I Think It’s Okay … But It’s Racist, It’s Bad Racism' — Aboriginal Children and Young People’s Views about the Intervention

Holly Doel-Mackaway
{"title":"I Think It’s Okay … But It’s Racist, It’s Bad Racism' — Aboriginal Children and Young People’s Views about the Intervention","authors":"Holly Doel-Mackaway","doi":"10.26180/5DB80864F0DB1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Field research conducted in the Northern Territory sought Aboriginal children and young people's views about the 'Intervention' and revealed the impact of these measures on their lives, on Aboriginal peoples and in Aboriginal communities. Research participants articulated detailed knowledge about the Intervention and expressed their nuanced views about two key measures: income management through the BasicsCard, and alcohol regulation through the 'blue and white warning signs' that were placed at the entrance to all prescribed communities. Most participants said the BasicsCard positively impacted aspects of their lives, yet nearly all participants were unaware that the BasicsCard targeted Aboriginal peoples and upon learning this children and young people assessed the measure as 'bad racism'. Participants unanimously agreed that the blue and white warning signs were an ineffective regulatory measure that negatively impacted their lives by 'shaming' communities and making them 'look bad'. This research is significant because it (a) presents the first academic accounts from Aboriginal children and young people detailing their views about the Intervention; (b) demonstrates Aboriginal children and young people's agency and capacity to express informed views about complex matters such as legislation and policy; and (c) shows that the involvement of Aboriginal children and young people in the design of laws and policies likely to affect them is not only the Australian government's responsibility under art 12 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and Australia's obligation under art 19 of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, but is an effective and necessary precondition for the development of relevant, culturally appropriate and durable laws and policies that advance Aboriginal children and young people's human rights.","PeriodicalId":44672,"journal":{"name":"Monash University Law Review","volume":"16 1 1","pages":"76-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26180/5DB80864F0DB1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Field research conducted in the Northern Territory sought Aboriginal children and young people's views about the 'Intervention' and revealed the impact of these measures on their lives, on Aboriginal peoples and in Aboriginal communities. Research participants articulated detailed knowledge about the Intervention and expressed their nuanced views about two key measures: income management through the BasicsCard, and alcohol regulation through the 'blue and white warning signs' that were placed at the entrance to all prescribed communities. Most participants said the BasicsCard positively impacted aspects of their lives, yet nearly all participants were unaware that the BasicsCard targeted Aboriginal peoples and upon learning this children and young people assessed the measure as 'bad racism'. Participants unanimously agreed that the blue and white warning signs were an ineffective regulatory measure that negatively impacted their lives by 'shaming' communities and making them 'look bad'. This research is significant because it (a) presents the first academic accounts from Aboriginal children and young people detailing their views about the Intervention; (b) demonstrates Aboriginal children and young people's agency and capacity to express informed views about complex matters such as legislation and policy; and (c) shows that the involvement of Aboriginal children and young people in the design of laws and policies likely to affect them is not only the Australian government's responsibility under art 12 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and Australia's obligation under art 19 of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, but is an effective and necessary precondition for the development of relevant, culturally appropriate and durable laws and policies that advance Aboriginal children and young people's human rights.
我认为这还好,但这是种族主义,是恶劣的种族主义”——原住民儿童和年轻人对干预的看法
在北领地进行的实地调查寻求土著儿童和年轻人对“干预”的看法,并揭示了这些措施对他们的生活、对土著人民和土著社区的影响。研究参与者阐述了有关干预的详细知识,并表达了他们对两项关键措施的细微看法:通过基本卡片进行收入管理,以及通过在所有规定社区入口处放置的“蓝白警告标志”进行酒精管制。大多数参与者表示,基本卡片对他们生活的方方面面产生了积极影响,但几乎所有参与者都没有意识到基本卡片针对的是土著居民,在得知这一点后,儿童和年轻人将该措施评价为“恶劣的种族主义”。参与者一致认为,蓝白警告标志是一种无效的监管措施,它“羞辱”了社区,让他们“看起来很糟糕”,对他们的生活产生了负面影响。这项研究意义重大,因为它(a)首次提供了来自土著儿童和年轻人的学术报告,详细介绍了他们对干预的看法;(b)显示土著儿童和青年对立法和政策等复杂事项表达知情意见的能动性和能力;(c)表明土著儿童和青年参与设计可能影响到他们的法律和政策不仅是澳大利亚政府根据《儿童权利公约》第12条的责任,也是澳大利亚根据《土著人民权利宣言》第19条的义务,而且是制定有关的、促进土著儿童和青年人权的文化上适当和持久的法律和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信