The precautionary measures clauses in indemnity insurance contract

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
M. V. Kratenko, Luik Olavi-Juri
{"title":"The precautionary measures clauses in indemnity insurance contract","authors":"M. V. Kratenko, Luik Olavi-Juri","doi":"10.21638/spbu14.2022.310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Precautionary measures clauses impose on a policyholder or an insured person the obligation to perform certain acts or to refrain from certain activities until the occurrence of the insured event. Traditionally, the function of preventing negligent behavior by the policyholder is performed by rules on aggravation of risk or policyholder’s fault in the occurrence of the insured event. However, if they are ineffective, for example due to the inability to take into account the negligence in all cases (para 1 of Art. 963 of the RF Civil Code), the insurer is inclined to transfer some of the negligent acts onto the category of insurance exclusions in order not to pay compensation at all. As a consequence, the “all-or-nothing” principle prevails in resolving insurance disputes. The precautionary measures clauses, provided for in the Principles of European Insurance Contract Law (PEICL) and the legislation of Scandinavian countries (Sweden, Finland), makes it possible to reach a compromise: the insurer may consider the negligent behavior of the policyholder when paying compensation, but only insofar as it has affected the occurrence of the insured event or the amount of loss. This is more in line with the “proportionality rule”. In order to ensure the consumer rights, the authors propose to supplement insurance legislation (in particular, Chapter 48 of the RF Civil Code) with the legal institute of precautionary measures on the basis of the relevant rules of the PEICL.","PeriodicalId":41041,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precautionary measures clauses impose on a policyholder or an insured person the obligation to perform certain acts or to refrain from certain activities until the occurrence of the insured event. Traditionally, the function of preventing negligent behavior by the policyholder is performed by rules on aggravation of risk or policyholder’s fault in the occurrence of the insured event. However, if they are ineffective, for example due to the inability to take into account the negligence in all cases (para 1 of Art. 963 of the RF Civil Code), the insurer is inclined to transfer some of the negligent acts onto the category of insurance exclusions in order not to pay compensation at all. As a consequence, the “all-or-nothing” principle prevails in resolving insurance disputes. The precautionary measures clauses, provided for in the Principles of European Insurance Contract Law (PEICL) and the legislation of Scandinavian countries (Sweden, Finland), makes it possible to reach a compromise: the insurer may consider the negligent behavior of the policyholder when paying compensation, but only insofar as it has affected the occurrence of the insured event or the amount of loss. This is more in line with the “proportionality rule”. In order to ensure the consumer rights, the authors propose to supplement insurance legislation (in particular, Chapter 48 of the RF Civil Code) with the legal institute of precautionary measures on the basis of the relevant rules of the PEICL.
赔偿保险合同中的预防措施条款
预防措施条款规定投保人或被保险人在保险事故发生前有义务履行某些行为或避免某些活动。传统上,预防投保人过失行为的功能是通过风险加重规则或投保人在保险事故发生中的过错规则来实现的。但是,如果它们无效,例如由于无法考虑到所有情况下的过失(《俄罗斯民法典》第963条第1款),保险人倾向于将一些过失行为转移到保险除外责任的范畴,以便根本不支付赔偿。因此,“全有或全无”的原则在解决保险纠纷中盛行。欧洲保险合同法原则(PEICL)和斯堪的纳维亚国家(瑞典、芬兰)立法中规定的预防措施条款使得达成妥协成为可能:保险人在支付赔偿时可以考虑投保人的过失行为,但仅限于其影响了保险事件的发生或损失的数额。这更符合“比例规则”。为了保障消费者的权利,作者建议在PEICL相关规则的基础上,以预防措施的法律制度补充保险立法(特别是俄罗斯民法典第48章)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信