Shining a light on food insecurity in Aotearoa New Zealand: Modification of a food security scale for use with individuals who have extreme food security needs

IF 0.5 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
H. Robinson, Kelsey L. Deane, A. Bartley, M. Alansari, Caitlin Neuwelt-Kearns
{"title":"Shining a light on food insecurity in Aotearoa New Zealand: Modification of a food security scale for use with individuals who have extreme food security needs","authors":"H. Robinson, Kelsey L. Deane, A. Bartley, M. Alansari, Caitlin Neuwelt-Kearns","doi":"10.11157/anzswj-vol33iss4id910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Food insecurity in Aotearoa New Zealand is a growing concern but quantitative evidence focused on those in most need of support is scarce in the Aotearoa New Zealand context. This limits policy and practice decisions.METHODS: We modified Parnell and Gray’s (2014) Aotearoa New Zealand based food security scale to better capture the severity of food insecurity for individuals living in poverty and used a questionnaire to collect data from a sample of individuals seeking food assistance from foodbanks in Tāmaki Makaurau (Auckland). We used confirmatory factor analysis to assess the psychometric validity of the modified scale. We also tested group differences in food insecurity by gender and ethnicity using analysis of variance and investigated correlations between age, household size and food insecurity.FINDINGS: We found a six-item version of Parnell and Gray’s (2014) scale to be psychometrically robust for use with the study population. The sample participants reported concerning and chronic levels of food insecurity. We did not find any group differences.CONCLUSIONS: At the severe end of the food insecurity continuum, gender and ethnic subgroups appear to suffer at similar levels; however, this does not suggest that different approaches are not required to best meet the needs of different demographic subgroups. Further research is needed to ascertain how similar levels of food insecurity may produce differential effects on wellbeing outcomes for different groups. We recommend more widespread and regular use of the modified scale to assess the experience and impact of food insecurity for individuals living in poverty because it provides a more fine-grained understanding of the severity of food insecurity challenges experienced by individuals seeking food assistance. Fit for purpose measures enable accurate assessments that can better inform policymaking and practice decisions to reduce inequality and promote economic justice.","PeriodicalId":44524,"journal":{"name":"Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol33iss4id910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Food insecurity in Aotearoa New Zealand is a growing concern but quantitative evidence focused on those in most need of support is scarce in the Aotearoa New Zealand context. This limits policy and practice decisions.METHODS: We modified Parnell and Gray’s (2014) Aotearoa New Zealand based food security scale to better capture the severity of food insecurity for individuals living in poverty and used a questionnaire to collect data from a sample of individuals seeking food assistance from foodbanks in Tāmaki Makaurau (Auckland). We used confirmatory factor analysis to assess the psychometric validity of the modified scale. We also tested group differences in food insecurity by gender and ethnicity using analysis of variance and investigated correlations between age, household size and food insecurity.FINDINGS: We found a six-item version of Parnell and Gray’s (2014) scale to be psychometrically robust for use with the study population. The sample participants reported concerning and chronic levels of food insecurity. We did not find any group differences.CONCLUSIONS: At the severe end of the food insecurity continuum, gender and ethnic subgroups appear to suffer at similar levels; however, this does not suggest that different approaches are not required to best meet the needs of different demographic subgroups. Further research is needed to ascertain how similar levels of food insecurity may produce differential effects on wellbeing outcomes for different groups. We recommend more widespread and regular use of the modified scale to assess the experience and impact of food insecurity for individuals living in poverty because it provides a more fine-grained understanding of the severity of food insecurity challenges experienced by individuals seeking food assistance. Fit for purpose measures enable accurate assessments that can better inform policymaking and practice decisions to reduce inequality and promote economic justice.
揭示新西兰奥特罗阿的粮食不安全状况:修改粮食安全量表,供有极端粮食安全需求的个人使用
导言:新西兰奥特罗阿的粮食不安全问题日益受到关注,但在新西兰奥特罗阿的背景下,关注最需要支持的人的定量证据很少。这限制了政策和实践决策。方法:我们修改了Parnell和Gray(2014)基于新西兰Aotearoa的粮食安全量表,以更好地捕捉生活在贫困中的个人粮食不安全的严重程度,并使用问卷调查从Tāmaki Makaurau (Auckland)食品银行寻求粮食援助的个人样本中收集数据。我们使用验证性因子分析来评估修正量表的心理测量效度。我们还通过方差分析测试了性别和种族在粮食不安全方面的群体差异,并调查了年龄、家庭规模与粮食不安全之间的相关性。研究结果:我们发现帕内尔和格雷(2014)量表的六项版本在心理测量学上是可靠的,适用于研究人群。样本参与者报告了令人担忧的和长期的粮食不安全水平。我们没有发现任何群体差异。结论:在粮食不安全连续体的严重端,性别和种族亚群体似乎遭受了相似的程度;但是,这并不意味着不需要采取不同的办法来最好地满足不同人口分组的需要。需要进一步的研究来确定相似水平的粮食不安全如何对不同群体的健康结果产生不同的影响。我们建议更广泛和定期地使用修改后的量表来评估生活在贫困中的个人的粮食不安全经历和影响,因为它可以更细致地了解寻求粮食援助的个人所面临的粮食不安全挑战的严重程度。适用的衡量标准能够进行准确的评估,从而更好地为政策制定和实践决策提供信息,以减少不平等和促进经济公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
28.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信