Spatial variation in the "Muslim vote" in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh, 2014

Q3 Social Sciences
Raphael Susewind, Raheel Dhattiwala
{"title":"Spatial variation in the \"Muslim vote\" in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh, 2014","authors":"Raphael Susewind, Raheel Dhattiwala","doi":"10.11588/IAF.2014.45.3290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose to reconcile the controversial debate on Muslim \"vote banks\" in India by shifting the spatial focus from state-wide assessments to the level of constituencies. At the example of Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh in the 2014 general elections, and using an innovative booth-level ecological inference model, we show that Muslims might indeed vote en bloc for or against certain parties, but they tend to do so in a much more localised way than previously assumed. While public Muslim support for the BJP did not translate into electoral support in most places, there are important exceptions to this trend – and at least in the case of Uttar Pradesh, their support for competing parties followed a fairly complex spatial pattern. We further explore this spatial variation in Muslim vote pattern by looking at the moderating impact of minority concentration, violent communal history, and ethnic co-ordination and conclude with a call for more disaggregated research.","PeriodicalId":53574,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Political Weekly","volume":"21 1","pages":"99-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Political Weekly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11588/IAF.2014.45.3290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In this paper, we propose to reconcile the controversial debate on Muslim "vote banks" in India by shifting the spatial focus from state-wide assessments to the level of constituencies. At the example of Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh in the 2014 general elections, and using an innovative booth-level ecological inference model, we show that Muslims might indeed vote en bloc for or against certain parties, but they tend to do so in a much more localised way than previously assumed. While public Muslim support for the BJP did not translate into electoral support in most places, there are important exceptions to this trend – and at least in the case of Uttar Pradesh, their support for competing parties followed a fairly complex spatial pattern. We further explore this spatial variation in Muslim vote pattern by looking at the moderating impact of minority concentration, violent communal history, and ethnic co-ordination and conclude with a call for more disaggregated research.
2014年古吉拉特邦和北方邦“穆斯林投票”的空间变化
在本文中,我们建议通过将空间焦点从全州范围的评估转移到选区层面来调和关于印度穆斯林“投票库”的争议性辩论。以2014年大选中的古吉拉特邦和北方邦为例,并使用创新的展位级生态推断模型,我们表明穆斯林可能确实会集体投票支持或反对某些政党,但他们倾向于以比之前假设的更本地化的方式投票。虽然穆斯林对人民党的公开支持在大多数地方并没有转化为选举支持,但这一趋势也有重要的例外——至少在北方邦,他们对竞争政党的支持遵循着相当复杂的空间格局。我们通过观察少数民族集中、暴力社区历史和种族协调的缓和影响,进一步探讨了穆斯林投票模式的这种空间变化,并呼吁进行更多的分类研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic and Political Weekly
Economic and Political Weekly Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The Economic and Political Weekly, published from Mumbai, is an Indian institution which enjoys a global reputation for excellence in independent scholarship and critical inquiry. First published in 1949 as the Economic Weekly and since 1966 as the Economic and Political Weekly, EPW, as the journal is popularly known, occupies a special place in the intellectual history of independent India. For more than five decades EPW has remained a unique forum that week after week has brought together academics, researchers, policy makers, independent thinkers, members of non-governmental organisations and political activists for debates straddling economics, politics, sociology, culture, the environment and numerous other disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信