Comparison of Two Pharmacopoeia Methods for Determining Higher Molecular Weight Proteins in Insulin Glargine

G. Jadaun, Vandana Saklani, Shruti Dixit, R. Rawat, Renu Jain, G. R. Soni
{"title":"Comparison of Two Pharmacopoeia Methods for Determining Higher Molecular Weight Proteins in Insulin Glargine","authors":"G. Jadaun, Vandana Saklani, Shruti Dixit, R. Rawat, Renu Jain, G. R. Soni","doi":"10.5530/PHM.2016.7.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We compared two pharmacopoeia methods, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) and Indian Pharmacopoeia (IP),with respect to their key char­acteristics for determining higher molecular weight proteins (HMWP) in insulin glargine. These methods differ in the mobile phase composition, number of HPLC columns used and run time. Material and Methods: Testing was carried out exactly as described in the respective pharmaco­poeia methods. Results: Our results indicate that both methods provide insulin glargine peak with comparable symmetry factor. Results obtained with two methods are precise in terms of intra-assay variation; however, inter-assay variation was better with IP method. Also, both methods provide similar results in terms of estimation of HMWP content in insulin glargine. Conclusion: Based on the findings we propose that IP method may replace EP method for determination of HMWP content in insulin glargine which will reduce the analysis time and running cost of the test without compromising with the results. Key words: HMWP, Insulin glargine, Monomer, Pharmacopoeia, Size exclusion HPLC.","PeriodicalId":19960,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Methods","volume":"142 1","pages":"35-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/PHM.2016.7.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: We compared two pharmacopoeia methods, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) and Indian Pharmacopoeia (IP),with respect to their key char­acteristics for determining higher molecular weight proteins (HMWP) in insulin glargine. These methods differ in the mobile phase composition, number of HPLC columns used and run time. Material and Methods: Testing was carried out exactly as described in the respective pharmaco­poeia methods. Results: Our results indicate that both methods provide insulin glargine peak with comparable symmetry factor. Results obtained with two methods are precise in terms of intra-assay variation; however, inter-assay variation was better with IP method. Also, both methods provide similar results in terms of estimation of HMWP content in insulin glargine. Conclusion: Based on the findings we propose that IP method may replace EP method for determination of HMWP content in insulin glargine which will reduce the analysis time and running cost of the test without compromising with the results. Key words: HMWP, Insulin glargine, Monomer, Pharmacopoeia, Size exclusion HPLC.
两种药典方法测定甘精胰岛素中高分子量蛋白的比较
目的:比较欧洲药典(EP)和印度药典(IP)两种药典方法测定甘精胰岛素中高分子量蛋白(HMWP)的关键特征。这些方法在流动相组成、HPLC柱数和运行时间上有所不同。材料和方法:试验完全按照各自药典方法的描述进行。结果:两种方法测定的甘精胰岛素峰具有相当的对称系数。两种方法获得的结果在分析内变化方面是精确的;而IP法的测定间差异较大。此外,两种方法在估计甘精胰岛素中HMWP含量方面提供了相似的结果。结论:在不影响实验结果的前提下,IP法可以代替EP法测定甘精胰岛素中HMWP的含量,减少分析时间和运行成本。关键词:高分子量水杨酸,甘精胰岛素,单体,药典,粒径排除高效液相色谱法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信