Success Factors of an Enterprise-Wide Digital Twin Strategy

Steve Parvin
{"title":"Success Factors of an Enterprise-Wide Digital Twin Strategy","authors":"Steve Parvin","doi":"10.2118/207248-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While many companies have embarked on their digital transformation journeys implementing different forms of \"Digital Twins\" to cover specific business processes and challenges, their main challenge has been integrating these disparate Digital Twin projects into one single combined view to create significant new value and competitive advantage for the business.\n To be effective, the Digital Twin needs to be capable of supporting the entire asset lifecycle from the early phases of a capital project to operations and maintenance up to asset retirement, leveraging the same data in a platform able to support the end-to-end process.\n This paper looks at several approaches, which large owner operators at different levels of organizational information management maturity have used to build their Enterprise Scale Digital Twin strategies.\n It uses the lessons learned to highlight the successes and failures of these strategies and recommended approaches going forward. The results observed, identify that whilst there is a reasonably standard roadmap for approaching the development of Digital Twins most customers begin at different points along that journey.\n It also highlights that the end goal may not be the same across an Enterprise and that by taking the development of a Digital Twin as a series of incremental steps, independent of the starting point, serves to accelerate the journey by driving an increase in the organizational maturity in terms of People, Process and Technology and an improvement in data quality. One of the key components in any strategy was the ability to manage the information standard for the Digital Twin at an Enterprise level, for both greenfield and brownfield organizations and assets.\n The paper concludes the benefits of technical and commercial scalability and the requirements to get a solid manageable and trustworthy core of information should be at the heart of any Enterprise-wide Digital Twin strategy. This is contrary to the common approach of building a single detailed Proof of Concept (PoC) addressing as many use cases as possible and then templatizing that as an approach to repeat around the Enterprise, which often leads to failure on additional deployments where the maturity and challenges are different.","PeriodicalId":10981,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207248-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While many companies have embarked on their digital transformation journeys implementing different forms of "Digital Twins" to cover specific business processes and challenges, their main challenge has been integrating these disparate Digital Twin projects into one single combined view to create significant new value and competitive advantage for the business. To be effective, the Digital Twin needs to be capable of supporting the entire asset lifecycle from the early phases of a capital project to operations and maintenance up to asset retirement, leveraging the same data in a platform able to support the end-to-end process. This paper looks at several approaches, which large owner operators at different levels of organizational information management maturity have used to build their Enterprise Scale Digital Twin strategies. It uses the lessons learned to highlight the successes and failures of these strategies and recommended approaches going forward. The results observed, identify that whilst there is a reasonably standard roadmap for approaching the development of Digital Twins most customers begin at different points along that journey. It also highlights that the end goal may not be the same across an Enterprise and that by taking the development of a Digital Twin as a series of incremental steps, independent of the starting point, serves to accelerate the journey by driving an increase in the organizational maturity in terms of People, Process and Technology and an improvement in data quality. One of the key components in any strategy was the ability to manage the information standard for the Digital Twin at an Enterprise level, for both greenfield and brownfield organizations and assets. The paper concludes the benefits of technical and commercial scalability and the requirements to get a solid manageable and trustworthy core of information should be at the heart of any Enterprise-wide Digital Twin strategy. This is contrary to the common approach of building a single detailed Proof of Concept (PoC) addressing as many use cases as possible and then templatizing that as an approach to repeat around the Enterprise, which often leads to failure on additional deployments where the maturity and challenges are different.
全企业数字孪生战略的成功因素
虽然许多公司已经开始了他们的数字化转型之旅,实施不同形式的“数字双胞胎”来覆盖特定的业务流程和挑战,但他们的主要挑战是将这些完全不同的数字双胞胎项目集成到一个单一的组合视图中,以为业务创造重要的新价值和竞争优势。为了提高效率,数字孪生需要能够支持整个资产生命周期,从资本项目的早期阶段到运营和维护,再到资产退役,在能够支持端到端流程的平台中利用相同的数据。本文考察了处于不同组织信息管理成熟度水平的大型所有者运营商用于构建其企业规模数字孪生战略的几种方法。它利用吸取的经验教训,强调这些战略的成功和失败,并建议今后采取的方法。观察到的结果表明,虽然有一个合理的标准路线图来接近数字双胞胎的开发,但大多数客户在旅程的不同点开始。它还强调了企业的最终目标可能不尽相同,并且通过将数字孪生的开发作为一系列增量步骤,独立于起点,通过推动人员,流程和技术方面组织成熟度的增加以及数据质量的改进来加速旅程。任何策略的关键组件之一都是能够在企业级管理数字孪生的信息标准,包括未开发的和未开发的组织和资产。本文总结了技术和商业可伸缩性的好处,以及获得可靠的可管理和可信赖的信息核心的需求应该是任何企业范围的数字孪生战略的核心。这与构建单个详细的概念验证(PoC)的常见方法相反,该方法处理尽可能多的用例,然后将其模板化,作为在企业中重复的方法,这通常会导致成熟度和挑战不同的其他部署失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信