Systematic Review of Fecal and Mucosa-Associated Microbiota Compositional Shifts in Colorectal Cancer

M. Marzban, Sara Kashefian Naeeini, Arash Ghazbani, Z. Karimi
{"title":"Systematic Review of Fecal and Mucosa-Associated Microbiota Compositional Shifts in Colorectal Cancer","authors":"M. Marzban, Sara Kashefian Naeeini, Arash Ghazbani, Z. Karimi","doi":"10.30476/ACRR.2020.46747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Gut microbiota is a major component of the intestinal luminal environment and plays important roles in colorectal cancer. Object: systematically review all the existing literature on the association of mucosa-associated and fecal microbiota with incidence, location, and stage of colorectal adenoma and carcinoma. Methods: The scientific search was done up to July 2018. The search was limited to the English language with predefined and proper keywords. Among 616 articles some of them were eliminated due to some reasons. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. In the next step two reviewers (M.M and Z.K) independently scanned the titles of all retrieved articles, removed duplicates, and identified potentially relevant abstracts for further assessment. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the Quality was used for quality control. Result: Finally, 54 articles were entered into the study. Fusobacteria 39 (72%), Firmicutes 22(40%), Bacteroidetes 20 (37%), Proteobacteria 15(27%), Actinobacteria 10(18%) was the most prevalent phylum which was found in colorectal cancer patients. Among these taxa some of them were increased in colorectal cancer patients compared to the control; on the other hand, some taxon was declined in colorectal cancer patients. Besides this, in some taxon there were controversies among articles. Conclusion: Early detection of CRC is essential because patients whose cancer are detected at an early stage have more chance of survival. Until now there are several studies have demonstrated the potential rule of gut microbiota to be used for detection of CRC, but there is not any predefining protocol for screening. Although we found lots of articles which were published in this area, for defining a precise microbiota profile we need large multicenter case-control studies, where can show the effect of most important confounding factors like nutrition, ethnicity, physical activity, smoking consumption, and genetic background.","PeriodicalId":8370,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Colorectal Research","volume":"61 1","pages":"41-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Colorectal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/ACRR.2020.46747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Gut microbiota is a major component of the intestinal luminal environment and plays important roles in colorectal cancer. Object: systematically review all the existing literature on the association of mucosa-associated and fecal microbiota with incidence, location, and stage of colorectal adenoma and carcinoma. Methods: The scientific search was done up to July 2018. The search was limited to the English language with predefined and proper keywords. Among 616 articles some of them were eliminated due to some reasons. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. In the next step two reviewers (M.M and Z.K) independently scanned the titles of all retrieved articles, removed duplicates, and identified potentially relevant abstracts for further assessment. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the Quality was used for quality control. Result: Finally, 54 articles were entered into the study. Fusobacteria 39 (72%), Firmicutes 22(40%), Bacteroidetes 20 (37%), Proteobacteria 15(27%), Actinobacteria 10(18%) was the most prevalent phylum which was found in colorectal cancer patients. Among these taxa some of them were increased in colorectal cancer patients compared to the control; on the other hand, some taxon was declined in colorectal cancer patients. Besides this, in some taxon there were controversies among articles. Conclusion: Early detection of CRC is essential because patients whose cancer are detected at an early stage have more chance of survival. Until now there are several studies have demonstrated the potential rule of gut microbiota to be used for detection of CRC, but there is not any predefining protocol for screening. Although we found lots of articles which were published in this area, for defining a precise microbiota profile we need large multicenter case-control studies, where can show the effect of most important confounding factors like nutrition, ethnicity, physical activity, smoking consumption, and genetic background.
结直肠癌中粪便和粘膜相关微生物群组成变化的系统综述
肠道菌群是肠腔环境的重要组成部分,在结直肠癌中起着重要作用。目的:系统回顾现有关于粘膜相关菌群和粪便菌群与结直肠腺瘤和癌的发病、部位、分期的关系的文献。方法:科学检索至2018年7月。搜索仅限于具有预定义和适当关键字的英语语言。在616篇文章中,有一些由于某些原因被淘汰了。确定纳入和排除标准。在接下来的步骤中,两位审稿人(M.M和Z.K)独立地扫描了所有检索到的文章的标题,删除了重复的内容,并确定了潜在的相关摘要以供进一步评估。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评定量表(NOS)进行质量控制。结果:最终有54篇文章被纳入研究。结直肠癌患者中最常见的门是梭菌门39(72%)、厚壁菌门22(40%)、拟杆菌门20(37%)、变形菌门15(27%)、放线菌门10(18%)。在这些分类群中,有些在结直肠癌患者中与对照组相比有所增加;另一方面,结直肠癌患者中一些分类群出现了下降。除此之外,在某些分类单元中,文章之间还存在争议。结论:早期发现结直肠癌至关重要,因为早期发现的患者有更大的生存机会。到目前为止,已经有几项研究证明了肠道微生物群的潜在规则可用于检测CRC,但没有任何预先确定的筛查方案。尽管我们在这一领域找到了许多发表的文章,但为了确定精确的微生物群概况,我们需要大型多中心病例对照研究,其中可以显示最重要的混杂因素,如营养、种族、体育活动、吸烟消费和遗传背景的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信