater disparity in the source's rise time suggests a higher degree of variability in its brightness.
利用Xmm-Newton观测分析源TXS 0506+056的x射线发射
本文报道了利用XMM-Newton最大似然分析数据对TXS 0506+056中的x射线耀斑进行分析的结果。对TXS 0506+056的两个公开的xmm -牛顿x射线观测数据进行了分析,研究了光谱和光曲线。光谱曲线显示出两个能量凸起,低能量凸起在0.5 keV,高能量凸起在6 keV。对于观测id 0083960101和0083960201,硬x射线(2-10 keV)的积分通量分别为1.835 10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1和1.813 10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1,对应的不确定度范围分别为(1.754-1.913)10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1和(1.490-3.515)10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1。观测id为0083960101和0083960201的x射线数据观测的最佳拟合模型分别为phabs(高斯+幂律)和tabbs(高斯+对数抛物线),卡方值分别为1.56和1.05。光谱曲线在2 keV左右出现拐点,说明高斯模型只适用于软x射线(0.3-2 keV),而幂律模型和对数抛物线模型是硬x射线(2 - 10 keV)的最佳拟合模型。观测ID 0850780101显示源TXS 0506+056的分数变异性为1.4%,而观测ID 0850780201显示更高的分数变异性为3.0%,这表明亮度随时间变化。光源上升时间的较大差异表明其亮度的变化程度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信