The circular economy and resource use reduction: A case study of long-term resource efficiency measures in a medium manufacturing company

Anastassija Konash, Nabil Nasr
{"title":"The circular economy and resource use reduction: A case study of long-term resource efficiency measures in a medium manufacturing company","authors":"Anastassija Konash,&nbsp;Nabil Nasr","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2022.100025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Manufacturers are often identified as agents of change to conserve resources. The circular economy is the paradigm of the societal operation model that aims to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation through a system of efficiency measures. However, a growing body of literature reported the failure of efficiency measures to conserve energy and resources in the current socio-economic environment. Several complex compensatory mechanisms called the rebound effect were reported to offset efficiency gains and resulted in higher resource use.</p><p>In this paper, we addressed the lack of data on the microeconomic one-company rebound effect investigation by presenting the case study of a medium manufacturer from the US that implemented energy, water and material efficiency measures. While the company qualified as a top-performing “circularity developer” according to the published self-assessment questionnaire, it retained its linear business model. Energy efficiency and renewable energy measures resulted in a short-term rebound effect of 161% or backfire. In the long term, the rebound effect of 25% was calculated. The drivers and barriers that the company encountered when implementing efficiency measures were identified. In conclusion, it was found that the system focused exclusively on efficiency was incapable of conserving resource use and delivering on CE decoupling promise. Wider societal acceptance of sufficiency measures was suggested to improve resource-saving capacity in manufacturing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791622000239/pdfft?md5=1ef387e0dc0b790b7e85b4a9fe148880&pid=1-s2.0-S2666791622000239-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791622000239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Manufacturers are often identified as agents of change to conserve resources. The circular economy is the paradigm of the societal operation model that aims to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation through a system of efficiency measures. However, a growing body of literature reported the failure of efficiency measures to conserve energy and resources in the current socio-economic environment. Several complex compensatory mechanisms called the rebound effect were reported to offset efficiency gains and resulted in higher resource use.

In this paper, we addressed the lack of data on the microeconomic one-company rebound effect investigation by presenting the case study of a medium manufacturer from the US that implemented energy, water and material efficiency measures. While the company qualified as a top-performing “circularity developer” according to the published self-assessment questionnaire, it retained its linear business model. Energy efficiency and renewable energy measures resulted in a short-term rebound effect of 161% or backfire. In the long term, the rebound effect of 25% was calculated. The drivers and barriers that the company encountered when implementing efficiency measures were identified. In conclusion, it was found that the system focused exclusively on efficiency was incapable of conserving resource use and delivering on CE decoupling promise. Wider societal acceptance of sufficiency measures was suggested to improve resource-saving capacity in manufacturing.

Abstract Image

循环经济与资源节约:一家中型制造企业长期资源效率措施的案例研究
制造商通常被认为是节约资源的变革推动者。循环经济是社会运行模式的典范,旨在通过一套效率措施系统将经济增长与环境退化脱钩。然而,越来越多的文献报告说,在目前的社会经济环境中,节约能源和资源的效率措施失败了。据报道,几种称为反弹效应的复杂补偿机制抵消了效率的提高,导致了更高的资源利用。在本文中,我们通过介绍美国一家中型制造商实施能源、水和材料效率措施的案例研究,解决了微观经济单一公司反弹效应调查数据的缺乏问题。虽然根据公布的自我评估问卷,该公司有资格成为表现最佳的“循环开发者”,但它保留了其线性商业模式。能源效率和可再生能源措施导致了161%的短期反弹效应或适得其反。从长期来看,计算了25%的反弹效应。确定了公司在实施效率措施时遇到的驱动因素和障碍。综上所述,仅关注效率的系统无法节约资源利用并实现CE解耦承诺。建议社会更广泛地接受充足性措施,以提高制造业的资源节约能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信