Problems of implementation and protection of the rights of participants in economic relations in the conditions of the digital divide

N. Solovyanenko
{"title":"Problems of implementation and protection of the rights of participants in economic relations in the conditions of the digital divide","authors":"N. Solovyanenko","doi":"10.31857/s102694520024344-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the use of digital technologies in most areas of business activity in the light of the global characteristics of post-industrial society - the technologization of most areas of human life. The author explores one of the most pressing issues of the digital era – the growing digital divide (from the English digital divide), or digital inequality in terms of access to information technologies and their use in economic, including procedures for protecting the rights and legitimate interests of subjects of the digital economy. There is a destructive sign of the modern digital divide - the lack of digital literacy, knowledge or problem-solving skills to perform tasks in a digital environment. It is concluded that research in the field of law should not ignore the consequences of digital inequality: the disadvantage of small and medium-sized businesses in legal relations with large technology suppliers, the inability to assess contractual conditions due to overloading with technological terminology, damage due to inadequate assessment of security risk, neglect of cyber hygiene requirements, and others. Overcoming the digital inequality of the parties when using online mechanisms for the protection of rights and legitimate interests excludes a purely technocratic approach and complies with the rules of fair trial.","PeriodicalId":82769,"journal":{"name":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520024344-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the use of digital technologies in most areas of business activity in the light of the global characteristics of post-industrial society - the technologization of most areas of human life. The author explores one of the most pressing issues of the digital era – the growing digital divide (from the English digital divide), or digital inequality in terms of access to information technologies and their use in economic, including procedures for protecting the rights and legitimate interests of subjects of the digital economy. There is a destructive sign of the modern digital divide - the lack of digital literacy, knowledge or problem-solving skills to perform tasks in a digital environment. It is concluded that research in the field of law should not ignore the consequences of digital inequality: the disadvantage of small and medium-sized businesses in legal relations with large technology suppliers, the inability to assess contractual conditions due to overloading with technological terminology, damage due to inadequate assessment of security risk, neglect of cyber hygiene requirements, and others. Overcoming the digital inequality of the parties when using online mechanisms for the protection of rights and legitimate interests excludes a purely technocratic approach and complies with the rules of fair trial.
数字鸿沟条件下经济关系参与者权利的实现与保护问题
根据后工业社会的全球特征——人类生活的大多数领域的技术化,本文考虑了数字技术在大多数商业活动领域的使用。作者探讨了数字时代最紧迫的问题之一——日益增长的数字鸿沟(来自英语数字鸿沟),或在获取信息技术及其在经济中的使用方面的数字不平等,包括保护数字经济主体的权利和合法利益的程序。现代数字鸿沟有一个破坏性的迹象——缺乏在数字环境中执行任务的数字素养、知识或解决问题的技能。结论是,法律领域的研究不应忽视数字不平等的后果:中小企业在与大型技术供应商的法律关系中处于劣势,由于技术术语超载而无法评估合同条件,由于安全风险评估不足而造成的损害,忽视网络卫生要求等等。在使用网络机制保护权利和合法利益时,克服各方的数字不平等,排除纯粹的技术官僚方法,符合公平审判的规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信