Case Study on the Calculation of the Earned Value Using the Planned Physical Advancement of Projects

Gentil Filho Isaias
{"title":"Case Study on the Calculation of the Earned Value Using the Planned Physical Advancement of Projects","authors":"Gentil Filho Isaias","doi":"10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/03.13.2022/005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cost knowledge area is one of the pillars of project management, and its control process is fundamental to the success of an enterprise, with the Earned Value Management methodology as one of the most important techniques for project cost management. The Earned Value is the main indicator and variable of the Earned Value Management methodology technique, which aims to enable the integrated understanding of the correlation between cost and physical advancement of projects. The problem identified is that the result of the calculation of the through the ratio between The Planned Cost and Physical Advancement Realized is not always adherent to the reality of the project, being directly influenced by the correlation between the Planned Physical Advance and the Planned Value. The non-use of Planned Physical Advancement with variable for is understood with the gap of systematics, being the basis for meeting the objective of this article, which is to propose a model for calculating the using an Alternative Equation of Earned Value. The methodology used for the work will be case study referring to a basic project of deliveries of technical engineering documentation to an oil rig in Brazil controlled in 2018 and 2019. This research is justified by bringing an important point in the project management literature, being relevant for presenting a scientifically proven alternative equation model for the calculation of Earned Value using Planned Physical Advancement. The method employed contributes to the cost management of projects, since the correct calculation of the Earned Value provides assertive results for decision-making of project managers.","PeriodicalId":31279,"journal":{"name":"Kinerja Journal of Business and Economics","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinerja Journal of Business and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/03.13.2022/005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cost knowledge area is one of the pillars of project management, and its control process is fundamental to the success of an enterprise, with the Earned Value Management methodology as one of the most important techniques for project cost management. The Earned Value is the main indicator and variable of the Earned Value Management methodology technique, which aims to enable the integrated understanding of the correlation between cost and physical advancement of projects. The problem identified is that the result of the calculation of the through the ratio between The Planned Cost and Physical Advancement Realized is not always adherent to the reality of the project, being directly influenced by the correlation between the Planned Physical Advance and the Planned Value. The non-use of Planned Physical Advancement with variable for is understood with the gap of systematics, being the basis for meeting the objective of this article, which is to propose a model for calculating the using an Alternative Equation of Earned Value. The methodology used for the work will be case study referring to a basic project of deliveries of technical engineering documentation to an oil rig in Brazil controlled in 2018 and 2019. This research is justified by bringing an important point in the project management literature, being relevant for presenting a scientifically proven alternative equation model for the calculation of Earned Value using Planned Physical Advancement. The method employed contributes to the cost management of projects, since the correct calculation of the Earned Value provides assertive results for decision-making of project managers.
利用项目计划实物进度计算挣值的案例研究
成本知识领域是项目管理的支柱之一,其控制过程是企业成功的基础,而挣值管理方法是项目成本管理最重要的技术之一。挣值是挣值管理方法技术的主要指标和变量,其目的是使人们能够综合理解成本与项目实际进展之间的相关性。发现的问题是,计划成本与已实现实物进度之比的计算结果并不总是符合项目的实际情况,直接受到计划实物进度与计划价值之间的相关性的影响。从系统学的角度理解不使用变量为的计划物理进度,是实现本文目标的基础,本文的目标是提出一个使用挣值替代方程的计算模型。该工作使用的方法将是一个案例研究,涉及一个基本项目,即在2018年和2019年向巴西的一个石油钻井平台交付技术工程文件。通过引入项目管理文献中的一个重要观点,该研究被证明是合理的,该研究与使用计划物理进展来计算挣值的科学证明的替代方程模型相关。所采用的方法有助于项目的成本管理,因为挣值的正确计算为项目经理的决策提供了自信的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信