Stiffeners Mechanical Effect Analysis by Numerical Coupling

R. N. Bouharkat, A. Sahli, S. Sahli
{"title":"Stiffeners Mechanical Effect Analysis by Numerical Coupling","authors":"R. N. Bouharkat, A. Sahli, S. Sahli","doi":"10.22034/JSM.2019.1876608.1482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given any structure, we seek to find the solution of mechanical problem as precisely and efficiently as possible. Within this condition, the BEM is robust and promising development, standing out in the analysis of cases with occurrence of large stress gradients, as in problems of fracture mechanics. Moreover, in BEM the modeling of infinite means is performed naturally, without the use of approximations. For methods involving domain integration, such as FEM, this is not possible, as models with high number of elements are usually adopted and their ends are considered flexible supports. This paper deals with the development of numerical models based on the BEM for mechanical analysis of stiffened domains. In the modeling of hardeners, immersed in a medium defined by the BEM, we tried to use both the FEM, already present in the literature, and the BEM 1D, being a new formulation. The objective was to perform the coupling of BEM with FEM and BEM 1D for elements of any degree of approximation, evaluating both isotropic and anisotropic medium. In addition, a complementary objective was to verify the effects of the adoption of different discretization and approximation degrees on the stiffeners. However, the coupling with the BEM 1D leaded to more stable results and better approximations. It was observed that the FEM results were instable for many results, mainly in the quadratic approximations. When the approximation degree rises, the methods tend to converge to equivalent results, becoming very close in fourth degree approximation. Lastly, it was observed stress concentration in the stiffeners ends. In these regions, the discretization and the approximation degree have large influence to the numerical response.","PeriodicalId":17126,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solid Mechanics and Materials Engineering","volume":"44 1","pages":"476-492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solid Mechanics and Materials Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22034/JSM.2019.1876608.1482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given any structure, we seek to find the solution of mechanical problem as precisely and efficiently as possible. Within this condition, the BEM is robust and promising development, standing out in the analysis of cases with occurrence of large stress gradients, as in problems of fracture mechanics. Moreover, in BEM the modeling of infinite means is performed naturally, without the use of approximations. For methods involving domain integration, such as FEM, this is not possible, as models with high number of elements are usually adopted and their ends are considered flexible supports. This paper deals with the development of numerical models based on the BEM for mechanical analysis of stiffened domains. In the modeling of hardeners, immersed in a medium defined by the BEM, we tried to use both the FEM, already present in the literature, and the BEM 1D, being a new formulation. The objective was to perform the coupling of BEM with FEM and BEM 1D for elements of any degree of approximation, evaluating both isotropic and anisotropic medium. In addition, a complementary objective was to verify the effects of the adoption of different discretization and approximation degrees on the stiffeners. However, the coupling with the BEM 1D leaded to more stable results and better approximations. It was observed that the FEM results were instable for many results, mainly in the quadratic approximations. When the approximation degree rises, the methods tend to converge to equivalent results, becoming very close in fourth degree approximation. Lastly, it was observed stress concentration in the stiffeners ends. In these regions, the discretization and the approximation degree have large influence to the numerical response.
数值耦合强化筋力学效应分析
对于任何结构,我们都力求尽可能精确和高效地找到机械问题的解决方案。在这种情况下,边界元法是稳健而有前途的发展,在分析大应力梯度的情况下,如在断裂力学问题中脱颖而出。此外,在边界元法中,无限均值的建模是自然进行的,而不使用近似。对于涉及域集成的方法,如FEM,这是不可能的,因为通常采用具有大量单元的模型,并且它们的末端被认为是柔性支撑。本文讨论了基于边界元法的加筋结构力学分析数值模型的发展。在固化剂的建模中,浸入由边界元定义的介质中,我们试图同时使用文献中已经存在的FEM和作为新公式的边界元一维。目标是对任何近似程度的元素进行边界元与有限元和边界元一维的耦合,评估各向同性和各向异性介质。此外,一个补充的目标是验证采用不同的离散化和近似程度对加强筋的影响。然而,与边界元一维的耦合导致了更稳定的结果和更好的近似。结果表明,有限元计算结果在许多情况下是不稳定的,主要是在二次逼近中。当近似度增大时,方法趋于收敛于等效结果,在四次近似时变得非常接近。最后,在加劲肋端部观察到应力集中。在这些区域,离散化和近似程度对数值响应影响较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信