{"title":"The significance of the Ljubljana Maska Journal (1920/21) in the context of the Yugoslav avant-garde","authors":"Kristina Pranjić","doi":"10.5937/zbaku2109111p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to the publications of Ljubomir Micić and Branko Ve Poljanski in Maska, the Ljubljana performing arts journal from 1920. While with his engagement in Maska Micić primarily wanted to present himself as a writer outside Zagreb (first, he published in Maska a review of the play Anfisa, and then his own play Istočni Greh was reviewed), Poljanski used his engagement in Maska for a polemic with Ljubljana critics, to later continue his critical response to Ljubljana's artistic milieu in his journal Svetokret, as well as in Zenit. Moreover, one of Poljanski's main motives for publishing an independent journal in Ljubljana was the continuation of the polemic he had started in Maska. Therefore, this article presents the assumption that for a complete genealogy of the beginnings of cooperation between Slovenian avantgarde and representatives of Yugoslav zenithism, it is necessary to take into account Maska, although it was not considered a revolutionary or avant-garde journal. Yet, its aspiration to become international and its openness to different languages and polemics contributed to the exchange of opinions about art and criticism of the time, which was a fruitful ground for the development of relations between various representatives of the Yugoslav avant-garde and their independent actions.","PeriodicalId":31481,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zbaku2109111p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the publications of Ljubomir Micić and Branko Ve Poljanski in Maska, the Ljubljana performing arts journal from 1920. While with his engagement in Maska Micić primarily wanted to present himself as a writer outside Zagreb (first, he published in Maska a review of the play Anfisa, and then his own play Istočni Greh was reviewed), Poljanski used his engagement in Maska for a polemic with Ljubljana critics, to later continue his critical response to Ljubljana's artistic milieu in his journal Svetokret, as well as in Zenit. Moreover, one of Poljanski's main motives for publishing an independent journal in Ljubljana was the continuation of the polemic he had started in Maska. Therefore, this article presents the assumption that for a complete genealogy of the beginnings of cooperation between Slovenian avantgarde and representatives of Yugoslav zenithism, it is necessary to take into account Maska, although it was not considered a revolutionary or avant-garde journal. Yet, its aspiration to become international and its openness to different languages and polemics contributed to the exchange of opinions about art and criticism of the time, which was a fruitful ground for the development of relations between various representatives of the Yugoslav avant-garde and their independent actions.
这篇文章是献给Ljubomir micicic和Branko Ve Poljanski在1920年卢布尔雅那表演艺术杂志《Maska》上发表的文章。虽然他在马斯卡的工作主要是想让自己成为萨格勒布以外的作家(首先,他在马斯卡发表了一篇对戏剧《安菲萨》的评论,然后他自己的戏剧《isto尼·格雷》被评论),波尔扬斯基利用他在马斯卡的工作与卢布尔雅那的评论家争论,后来在他的杂志《Svetokret》上继续他对卢布尔雅那艺术环境的批评回应,以及在泽尼特。此外,波尔扬斯基在卢布尔雅那出版独立期刊的主要动机之一是继续他在马斯卡发起的论战。因此,本文提出的假设是,对于斯洛文尼亚先锋派和南斯拉夫天顶主义代表之间合作开始的完整谱系,有必要考虑到马斯卡,尽管它不被认为是革命性或先锋派期刊。然而,它成为国际的愿望和对不同语言和辩论的开放态度促进了对当时艺术和批评的意见交流,这是发展南斯拉夫先锋派各代表及其独立行动之间关系的富有成效的基础。