“Tanked up Yobs” and “Self-Pity City”. Deconstructing the Myths of the Hillsborough Disaster

A. Mcdougall
{"title":"“Tanked up Yobs” and “Self-Pity City”. Deconstructing the Myths of the Hillsborough Disaster","authors":"A. Mcdougall","doi":"10.5771/0172-4029-2019-1-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 15 April 1989, Liverpool FC played Nottingham Forest in an FA Cup semi-final at the Hillsborough Stadium in Sheffield in northern England. Catastrophic errors by the police and other organisations led to the deaths of 96 Liverpool supporters, crushed against the perimeter fences on the Leppings Lane terrace. Though the horrific facts of the disaster were quickly and widely known, they were lost beneath another narrative, promoted by the police, numerous politicians, and large sections of the media. This narrative blamed the disaster on “tanked up yobs”: drunk and aggressive Liverpool supporters, who turned up late and forced their way into the ground. Over the subsequent years and decades, as Hillsborough campaigners vainly sought justice for the disaster’s victims in a series of trials and inquests, the destructive allegation remained in the public realm. It was reinforced by establishment dismissal of Liverpool as a “self-pity city”, home to a community incapable of accepting official verdicts or of leaving the past in the past. This essay uncovers the history of the myths of the Hillsborough disaster. It first shows how these myths were established - how false narratives, with powerful backers, shifted responsibility for the disaster from the police to supporters, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It then examines how these myths were embedded in public discourse - how Liverpool was demonised as an aggressively sentimental city where people refused to admit to “killing their own”. It finally analyses how these myths were overturned through research, media mobilisation, and grassroots activism, a process that culminated in the 2016 inquest verdict, which ruled that the 96 Hillsborough victims were unlawfully killed. In doing so, the essay shows how Hillsborough became a key event in modern British history, influencing everything from stadium design to government legislation.","PeriodicalId":82798,"journal":{"name":"Stadion","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stadion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0172-4029-2019-1-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 15 April 1989, Liverpool FC played Nottingham Forest in an FA Cup semi-final at the Hillsborough Stadium in Sheffield in northern England. Catastrophic errors by the police and other organisations led to the deaths of 96 Liverpool supporters, crushed against the perimeter fences on the Leppings Lane terrace. Though the horrific facts of the disaster were quickly and widely known, they were lost beneath another narrative, promoted by the police, numerous politicians, and large sections of the media. This narrative blamed the disaster on “tanked up yobs”: drunk and aggressive Liverpool supporters, who turned up late and forced their way into the ground. Over the subsequent years and decades, as Hillsborough campaigners vainly sought justice for the disaster’s victims in a series of trials and inquests, the destructive allegation remained in the public realm. It was reinforced by establishment dismissal of Liverpool as a “self-pity city”, home to a community incapable of accepting official verdicts or of leaving the past in the past. This essay uncovers the history of the myths of the Hillsborough disaster. It first shows how these myths were established - how false narratives, with powerful backers, shifted responsibility for the disaster from the police to supporters, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It then examines how these myths were embedded in public discourse - how Liverpool was demonised as an aggressively sentimental city where people refused to admit to “killing their own”. It finally analyses how these myths were overturned through research, media mobilisation, and grassroots activism, a process that culminated in the 2016 inquest verdict, which ruled that the 96 Hillsborough victims were unlawfully killed. In doing so, the essay shows how Hillsborough became a key event in modern British history, influencing everything from stadium design to government legislation.
“酗酒的年轻人”和“自怜之城”。解构希尔斯堡惨案的神话
1989年4月15日,在英格兰北部谢菲尔德的希尔斯堡体育场,利物浦在足总杯半决赛中对阵诺丁汉森林队。警察和其他组织的灾难性失误导致96名利物浦球迷在莱平斯巷看台的围栏上被压死。尽管这场灾难的可怕事实迅速而广为人知,但它们却被另一种叙述所掩盖,这种叙述是由警察、众多政客和大部分媒体宣传的。这种说法将这场灾难归咎于“醉醺醺的懒汉”:那些喝醉酒、咄咄逼人的利物浦球迷,他们迟到了,强行进入球场。在随后的几年和几十年里,尽管希尔斯堡事件的活动人士在一系列审判和调查中徒劳地为这场灾难的受害者寻求正义,但这一破坏性指控仍然存在于公共领域。当政派认为利物浦是一个“自怜的城市”,是一个无法接受官方裁决或让过去成为过去的社区的所在地,这进一步强化了这种情绪。这篇文章揭示了希尔斯堡惨案神话的历史。它首先展示了这些神话是如何建立起来的——有强大支持者的虚假叙述是如何将灾难的责任从警方转移到支持者身上的,尽管有压倒性的相反证据。然后,它考察了这些神话是如何嵌入公共话语的——利物浦是如何被妖魔化为一个激进的多愁善感的城市,人们拒绝承认“杀死自己的同胞”。最后,它分析了这些神话是如何通过研究、媒体动员和基层行动被推翻的,这一过程最终导致了2016年的调查裁决,该裁决裁定,96名希尔斯堡遇难者是被非法杀害的。在此过程中,这篇文章展示了希尔斯堡如何成为现代英国历史上的一个关键事件,影响了从体育场设计到政府立法的方方面面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信