Developing competency frameworks using natural language processing: An exploratory study

Andrew N. Garman, Taylor S. Erwin, Tyler R. Garman, Dae Hyun Kim
{"title":"Developing competency frameworks using natural language processing: An exploratory study","authors":"Andrew N. Garman,&nbsp;Taylor S. Erwin,&nbsp;Tyler R. Garman,&nbsp;Dae Hyun Kim","doi":"10.1002/cbe2.1256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Competency models provide useful frameworks for organizing learning and assessment programs, but their construction is both time intensive and subject to perceptual biases. Some aspects of model development may be particularly well-suited to automation, specifically natural language processing (NLP), which could also help make them more generalizable and thus more learner-centric.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we sought to evaluate the potential for NLP techniques be applied to competency framework development.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials &amp; Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using NLP, we developed a set of new competency frameworks from a sample of existing leadership competency models from the health professions (e.g. nursing, medicine, healthcare management, social work, spiritual care). We then arranged for a human reviewer who was blind to the frameworks’ sources to evaluate their relative coherence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The human-developed frameworks tended to be viewed as more coherent than the NLP-generated frameworks, however the coherence advantage was greatest for the least complex models, and there was no apparent advantage in the most complex model we tested.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Although NLP did not consistently outperform the human-developed model structures, the pattern of results suggested directions for further model refinement and future study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Replicating this research with a broader sample of competency models will be important for establishing whether the observed relationship between NLP performance and model size is a more widely generalizable principle.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101234,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1256","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Competency models provide useful frameworks for organizing learning and assessment programs, but their construction is both time intensive and subject to perceptual biases. Some aspects of model development may be particularly well-suited to automation, specifically natural language processing (NLP), which could also help make them more generalizable and thus more learner-centric.

Aims

In this study, we sought to evaluate the potential for NLP techniques be applied to competency framework development.

Materials & Methods

Using NLP, we developed a set of new competency frameworks from a sample of existing leadership competency models from the health professions (e.g. nursing, medicine, healthcare management, social work, spiritual care). We then arranged for a human reviewer who was blind to the frameworks’ sources to evaluate their relative coherence.

Results

The human-developed frameworks tended to be viewed as more coherent than the NLP-generated frameworks, however the coherence advantage was greatest for the least complex models, and there was no apparent advantage in the most complex model we tested.

Discussion

Although NLP did not consistently outperform the human-developed model structures, the pattern of results suggested directions for further model refinement and future study.

Conclusion

Replicating this research with a broader sample of competency models will be important for establishing whether the observed relationship between NLP performance and model size is a more widely generalizable principle.

Abstract Image

利用自然语言处理开发胜任力框架:一项探索性研究
背景能力模型为组织学习和评估项目提供了有用的框架,但其构建既耗时又容易受到感知偏差的影响。模型开发的某些方面可能特别适合于自动化,特别是自然语言处理(NLP),这也可以帮助它们更加一般化,从而更加以学习者为中心。在本研究中,我们试图评估NLP技术应用于能力框架开发的潜力。材料,方法采用NLP方法,从现有的卫生专业(如护理、医学、卫生保健管理、社会工作、精神护理)的领导能力模型样本中开发出一套新的胜任力框架。然后,我们安排了一个不了解框架来源的人类审稿人来评估它们的相对一致性。结果人类开发的框架往往被认为比nlp生成的框架更具连贯性,但连贯性优势在最不复杂的模型中最大,而在我们测试的最复杂的模型中没有明显的优势。尽管NLP并没有始终优于人类开发的模型结构,但结果的模式为进一步的模型改进和未来的研究提供了方向。结论在更广泛的胜任力模型样本中重复这一研究对于确定观察到的NLP绩效与模型大小之间的关系是否是一个更广泛的推广原则将是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信