Topical Gel Application and Low Level Laser Therapy on Related Soft Tissue Traumatic Aphthous Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial

A. Domínguez, S. Velásquez
{"title":"Topical Gel Application and Low Level Laser Therapy on Related Soft Tissue Traumatic Aphthous Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"A. Domínguez, S. Velásquez","doi":"10.4172/2469-410X.1000119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the effect of low level laser and Fitostimuline gel® application on pain and healing of orthodontic related traumatic aphthous. Materials and methods: In this double blind and randomized clinical trial, 60 subjects reported traumatic aphthous lesions and the same day they appear immediately they were placed in :G1: (control group) at 13 patients in which only the traumatic factor of the lesion was removed.G2: (Fitostimuline®) 14 patients treated with Fitostimuline® 3 times a day, until the lesion disappeared.G3: (Laser) 14 patients treated with LLLT (Low Level Laser Therapy). G4: (Laser + Fitostimuline®) 15 patients treated with LLLT application and Fitostimuline® 3 times per day, until the lesion healed completely. ANOVA was applied for parametric data, and non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis test - Friedman) and Mann-Whitney U test were made. Past statistical software version 2010 for Excel was used. Results: Higher diameter aphthous ulcer measures and pain significantly reduced for the Fitostimuline Gel®and Laser treated groups or both combined if compared with the control group. The medicament effect its slow if compared to laser therapy, nonetheless when used simultaneously the effect does not differ from the one obtained by laser only application. Fitostimuline Gel® application does not increase laser effect on healing. Conclusions: Topical Fitostimuline Gel® and LLLT therapy are highly efficient treatment options for aphthous ulcer and pain generated by orthodontic treatment, when compared to a control group. LLLT therapy, it’s more effective than Fitostimuline Gel® for orthodontic related aphthous ulcer treatment. Combining therapies do not improve nor enhance treatment results.","PeriodicalId":92245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lasers, optics & photonics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lasers, optics & photonics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-410X.1000119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of low level laser and Fitostimuline gel® application on pain and healing of orthodontic related traumatic aphthous. Materials and methods: In this double blind and randomized clinical trial, 60 subjects reported traumatic aphthous lesions and the same day they appear immediately they were placed in :G1: (control group) at 13 patients in which only the traumatic factor of the lesion was removed.G2: (Fitostimuline®) 14 patients treated with Fitostimuline® 3 times a day, until the lesion disappeared.G3: (Laser) 14 patients treated with LLLT (Low Level Laser Therapy). G4: (Laser + Fitostimuline®) 15 patients treated with LLLT application and Fitostimuline® 3 times per day, until the lesion healed completely. ANOVA was applied for parametric data, and non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis test - Friedman) and Mann-Whitney U test were made. Past statistical software version 2010 for Excel was used. Results: Higher diameter aphthous ulcer measures and pain significantly reduced for the Fitostimuline Gel®and Laser treated groups or both combined if compared with the control group. The medicament effect its slow if compared to laser therapy, nonetheless when used simultaneously the effect does not differ from the one obtained by laser only application. Fitostimuline Gel® application does not increase laser effect on healing. Conclusions: Topical Fitostimuline Gel® and LLLT therapy are highly efficient treatment options for aphthous ulcer and pain generated by orthodontic treatment, when compared to a control group. LLLT therapy, it’s more effective than Fitostimuline Gel® for orthodontic related aphthous ulcer treatment. Combining therapies do not improve nor enhance treatment results.
局部凝胶应用和低水平激光治疗相关软组织创伤性阿弗特溃疡:一项随机临床试验
目的:评价低强度激光联合菲托刺激碱凝胶®治疗正畸相关外伤性口疮疼痛和愈合的效果。材料和方法:在这项双盲随机临床试验中,60名受试者报告了创伤性口疮病变,并在他们出现的当天立即将他们分为G1组(对照组),其中13名患者仅切除了病变的创伤因素。G2组:14例患者给予肌刺激素,每日3次,直至病变消失。G3:(激光)14例患者接受低水平激光治疗。G4:(激光+ Fitostimuline®)15例患者使用LLLT应用和Fitostimuline®每天3次,直至病灶完全愈合。参数数据采用方差分析,采用非参数方差分析(Kruskal-Wallis检验- Friedman)和Mann-Whitney U检验。使用以往的Excel统计软件2010版。结果:与对照组相比,菲托刺激碱凝胶和激光治疗组或两者联合治疗组的大直径溃疡措施和疼痛显著减少。如果与激光治疗相比,药物效果较慢,然而,当同时使用时,效果与激光单独应用所获得的效果没有区别。Fitostimuline Gel®应用不会增加激光对愈合的影响。结论:与对照组相比,局部Fitostimuline Gel®和LLLT治疗是口腔溃疡和正畸治疗引起的疼痛的高效治疗选择。LLLT治疗,对于正畸相关口腔溃疡的治疗比菲托刺激素凝胶®更有效。联合治疗不能改善或提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信