THE VICTIM AS A FORGOTTEN FIGURE IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM – A FEW REMARKS IN THE LIGHT OF PAST FORMS OF PUNISHMENT

Agnieszka Kania
{"title":"THE VICTIM AS A FORGOTTEN FIGURE IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM – A FEW REMARKS IN THE LIGHT OF PAST FORMS OF PUNISHMENT","authors":"Agnieszka Kania","doi":"10.31743/recl.4046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on selected problems regarding the evolution of the punishment process . The starting point remains the assumption that regardless of the historical period, every palpable form of injustice related to a violation of a certain area of goods has resulted in an intervention approved at the given moment in history . The study notes that in the early pre-state period, seeking a remedy for wrongdoing was a private matter of the victim (or their family or clan) who could in that wayavenge on their own the injustice they had suffered . The process of publicising criminal law that began at the end of the Middle Ages has marginalised the process role of a victim in the possibilities to seek the remedy . However, the vertical criminal law relationship has, over time, changed to some extent . The privatisation of the justice system – especially noticeable nowadays – makes it possible to see that consensual methods of resolving conflicts caused by an offence essentially contributed to the reversal of a certain historical process . That reversal was certainly intended to “reveal” the victim, and thus to return the conflict resulting from the offence to its “owners,” i .e . the perpetrator and the victim .","PeriodicalId":20823,"journal":{"name":"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.4046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on selected problems regarding the evolution of the punishment process . The starting point remains the assumption that regardless of the historical period, every palpable form of injustice related to a violation of a certain area of goods has resulted in an intervention approved at the given moment in history . The study notes that in the early pre-state period, seeking a remedy for wrongdoing was a private matter of the victim (or their family or clan) who could in that wayavenge on their own the injustice they had suffered . The process of publicising criminal law that began at the end of the Middle Ages has marginalised the process role of a victim in the possibilities to seek the remedy . However, the vertical criminal law relationship has, over time, changed to some extent . The privatisation of the justice system – especially noticeable nowadays – makes it possible to see that consensual methods of resolving conflicts caused by an offence essentially contributed to the reversal of a certain historical process . That reversal was certainly intended to “reveal” the victim, and thus to return the conflict resulting from the offence to its “owners,” i .e . the perpetrator and the victim .
受害者是司法系统中被遗忘的人物-根据过去的惩罚形式的一些评论
本文重点探讨了刑罚过程演变过程中存在的若干问题。出发点仍然是这样一种假设,即无论历史时期如何,与侵犯某一商品领域有关的每一种明显的不公正形式都会导致在历史上特定时刻批准的干预。该研究指出,在建国前的早期,为不法行为寻求补救是受害者(或他们的家庭或氏族)的私事,他们可以通过这种方式自己报复他们所遭受的不公正。从中世纪末期开始的刑法宣传进程,使受害者在寻求补救的可能性方面的过程作用被边缘化。然而,纵向刑法关系随着时间的推移发生了一定程度的变化。司法制度的私有化- -现在尤其引人注目- -使人们有可能看到,解决由犯罪引起的冲突的协商一致的方法基本上促成了某种历史进程的逆转。这种逆转当然是为了“揭露”受害者,从而将犯罪所造成的冲突归还给其“所有者”,即。加害者和受害者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信