¿qué dicen los manuales de historia sobre la infancia? análisis de textos escolares chilenos

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Humberto Andrés Álvarez Sepúlveda
{"title":"¿qué dicen los manuales de historia sobre la infancia? análisis de textos escolares chilenos","authors":"Humberto Andrés Álvarez Sepúlveda","doi":"10.12957/childphilo.2021.62884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History textbooks in Chile are characterized by exposing an adult-centered historical narrative that invisibilizes the participation of boys and girls, since they have traditionally focused on describing the political exploits carried out by elite adult men in national and western history. To evidence this problem, in this qualitative, exploratory and interpretive research, critical literacy is used to analyze the texts and images of four textbooks published between 2016 and 2019 by SM and Santillana publishers. From these manuals, thematic units related to Ancient Rome and Greece, colonial Chile, and European history of the 19th and 20th centuries were selected because they have the most relevant evidence to examine the subject. It is concluded that the analyzed discourses show that infants are marginalized social actors in history or are represented from the adult-centered paradigm as dependent and subordinate subjects to the adult world. Faced with this scenario, the importance of prioritizing children’s perspectives in the study of history and in the problematization of historical contents taught in the classroom is emphasized.","PeriodicalId":42107,"journal":{"name":"Childhood and Philosophy","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.62884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

History textbooks in Chile are characterized by exposing an adult-centered historical narrative that invisibilizes the participation of boys and girls, since they have traditionally focused on describing the political exploits carried out by elite adult men in national and western history. To evidence this problem, in this qualitative, exploratory and interpretive research, critical literacy is used to analyze the texts and images of four textbooks published between 2016 and 2019 by SM and Santillana publishers. From these manuals, thematic units related to Ancient Rome and Greece, colonial Chile, and European history of the 19th and 20th centuries were selected because they have the most relevant evidence to examine the subject. It is concluded that the analyzed discourses show that infants are marginalized social actors in history or are represented from the adult-centered paradigm as dependent and subordinate subjects to the adult world. Faced with this scenario, the importance of prioritizing children’s perspectives in the study of history and in the problematization of historical contents taught in the classroom is emphasized.
历史手册是怎么说童年的?智利学校文本分析
智利历史教科书的特点是以成人为中心的历史叙事,忽略了男孩和女孩的参与,因为它们传统上专注于描述国家和西方历史上精英成年男子的政治功绩。为了证明这一问题,在这项定性、探索性和解释性的研究中,批判性素养被用来分析SM和Santillana出版社在2016年至2019年间出版的四本教科书的文本和图像。从这些手册中,选择了与古罗马和希腊、殖民智利、19世纪和20世纪欧洲历史相关的主题单元,因为它们有最相关的证据来研究这个主题。研究结果表明,婴儿在历史上是被边缘化的社会行动者,或者是从成人为中心的范式中被表现为依赖和从属于成人世界的主体。面对这种情况,强调在历史研究中优先考虑儿童的观点以及在课堂上教授历史内容的问题化的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信