Hidden Heretics: Jewish Doubt in the Digital Age by Ayala Fader (review)

IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY
A. Lieber
{"title":"Hidden Heretics: Jewish Doubt in the Digital Age by Ayala Fader (review)","authors":"A. Lieber","doi":"10.1353/ajs.2022.0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"chapter of the volume, Newfield considers the strategies that exiters invoke to manage their liminality in maintaining relationships with family members who remain in the ultraOrthodox community. Two of the most complex strategies involve “a conspiracy of silence,” in which exiters, and often their families, deliberately avoid any discussion of changes in practice or belief systems; and “drawing lines in the sand,” moments when there are explicit negotiations about issues that either side determines to be nonnegotiable, such as marrying a nonJew. In these two chapters, the project’s originality, impact, and sense of purpose solidifies. Some areas need more attention in the volume. The most significant of them is the role of gender—how it informs responses to the questions posed by Newfield to his subjects and, indeed, more broadly, how gender plays in the exiting experience overall. Despite this lacuna, the book offers a persuasive and significant interpretation of an increasingly visible phenomenon. Newfield’s overall argument is elegant, powerful, and persuasive: no linear model of religious exiting exists. His research uncovers patterns, gestures, and habits that define and mark shifts away from ultraOrthodoxy even as they illuminate forms of recovering and maintaining earlier practices.","PeriodicalId":54106,"journal":{"name":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","volume":"88 1","pages":"445 - 447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2022.0069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

chapter of the volume, Newfield considers the strategies that exiters invoke to manage their liminality in maintaining relationships with family members who remain in the ultraOrthodox community. Two of the most complex strategies involve “a conspiracy of silence,” in which exiters, and often their families, deliberately avoid any discussion of changes in practice or belief systems; and “drawing lines in the sand,” moments when there are explicit negotiations about issues that either side determines to be nonnegotiable, such as marrying a nonJew. In these two chapters, the project’s originality, impact, and sense of purpose solidifies. Some areas need more attention in the volume. The most significant of them is the role of gender—how it informs responses to the questions posed by Newfield to his subjects and, indeed, more broadly, how gender plays in the exiting experience overall. Despite this lacuna, the book offers a persuasive and significant interpretation of an increasingly visible phenomenon. Newfield’s overall argument is elegant, powerful, and persuasive: no linear model of religious exiting exists. His research uncovers patterns, gestures, and habits that define and mark shifts away from ultraOrthodoxy even as they illuminate forms of recovering and maintaining earlier practices.
《隐藏的异端:数字时代的犹太人疑惑》作者:阿亚拉·费德(Ayala Fader)
在这本书的第1章中,纽菲尔德考虑了退出者在与留在极端正统社区的家庭成员保持关系时所采用的策略。其中最复杂的两种策略涉及“沉默阴谋”,即退出者及其家人故意避免讨论实践或信仰体系的变化;以及“在沙地上划清界限”的时刻,即双方就任何一方都认为不可谈判的问题进行明确谈判的时刻,比如与非犹太人结婚。在这两章中,项目的原创性、影响力和使命感得以巩固。卷中有些地方需要更多的关注。其中最重要的是性别的作用——它如何影响纽菲尔德向他的研究对象提出的问题的回答,实际上,更广泛地说,性别在整个退出体验中是如何发挥作用的。尽管有这些不足,这本书对一个日益明显的现象提供了一个有说服力和重要的解释。纽菲尔德的整体论点是优雅、有力和有说服力的:不存在宗教存在的线性模型。他的研究揭示了模式、手势和习惯,这些模式、手势和习惯定义和标志着从极端正统的转变,即使它们阐明了恢复和维持早期实践的形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信