Femoral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia in the treatment of saphenous vein ablation

M. Kaçmaz
{"title":"Femoral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia in the treatment of saphenous vein ablation","authors":"M. Kaçmaz","doi":"10.9739/tjvs.2021.1062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citation: Kaçmaz M, Serhatlıoğlu F. Femoral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia in the treatment of saphenous vein ablation. Turk J Vasc Surg 2022;31(1):7-14 ABSTRACT Objectives: This study aims to compare the effects of spinal anesthesia and femoral nerve block and to determine the optimal anesthesia method for embolization of vena saphena magna. Patients and methods: Between December 2019 and March 2021, a total of 160 patients (89 males, 71 females; mean age: 44.4 years; range, 18 to 69 years) who were diagnosed with varicose veins and hospitalized for surgery in our cardiovascular surgery clinic were included. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group (Group S, n=80) underwent spinal anesthesia and the second group (Group F, n=80) underwent femoral nerve block for the surgical operation. Results: The mean arterial pressures (MAPs) were signif icantly lower in Group S compared to Group F. The mean time until surgery was earlier in Group S (4.57±1.0 min vs. 9.9±3.4 min, respectively; p<0.01). The mean duration of motor block was longer in Group S (3.4±1.1 h vs. 2.7±0.8 h, respectively; p<0.05). The mean duration of mobilization was statistically signif icantly shorter in Group F (6.1±1.7 h vs. 5.2±1.4, respectively; p<0.05). The development of urinary retention was statistically signif icantly higher in Group S (p<0.05). The mean patient satisfaction score after discharge was higher in Group F (3.5±0.5 vs. 2.9±0.8, respectively; p<0.05). The incidence of postoperative shivering was statistically signif icantly higher in Group S (p<0.05). Conclusion: Femoral nerve block, which is used for intraoperative anesthesia during the procedure of endovenous laser ablation, can be preferred as an alternative method to spinal anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":23982,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2021.1062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Citation: Kaçmaz M, Serhatlıoğlu F. Femoral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia in the treatment of saphenous vein ablation. Turk J Vasc Surg 2022;31(1):7-14 ABSTRACT Objectives: This study aims to compare the effects of spinal anesthesia and femoral nerve block and to determine the optimal anesthesia method for embolization of vena saphena magna. Patients and methods: Between December 2019 and March 2021, a total of 160 patients (89 males, 71 females; mean age: 44.4 years; range, 18 to 69 years) who were diagnosed with varicose veins and hospitalized for surgery in our cardiovascular surgery clinic were included. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group (Group S, n=80) underwent spinal anesthesia and the second group (Group F, n=80) underwent femoral nerve block for the surgical operation. Results: The mean arterial pressures (MAPs) were signif icantly lower in Group S compared to Group F. The mean time until surgery was earlier in Group S (4.57±1.0 min vs. 9.9±3.4 min, respectively; p<0.01). The mean duration of motor block was longer in Group S (3.4±1.1 h vs. 2.7±0.8 h, respectively; p<0.05). The mean duration of mobilization was statistically signif icantly shorter in Group F (6.1±1.7 h vs. 5.2±1.4, respectively; p<0.05). The development of urinary retention was statistically signif icantly higher in Group S (p<0.05). The mean patient satisfaction score after discharge was higher in Group F (3.5±0.5 vs. 2.9±0.8, respectively; p<0.05). The incidence of postoperative shivering was statistically signif icantly higher in Group S (p<0.05). Conclusion: Femoral nerve block, which is used for intraoperative anesthesia during the procedure of endovenous laser ablation, can be preferred as an alternative method to spinal anesthesia.
股神经阻滞与脊髓麻醉治疗隐静脉消融的比较
引用本文:kamaz M, Serhatlıoğlu F.股神经阻滞与脊髓麻醉治疗隐静脉消融的比较。【摘要】目的:本研究旨在比较脊髓麻醉与股神经阻滞的效果,确定大隐静脉栓塞的最佳麻醉方法。患者和方法:2019年12月至2021年3月,共160例患者(男89例,女71例;平均年龄:44.4岁;年龄在18岁到69岁之间),被诊断为静脉曲张并在我们的心血管外科诊所住院接受手术的患者被纳入研究范围。患者被分为两组。第一组(S组,n=80)行脊髓麻醉,第二组(F组,n=80)行股神经阻滞手术。结果:S组平均动脉压(MAPs)明显低于f组,S组平均手术时间更早(分别为4.57±1.0 min和9.9±3.4 min);p < 0.01)。S组运动阻滞的平均持续时间更长(分别为3.4±1.1 h和2.7±0.8 h);p < 0.05)。F组平均活动时间较短,分别为6.1±1.7 h和5.2±1.4 h;p < 0.05)。S组尿潴留发生率明显高于对照组(p<0.05)。F组患者出院后平均满意度得分较高(分别为3.5±0.5比2.9±0.8);p < 0.05)。S组患者术后寒战发生率明显高于对照组(p<0.05)。结论:在静脉内激光消融术中应用股神经阻滞麻醉可作为脊髓麻醉的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信