Which essential oil is better for hygienic massage practice?

N. Donoyama, Y. Ichiman
{"title":"Which essential oil is better for hygienic massage practice?","authors":"N. Donoyama,&nbsp;Y. Ichiman","doi":"10.1016/j.ijat.2005.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>We examined whether it was possible to practice hygienic massage by using six essential oils (eucalyptus, lavender, niaouli, sage, tea tree, and thyme linalool) that in previous studies or anecdotally have been found to have antibacterial effects. First, to determine the inhibitory properties of the six essential oils against 4.80</span> <!-->×<!--> <!-->10<sup>5</sup><span> colony forming units (CFU) of strain ATCC-25923 of </span><span><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em></span><span>, we used a disc method to measure the inhibition zones. Niaouli and eucalyptus<span> showed higher growth inhibitory effects. We then examined the results of using these two essential oils in seven different massage sessions. The niaouli and eucalyptus were each diluted to 1%, 3%, or 6% v/v with jojoba oil base and jojoba oil without any essential oil was used as a control. Bacterial samples were taken from the therapist’s palms and the subject’s skin, and the surviving bacteria were counted.</span></span></p><p>The antibacterial effects were correlated in vitro with the concentration of the essential oil and massage sessions with niaouli oil were more hygienic than those with eucalyptus oil.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100691,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Aromatherapy","volume":"16 3","pages":"Pages 175-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijat.2005.10.006","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Aromatherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962456205000652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We examined whether it was possible to practice hygienic massage by using six essential oils (eucalyptus, lavender, niaouli, sage, tea tree, and thyme linalool) that in previous studies or anecdotally have been found to have antibacterial effects. First, to determine the inhibitory properties of the six essential oils against 4.80 × 105 colony forming units (CFU) of strain ATCC-25923 of Staphylococcus aureus, we used a disc method to measure the inhibition zones. Niaouli and eucalyptus showed higher growth inhibitory effects. We then examined the results of using these two essential oils in seven different massage sessions. The niaouli and eucalyptus were each diluted to 1%, 3%, or 6% v/v with jojoba oil base and jojoba oil without any essential oil was used as a control. Bacterial samples were taken from the therapist’s palms and the subject’s skin, and the surviving bacteria were counted.

The antibacterial effects were correlated in vitro with the concentration of the essential oil and massage sessions with niaouli oil were more hygienic than those with eucalyptus oil.

哪种精油更适合卫生按摩?
我们研究了是否有可能通过使用六种精油(桉树、薰衣草、牛油、鼠尾草、茶树和百里香芳樟醇)来进行卫生按摩,这些精油在以前的研究中或传闻中被发现具有抗菌作用。首先,为了确定6种精油对金黄色葡萄球菌ATCC-25923菌株4.80 × 105菌落形成单位(CFU)的抑制性能,我们采用圆盘法测定了抑制区。牛梨和桉树表现出较强的生长抑制作用。然后,我们检查了在七个不同的按摩过程中使用这两种精油的结果。将牛油和桉树分别用荷荷巴油基稀释至1%、3%或6% v/v,以不含任何精油的荷荷巴油为对照。从治疗师的手掌和受试者的皮肤上提取细菌样本,并对存活的细菌进行计数。体外抑菌效果与精油浓度相关,用牛油按摩比用桉树油按摩更卫生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信