КРИТЕРИИ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЦИИ НЕБАКТЕРИАЛЬНОГО И ГЕМАТОГЕННОГО ОСТЕОМИЕЛИТОВ: ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ "СЛУЧАЙ-КОНТРОЛЬ" С ПРОСПЕКТИВНОЙ ВЕРИФИКАЦИЕЙ ИСХОДОВ

Михаил Михайлович Костик, О. Л. Копчак, А. И. Тащилкин, В. И. Зорин, Алексей Сергеевич Малетин, А. Ю. Мушкин
{"title":"КРИТЕРИИ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИАЦИИ НЕБАКТЕРИАЛЬНОГО И ГЕМАТОГЕННОГО ОСТЕОМИЕЛИТОВ: ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ \"СЛУЧАЙ-КОНТРОЛЬ\" С ПРОСПЕКТИВНОЙ ВЕРИФИКАЦИЕЙ ИСХОДОВ","authors":"Михаил Михайлович Костик, О. Л. Копчак, А. И. Тащилкин, В. И. Зорин, Алексей Сергеевич Малетин, А. Ю. Мушкин","doi":"10.15690/VSP.V17I6.1976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background . Patients with haematogenous and non-bacterial osteomyelitis have similar clinical symptoms (pain in the nidus area, soft tissue swelling, fever) and laboratory signs (increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate, leukocyte count, C-reactive protein concentration). The criteria for distinguishing these two states are not determined. Objective . Our aim was to determine diagnostic criteria to differentiate haematogenous and non-bacterial osteomyelitis. Methods . The study included data of patients under the age of 18 years with non-bacterial or haematogenous osteomyelitis hospitalised to two clinical centres from 2009 to 2016. The diagnosis was established and re-verified according to archival data (medical history) and after two years of observation (at least once a year). Clinical, anamnestic and laboratory data (haemoglobin, leukocytes, leukocyte formula, platelets, ESR and C-reactive protein, CRP) as well as the results of radiation diagnostics (X-ray, CT scan, MRI or osteosyntigraphy) obtained at the disease onset were taken into account as potential diagnostic criteria. Results . Out of 145 patients with non-bacterial or haematogenous osteomyelitis, the diagnosis was re-verified in 138, of them non-bacterial osteomyelitis — in 91, haematogenous osteomyelitis — in 47. The following criteria had the highest diagnostic value for establishing cases of non-bacterial osteomyelitis: detection of bone destruction foci surrounded by osteosclerosis area [sensitivity (Se) 1.0; specificity (Sp) 0.79]; absence of fever (Se 0.66; Sp 0.92); the number of bone destruction foci > 1 (Se 0.73; Sp 1.0); CRP 55 mg/L (Se 0.94; Sp 0.73); negative results of bacteriological examination of the material from the bone destruction focus (Se 1.0; Sp 0.67). Conclusion . Diagnostic criteria for differentiation of non-bacterial and haematogenous osteomyelitis have been described. Further research on the efficacy of using these criteria to reduce the risk of diagnostic errors, decrease the diagnostic pause, reduce the risk of non-bacterial osteomyelitis complications is needed.","PeriodicalId":10919,"journal":{"name":"Current Paediatrics","volume":"66 1","pages":"458-464"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15690/VSP.V17I6.1976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background . Patients with haematogenous and non-bacterial osteomyelitis have similar clinical symptoms (pain in the nidus area, soft tissue swelling, fever) and laboratory signs (increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate, leukocyte count, C-reactive protein concentration). The criteria for distinguishing these two states are not determined. Objective . Our aim was to determine diagnostic criteria to differentiate haematogenous and non-bacterial osteomyelitis. Methods . The study included data of patients under the age of 18 years with non-bacterial or haematogenous osteomyelitis hospitalised to two clinical centres from 2009 to 2016. The diagnosis was established and re-verified according to archival data (medical history) and after two years of observation (at least once a year). Clinical, anamnestic and laboratory data (haemoglobin, leukocytes, leukocyte formula, platelets, ESR and C-reactive protein, CRP) as well as the results of radiation diagnostics (X-ray, CT scan, MRI or osteosyntigraphy) obtained at the disease onset were taken into account as potential diagnostic criteria. Results . Out of 145 patients with non-bacterial or haematogenous osteomyelitis, the diagnosis was re-verified in 138, of them non-bacterial osteomyelitis — in 91, haematogenous osteomyelitis — in 47. The following criteria had the highest diagnostic value for establishing cases of non-bacterial osteomyelitis: detection of bone destruction foci surrounded by osteosclerosis area [sensitivity (Se) 1.0; specificity (Sp) 0.79]; absence of fever (Se 0.66; Sp 0.92); the number of bone destruction foci > 1 (Se 0.73; Sp 1.0); CRP 55 mg/L (Se 0.94; Sp 0.73); negative results of bacteriological examination of the material from the bone destruction focus (Se 1.0; Sp 0.67). Conclusion . Diagnostic criteria for differentiation of non-bacterial and haematogenous osteomyelitis have been described. Further research on the efficacy of using these criteria to reduce the risk of diagnostic errors, decrease the diagnostic pause, reduce the risk of non-bacterial osteomyelitis complications is needed.
非细菌和血肿性骨髓炎区别的标准:“病例控制”研究,结果验证
背景。血源性和非细菌性骨髓炎患者具有相似的临床症状(病灶区疼痛、软组织肿胀、发热)和实验室体征(红细胞沉降率、白细胞计数、c反应蛋白浓度升高)。区分这两种状态的标准尚未确定。目标。我们的目的是确定诊断标准,以区分血源性和非细菌性骨髓炎。方法。该研究纳入了2009年至2016年在两个临床中心住院的18岁以下非细菌性或血液性骨髓炎患者的数据。根据档案资料(病史)和两年的观察(每年至少一次)建立并重新验证诊断。在疾病发病时获得的临床、记忆和实验室数据(血红蛋白、白细胞、白细胞配方、血小板、ESR和c反应蛋白,CRP)以及放射诊断结果(x射线、CT扫描、MRI或骨造影术)被视为潜在的诊断标准。结果。在145例非细菌性或血髓炎患者中,有138例再次确诊为非细菌性骨髓炎,其中91例为非细菌性骨髓炎,47例为血髓炎。以下标准对非细菌性骨髓炎的诊断价值最高:检测骨破坏灶周围的骨硬化区[敏感性(Se) 1.0;特异性(Sp) 0.79];无发热(Se 0.66;0.92 Sp);骨破坏灶数> 1个(Se 0.73;1.0 Sp);CRP 55 mg/L (Se 0.94;0.73 Sp);骨破坏灶材料细菌学检查阴性(Se 1.0;0.67 Sp)。结论。非细菌性和血源性骨髓炎的鉴别诊断标准已被描述。需要进一步研究使用这些标准在降低诊断错误风险、减少诊断停顿、降低非细菌性骨髓炎并发症风险方面的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信