Prevalence and Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Health Care Workers in Tertiary Health Care Institutions in a Developing Country: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study

IF 1.7 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
C. A. Iwu, Pius Ositadinma, Victor Chibiko, U. Madubueze, K. Uwakwe, Uche R. Oluoha
{"title":"Prevalence and Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Health Care Workers in Tertiary Health Care Institutions in a Developing Country: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study","authors":"C. A. Iwu, Pius Ositadinma, Victor Chibiko, U. Madubueze, K. Uwakwe, Uche R. Oluoha","doi":"10.1155/2022/7299092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic highlighted the challenges and impact of vaccine hesitancy and the role of health care institutions in mounting an effective pandemic response. The study objective was to determine the prevalence and predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among health care workers in tertiary health care institutions in Nigeria. Methods. A cross-sectional analytical design that used convenience and snowballing techniques to enroll 347 health care workers from tertiary health care institutions in Imo State, Nigeria, from September 28 to October 14, 2021. Data was collected using a structured online questionnaire and bivariate and multivariate analyses were done using SPSS at a level of significance set at \n \n p\n ≤\n 0.05\n \n . Result. The prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 35.4%. HCWs of the Pentecostal faith (aOR: 2.52) and males (aOR: 2.72) were significantly more likely to be COVID-19 vaccine hesitant. About 30% of the respondents reported that they trusted information from the Internet and social media relating to COVID-19 and its vaccine. However, respondents who felt there was enough information about the vaccine and its safety were more than two and a half times more likely to be vaccine-hesitant (aOR: 2.77). About 20% and 31% of the respondents, respectively, stated that the government has an ulterior motive and that they did not trust the vaccine manufacturers. However, respondents who do not trust the government were more than two and a half times more likely to be COVID-19 vaccine hesitant (aOR: 2.69). Conclusion. The issues of vaccine hesitancy among health care workers in a developing country appear to be fundamental and very challenging to resolve. Therefore, the approach of instituting government vaccine uptake mandates for health care workers may be the solution for tackling vaccine hesitancy in health care institutions.","PeriodicalId":30619,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Public Health","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7299092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic highlighted the challenges and impact of vaccine hesitancy and the role of health care institutions in mounting an effective pandemic response. The study objective was to determine the prevalence and predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among health care workers in tertiary health care institutions in Nigeria. Methods. A cross-sectional analytical design that used convenience and snowballing techniques to enroll 347 health care workers from tertiary health care institutions in Imo State, Nigeria, from September 28 to October 14, 2021. Data was collected using a structured online questionnaire and bivariate and multivariate analyses were done using SPSS at a level of significance set at p ≤ 0.05 . Result. The prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 35.4%. HCWs of the Pentecostal faith (aOR: 2.52) and males (aOR: 2.72) were significantly more likely to be COVID-19 vaccine hesitant. About 30% of the respondents reported that they trusted information from the Internet and social media relating to COVID-19 and its vaccine. However, respondents who felt there was enough information about the vaccine and its safety were more than two and a half times more likely to be vaccine-hesitant (aOR: 2.77). About 20% and 31% of the respondents, respectively, stated that the government has an ulterior motive and that they did not trust the vaccine manufacturers. However, respondents who do not trust the government were more than two and a half times more likely to be COVID-19 vaccine hesitant (aOR: 2.69). Conclusion. The issues of vaccine hesitancy among health care workers in a developing country appear to be fundamental and very challenging to resolve. Therefore, the approach of instituting government vaccine uptake mandates for health care workers may be the solution for tackling vaccine hesitancy in health care institutions.
发展中国家三级卫生保健机构卫生保健工作者COVID-19疫苗犹豫的患病率和预测因素:一项横断面分析研究
背景。2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行凸显了疫苗犹豫的挑战和影响,以及卫生保健机构在有效应对大流行方面的作用。该研究的目的是确定尼日利亚三级卫生保健机构卫生保健工作者中COVID-19疫苗犹豫的患病率和预测因素。方法。采用横断面分析设计,于2021年9月28日至10月14日利用便利和滚雪球技术从尼日利亚伊莫州三级卫生保健机构招募347名卫生保健工作者。采用结构化在线问卷收集数据,采用SPSS进行双变量和多变量分析,p≤0.05为显著性水平。结果。疫苗犹豫率为35.4%。五旬节派(aOR: 2.52)和男性(aOR: 2.72)的卫生保健工作者更有可能对COVID-19疫苗犹豫不决。约30%的受访者表示,他们相信互联网和社交媒体上有关COVID-19及其疫苗的信息。然而,认为关于疫苗及其安全性有足够信息的应答者对疫苗犹豫不决的可能性要高出2.5倍以上(aOR: 2.77)。约20%和31%的受访者分别表示,政府别有用心,他们不信任疫苗制造商。然而,不信任政府的受访者对COVID-19疫苗犹豫不决的可能性是其2.5倍以上(aOR: 2.69)。结论。在一个发展中国家,卫生保健工作者对疫苗的犹豫问题似乎是一个根本性的问题,解决起来非常具有挑战性。因此,对卫生保健工作者制定政府疫苗接种任务的方法可能是解决卫生保健机构中疫苗犹豫问题的解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Public Health
Advances in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信