LEGALITY EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS IMPLEMENTATION BY SHAREHOLDERS

Andhes Tan Satrisna
{"title":"LEGALITY EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS IMPLEMENTATION BY SHAREHOLDERS","authors":"Andhes Tan Satrisna","doi":"10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) is the organ of the company that has the highest authority in the company, and all decisions relating to the company are stipulated through the GMS after certain conditions have been met as stipulated in the laws and regulations. The purpose of this research is to find out the implementation of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS) and the legal consequences of the Implementation of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders organized by PT. KOLINGKAS in terms of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. This study uses normative legal research methods and uses a qualitative approach. As well as using primary, secondary and tertiary sources of legal materials from books, journals, laws and regulations related to the holding of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders. The results of the study show that the legality of holding an EGMS by shareholders can be seen from the legal consequences of holding an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS) held by PT. KOLINGKAS, in holding the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders, the Plaintiff as a Member of the Board of Directors was not given any defense by the Defendants, in this case PT. KLK and also the plan to dismiss the Plaintiff as Director were not notified in advance to the Plaintiff, the implementation was carried out unilaterally, or the directors did not know about it, so that the Plaintiff was dismissed by the EGMS as stated in Deed Number 06 concerning Minutes of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of PT. KLK does not meet the requirements and procedures set out in UUPT and is an unlawful act, then it has violated laws and regulations or it is considered that the decision is legally flawed. So that for fraudulent acts committed by parties within the company, the party conducting the Extraordinary GMS activities can be held liable for civil liability for these actions.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Private Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) is the organ of the company that has the highest authority in the company, and all decisions relating to the company are stipulated through the GMS after certain conditions have been met as stipulated in the laws and regulations. The purpose of this research is to find out the implementation of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS) and the legal consequences of the Implementation of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders organized by PT. KOLINGKAS in terms of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. This study uses normative legal research methods and uses a qualitative approach. As well as using primary, secondary and tertiary sources of legal materials from books, journals, laws and regulations related to the holding of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders. The results of the study show that the legality of holding an EGMS by shareholders can be seen from the legal consequences of holding an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS) held by PT. KOLINGKAS, in holding the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders, the Plaintiff as a Member of the Board of Directors was not given any defense by the Defendants, in this case PT. KLK and also the plan to dismiss the Plaintiff as Director were not notified in advance to the Plaintiff, the implementation was carried out unilaterally, or the directors did not know about it, so that the Plaintiff was dismissed by the EGMS as stated in Deed Number 06 concerning Minutes of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of PT. KLK does not meet the requirements and procedures set out in UUPT and is an unlawful act, then it has violated laws and regulations or it is considered that the decision is legally flawed. So that for fraudulent acts committed by parties within the company, the party conducting the Extraordinary GMS activities can be held liable for civil liability for these actions.
股东临时大会由股东执行的合法性
股东大会是公司的最高权力机构,公司的一切决定都是在符合法律法规规定的一定条件后,由股东大会作出的。本研究的目的是找出执行临时股东大会(EGMS)和执行临时股东大会的法律后果由PT. KOLINGKAS组织的2007年第40号法律关于有限责任公司。本研究采用规范的法律研究方法,并采用定性方法。以及利用与召开临时股东大会有关的书籍、期刊、法律法规等第一手、二手和第三方法律资料。研究结果表明,控股股东的五强的合法性的法律后果可以看到手里拿着一个非同寻常的股东大会(五)由PT。KOLINGKAS,在控股股东特别大会,原告作为董事会的成员由被告没有任何防御,在这种情况下PT。KLK也计划驳回原告作为导演没有提前通知原告,执行是单方面进行的,或者董事不知道,以致原告被EGMS解雇,如第06号契约所述,关于PT的临时股东大会会议记录。KLK不符合UUPT规定的要求和程序,是非法行为,则违反法律法规或认为该决定存在法律缺陷。因此,对于公司内部各方的欺诈行为,进行超常规GMS活动的一方可以对这些行为承担民事责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信