Il socialismo liberale: Carlo Rosselli

IF 0.2 Q4 LINGUISTICS

Studi e Saggi Linguistici Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.36253/978-88-5518-455-7.06

Enno Ghiandelli

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to investigate issues somehow neglected, the paper tries to carefully outline both the economic and institutional aspect and the origins and development of the Florentine anti-fascist thought. Much has been written about Carlo Rosselli's liberal socialism; still interpretations are often based more on subjective views than on in-depth studies, and this is especially true when it is the current political situation which tries to interpret Rosselli’s thought. Several scholars approached Carlo Rosselli’s thought assuming that the adjective ‘liberal’ can be translated as ‘liberalistic’, that the noun ‘socialist’ can be replaced with ‘welfare’ (of a moderate sort in addition), and finally that the State he theorized proves little interventionist in social and economic life; but this does not seem to be a correct interpretative key.

查看原文本刊更多论文

自由社会主义:卡洛·罗塞利

为了探究一些被忽视的问题，本文试图从经济和制度两个方面，以及佛罗伦萨反法西斯思想的起源和发展进行仔细的概述。关于卡罗·罗塞利的自由社会主义已经写了很多;然而，解释往往更多地基于主观观点，而不是深入的研究，尤其是在当前的政治形势下，试图解释罗塞利的思想。一些学者在研究卡罗·罗塞利的思想时，假设形容词“自由主义”可以翻译为“自由主义”，名词“社会主义”可以用“福利”(另外是一种温和的福利)代替，最后，他理论化的国家证明对社会和经济生活的干预很少;但这似乎不是一个正确的解释关键。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studi e Saggi Linguistici LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： debate in Italy, especially for those scholars working in the field of Indo-European Historical Linguistics and contemporary Theoretical Linguistics. Today, after 50 years of life, Studi e Saggi Linguistici has a firm position in this field, but it also gained a larger international profile, including well-known foreign scholars as members of its Scientific Committee, and fostering the publication of English-written papers. The Editors always aim at publishing original and innovative papers, whose quality and exactness are guaranteed by the prestigious Scientific Committee, and by the anonymous peer-review process. Although a certain preference is accorded to both historical and general Linguistics, in line with the tradition, the Journal welcomes scientific contributions concerning any linguistic field, with no preference or prejudice for particular methodological approaches and theoretical paradigms.