Transaction Costs in Voluntary Social Organisations

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
M. Clausen
{"title":"Transaction Costs in Voluntary Social Organisations","authors":"M. Clausen","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v15n4p35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing use of targeted social investments has led to relevant research interest in the transaction costs of social efforts. However, the majority of the research is characterised by the following two challenges: first, the analyses are often limited to public sources of revenue and, therefore, exclude private sources; and second, the transaction costs are measured based on self-declared information about administrative costs. \n \nThe article contributes to the field of research in two ways. First, the contribution is made through an analytical model that brings together private and public revenue streams in a single model, providing a unique opportunity to compare the transaction costs from these two sources. Second, in this article, transaction costs are measured based on the actual development in the number of administrative academic full-time equivalents (FTEs) in the organisations. The latter attribute also achieves a better link to the theory in the field, which precisely focuses on administrative employees. \n \nThe article derived data from a longitudinal dataset for 2012‒17 with the accounts for revenue in the nationwide voluntary social organisations and register data from Statistics Denmark on the education and working hours of employees in organisations. The article finds that targeted project funds (that is, earmarked funding) from private sources have significantly higher transaction costs than government project funds and general public operating grants. Smaller organisations were also shown to generally have higher costs when striving to secure funding than larger organisations with economies of scale.","PeriodicalId":37166,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v15n4p35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing use of targeted social investments has led to relevant research interest in the transaction costs of social efforts. However, the majority of the research is characterised by the following two challenges: first, the analyses are often limited to public sources of revenue and, therefore, exclude private sources; and second, the transaction costs are measured based on self-declared information about administrative costs. The article contributes to the field of research in two ways. First, the contribution is made through an analytical model that brings together private and public revenue streams in a single model, providing a unique opportunity to compare the transaction costs from these two sources. Second, in this article, transaction costs are measured based on the actual development in the number of administrative academic full-time equivalents (FTEs) in the organisations. The latter attribute also achieves a better link to the theory in the field, which precisely focuses on administrative employees. The article derived data from a longitudinal dataset for 2012‒17 with the accounts for revenue in the nationwide voluntary social organisations and register data from Statistics Denmark on the education and working hours of employees in organisations. The article finds that targeted project funds (that is, earmarked funding) from private sources have significantly higher transaction costs than government project funds and general public operating grants. Smaller organisations were also shown to generally have higher costs when striving to secure funding than larger organisations with economies of scale.
自愿性社会组织的交易成本
越来越多地使用有针对性的社会投资导致了对社会努力的交易成本的相关研究兴趣。然而,大多数研究的特点是以下两个挑战:首先,分析往往限于公共收入来源,因此排除了私人来源;其次,交易成本是基于自我声明的管理成本信息来衡量的。这篇文章在两个方面对该领域的研究做出了贡献。首先,该贡献是通过一个分析模型做出的,该模型将私人和公共收入流汇集在一个模型中,为比较这两个来源的交易成本提供了一个独特的机会。其次,在本文中,交易成本是根据组织中行政学术专职人员(fte)数量的实际发展来衡量的。后者的属性也与该领域的理论实现了更好的联系,而该领域正是以行政人员为研究对象。本文的数据来自2012-17年的纵向数据集,其中包括全国志愿社会组织的收入账户,以及丹麦统计局关于组织中雇员的教育和工作时间的登记数据。本文发现,来自私人来源的定向项目资金(即专项资金)的交易成本明显高于政府项目资金和一般公共运营赠款。较小的组织在争取获得资金时,通常比具有规模经济的大型组织的成本更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies
International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信