Development of electronic student worksheets based on toulmin argumentation patterns to improve argumentation skills in basic acid materials

Esa Witri, N. Ngatijo, Muhammad Haris Effendi-Hasibuan
{"title":"Development of electronic student worksheets based on toulmin argumentation patterns to improve argumentation skills in basic acid materials","authors":"Esa Witri, N. Ngatijo, Muhammad Haris Effendi-Hasibuan","doi":"10.24114/jpkim.v12i3.21160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is part of a research project to help improve students' argumentative skills in chemistry subjects. This research is part of the development of argumentation-based teaching materials while other studies have developed learning models, teaching materials and a collection of argumentation questions. The purpose of this research was to determine the process of developing students' e-worksheets, the feasibility of students' e-worksheets based on concept and practitioner perceptions, and the effectiveness of students' e-worksheets that were developed as teaching materials based on the Toulmin argumentation pattern. Product trials were conducted at state senior high schools 11 Jambi City. The results of the practitioner's eligibility based on the teacher's response are in the very good category and students from both groups have a correlation in the \"high\" category. The effectiveness test is seen from the average N-Gain score of the experimental class in the quite effective category. There is a significant difference between the experimental class and the control class which can be seen from the difference in learning outcomes of the experimental class (using students' e-LKS based on the Toulmin argumentation pattern) higher than the control class (not using e-LKS).","PeriodicalId":17697,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v12i3.21160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This research is part of a research project to help improve students' argumentative skills in chemistry subjects. This research is part of the development of argumentation-based teaching materials while other studies have developed learning models, teaching materials and a collection of argumentation questions. The purpose of this research was to determine the process of developing students' e-worksheets, the feasibility of students' e-worksheets based on concept and practitioner perceptions, and the effectiveness of students' e-worksheets that were developed as teaching materials based on the Toulmin argumentation pattern. Product trials were conducted at state senior high schools 11 Jambi City. The results of the practitioner's eligibility based on the teacher's response are in the very good category and students from both groups have a correlation in the "high" category. The effectiveness test is seen from the average N-Gain score of the experimental class in the quite effective category. There is a significant difference between the experimental class and the control class which can be seen from the difference in learning outcomes of the experimental class (using students' e-LKS based on the Toulmin argumentation pattern) higher than the control class (not using e-LKS).
开发基于图尔敏论证模式的电子学生工作表,以提高基本酸性材料的论证技能
这项研究是一个研究项目的一部分,旨在帮助提高学生在化学学科中的辩论能力。本研究是基于论证的教材开发的一部分,而其他研究已经开发了学习模式、教材和论证问题集。本研究的目的是确定开发学生电子工作表的过程,基于概念和从业者感知的学生电子工作表的可行性,以及基于图尔敏论证模式开发的学生电子工作表作为教材的有效性。产品试验在占碑市11所州立高中进行。基于教师反应的从业者资格的结果处于非常好的类别,两组学生在“高”类别中存在相关性。从实验班在相当有效类别的平均N-Gain得分可以看出有效性检验。实验班与对照班之间存在显著差异,这可以从实验班(使用学生基于图尔敏论证模式的e-LKS)的学习成果高于对照班(不使用e-LKS)的差异中看出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信