Empowering Smallholder Farmers through Farmer Organizations: Insights from Kenya and Burkina Faso

Eli Wortmann-Kolundzija
{"title":"Empowering Smallholder Farmers through Farmer Organizations: Insights from Kenya and Burkina Faso","authors":"Eli Wortmann-Kolundzija","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3498199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The market-driven agricultural transformation of the global food system requires all, directly and indirectly, participating actors to compete efficiently and to adapt to changes in consumer demand and buyer requirements. Regarding product quantity and quality, smallholders, in particular, have to increase their reliability in order to be able to compete within the agricultural markets. Thus, innovative institutions are needed that integrate and strengthen the sustainability and linkage of and between each technological, economic, social, or political component of the value chain in order to (further) include smallholder farmers within the transforming food system. By adapting their approach and service portfolio both to changing market requirements and to scientific findings from empowerment research, farmer organizations (FO) could become one of the innovative key actors, increasing the competitiveness of their members SMEs' and reducing poverty, its impacts and its costs. \n \nThe aim of this study is, on the one hand, to empirically test the previously constructed theoretical concept of empowerment and the applicability of the developed measuring scale. On the other hand, the study compares the current empowerment approaches of the surveyed FOs, in order to show by means of best practices, but also weak points, how applied empowerment approaches can be transferred and improved in the future. \n \nTheory-wise, the term \"empowerment\" is placed between the discussions of \"repositioning\" according to Bourdieu, the question of distribution and exercising economic, social, and political power according to Sen and recent findings from behavioral science on the changeability of mental models and thus behavior. By putting the theoretical findings into relation and into the context of agricultural development, the results are integrated into the broader discourse of reducing poverty and hunger. Thus, the overall objective of this study is to support the applied empowerment research and the interdisciplinary discourse on poverty and hunger reduction with some impulses for its further advancement.","PeriodicalId":7501,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3498199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

The market-driven agricultural transformation of the global food system requires all, directly and indirectly, participating actors to compete efficiently and to adapt to changes in consumer demand and buyer requirements. Regarding product quantity and quality, smallholders, in particular, have to increase their reliability in order to be able to compete within the agricultural markets. Thus, innovative institutions are needed that integrate and strengthen the sustainability and linkage of and between each technological, economic, social, or political component of the value chain in order to (further) include smallholder farmers within the transforming food system. By adapting their approach and service portfolio both to changing market requirements and to scientific findings from empowerment research, farmer organizations (FO) could become one of the innovative key actors, increasing the competitiveness of their members SMEs' and reducing poverty, its impacts and its costs. The aim of this study is, on the one hand, to empirically test the previously constructed theoretical concept of empowerment and the applicability of the developed measuring scale. On the other hand, the study compares the current empowerment approaches of the surveyed FOs, in order to show by means of best practices, but also weak points, how applied empowerment approaches can be transferred and improved in the future. Theory-wise, the term "empowerment" is placed between the discussions of "repositioning" according to Bourdieu, the question of distribution and exercising economic, social, and political power according to Sen and recent findings from behavioral science on the changeability of mental models and thus behavior. By putting the theoretical findings into relation and into the context of agricultural development, the results are integrated into the broader discourse of reducing poverty and hunger. Thus, the overall objective of this study is to support the applied empowerment research and the interdisciplinary discourse on poverty and hunger reduction with some impulses for its further advancement.
通过农民组织赋予小农权力:来自肯尼亚和布基纳法索的见解
以市场为导向的全球粮食系统农业转型要求所有直接和间接参与的行为体进行有效竞争,并适应消费者需求和买方需求的变化。关于产品的数量和质量,小农尤其必须提高其可靠性,以便能够在农业市场上竞争。因此,需要创新的制度来整合和加强价值链中每个技术、经济、社会或政治组成部分之间的可持续性和联系,以便(进一步)将小农纳入转型中的粮食系统。通过调整其方法和服务组合以适应不断变化的市场需求和赋权研究的科学发现,农民组织(FO)可以成为创新的关键行动者之一,提高其成员中小企业的竞争力,减少贫困及其影响和成本。本研究的目的,一方面是实证检验先前建构的授权理论概念,以及所开发的测量量表的适用性。另一方面,本研究比较了被调查的办公室目前的授权方法,以便通过最佳实践和弱点来展示如何在未来转移和改进已应用的授权方法。从理论上讲,“授权”一词被置于布迪厄的“重新定位”讨论、森的分配和行使经济、社会和政治权力的问题,以及行为科学关于心理模型和行为的可变性的最新发现之间。通过将理论发现与农业发展的关系和背景联系起来,结果被整合到减少贫困和饥饿的更广泛的话语中。因此,本研究的总体目标是支持应用赋权研究和减少贫困与饥饿的跨学科话语,并为其进一步发展提供一些动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信