Can Chest CT be the first-line diagnostic test in COVID-19? A cross-sectional study

H. Çaylak, D. Atasoy, Nazım Çetinkaya, İsmet Can, Rağıp Sarıismailoğlu, M. Atalar
{"title":"Can Chest CT be the first-line diagnostic test in COVID-19? A cross-sectional study","authors":"H. Çaylak, D. Atasoy, Nazım Çetinkaya, İsmet Can, Rağıp Sarıismailoğlu, M. Atalar","doi":"10.7197/cmj.1164858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT \nBackground/aim: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, chest computerized tomography (CCT) was shown to be more sensitive than real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) in detecting the disease, especially in regions with high disease prevalence. In this study, we aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19. \nMaterials and methods: Between 17 March, 2020 and 25 April, 2020, 2170 patients who were admitted to the hospital for any reason and underwent chest CT scanning were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with a pre-diagnosis of COVID-19 and a positive rRT-PCR test, two consecutive negative rRT-PCR tests, or with a first negative rRT-PCR test and a positive follow-up rRT-PCR test were included. The day of the rRT-PCR test for these patients was counted as day “0,” and 200 patients whose CCT was performed within +/- three days were included in the study. \nResults: Of the 200 patients included in the study, 118 were rRT-PCR-positive, and 82 were rRT-PCR-negative. Of the 118 patients with positive rRT-PCR results, 62/118 (52.5%) had positive CCT scans. With the rRT-PCR results as the reference, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CCT in indicating COVID-19 infection were 52.5% (95% CI 43–61%), 67% (95% CI 56–77%), and 58.5% (95% CI 51-65%), respectively. The negative predictive value of CCT in diagnosing COVID-19 was greater for women than for men (p = 0.01). \nConclusions: In regions where the prevalence of COVID-19 is not high, the use of CCT in the diagnosis of the disease is not an alternative to the rRT-PCR test due to its low sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":10750,"journal":{"name":"Cumhuriyet medical journal","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cumhuriyet medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.1164858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background/aim: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, chest computerized tomography (CCT) was shown to be more sensitive than real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) in detecting the disease, especially in regions with high disease prevalence. In this study, we aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19. Materials and methods: Between 17 March, 2020 and 25 April, 2020, 2170 patients who were admitted to the hospital for any reason and underwent chest CT scanning were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with a pre-diagnosis of COVID-19 and a positive rRT-PCR test, two consecutive negative rRT-PCR tests, or with a first negative rRT-PCR test and a positive follow-up rRT-PCR test were included. The day of the rRT-PCR test for these patients was counted as day “0,” and 200 patients whose CCT was performed within +/- three days were included in the study. Results: Of the 200 patients included in the study, 118 were rRT-PCR-positive, and 82 were rRT-PCR-negative. Of the 118 patients with positive rRT-PCR results, 62/118 (52.5%) had positive CCT scans. With the rRT-PCR results as the reference, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CCT in indicating COVID-19 infection were 52.5% (95% CI 43–61%), 67% (95% CI 56–77%), and 58.5% (95% CI 51-65%), respectively. The negative predictive value of CCT in diagnosing COVID-19 was greater for women than for men (p = 0.01). Conclusions: In regions where the prevalence of COVID-19 is not high, the use of CCT in the diagnosis of the disease is not an alternative to the rRT-PCR test due to its low sensitivity.
胸部CT能成为新冠肺炎的一线诊断手段吗?横断面研究
背景/目的:在COVID-19大流行早期,胸部计算机断层扫描(CCT)在检测疾病方面比实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)更敏感,特别是在疾病高发地区。在本研究中,我们旨在确定胸部CT诊断COVID-19的敏感性和特异性。材料和方法:回顾性分析2020年3月17日至2020年4月25日期间因任何原因入院并行胸部CT扫描的2170例患者。纳入了预诊断为COVID-19且rRT-PCR检测阳性、连续两次rRT-PCR检测阴性或首次rRT-PCR检测阴性且随访rRT-PCR检测阳性的患者。这些患者进行rRT-PCR检测的当天计算为第0天,在+/- 3天内进行CCT的200例患者被纳入研究。结果:纳入研究的200例患者中,118例rrt - pcr阳性,82例rrt - pcr阴性。在118例rRT-PCR结果阳性的患者中,62/118(52.5%)的CCT扫描呈阳性。以rRT-PCR结果为参照,CCT检测COVID-19感染的敏感性为52.5% (95% CI 43 ~ 61%),特异性为67% (95% CI 56 ~ 77%),准确性为58.5% (95% CI 51 ~ 65%)。女性CCT诊断COVID-19的阴性预测值大于男性(p = 0.01)。结论:在COVID-19患病率不高的地区,由于CCT的敏感性较低,不能替代rRT-PCR检测诊断疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信