Study of Nasal Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FENO) in Children with Allergic Rhinitis

Sinusitis Pub Date : 2021-10-08 DOI:10.3390/sinusitis5020013
S. Duong-Quy, Thuy Nguyen-Thi-Dieu, K. Tran-Quang, Tram Tang-Thi-Thao, T. Nguyen-Van, Thu Vo-Pham-Minh, Q. Vu-Tran-Thien, K. Bui-Diem, V. Nguyen-Nhu, Lam Hoang-Thi, T. Craig
{"title":"Study of Nasal Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FENO) in Children with Allergic Rhinitis","authors":"S. Duong-Quy, Thuy Nguyen-Thi-Dieu, K. Tran-Quang, Tram Tang-Thi-Thao, T. Nguyen-Van, Thu Vo-Pham-Minh, Q. Vu-Tran-Thien, K. Bui-Diem, V. Nguyen-Nhu, Lam Hoang-Thi, T. Craig","doi":"10.3390/sinusitis5020013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(1) Background: Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) has been considered as a biomarker of airway inflammation. The measurement of fractional exhaled NO (FENO) is a valuable test for assessing local inflammation in subjects with allergic rhinitis (AR). (2) Objective: To evaluate (a) the correlation between nasal FENO with anthropometric characteristics, symptoms of AR and nasal peak flows in children without and with AR; and (b) the cut-off of nasal FENO for diagnosis of AR in symptomatic children. (3) Methods: The study was a descriptive and cross-sectional study in subjects with and without AR < 18 years old. All clinical and functional characteristics of the study subjects were recorded for analysis. They were divided into healthy subjects for the control group and subjects with AR who met all inclusion criteria. (4) Results: 100 subjects (14 ± 3 years) were included, including 32 control subjects and 68 patients with AR. Nasal FENO in AR patients was significantly higher than in control subjects: 985 ± 232 ppb vs. 229 ± 65 ppb (p < 0.001). In control subjects, nasal FENO was not correlated with anthropometric characteristics and nasal inspiratory or expiratory peak flows (IPF or EPF) (p > 0.05). There was a correlation between nasal FENO and AR symptoms in AR patients and nasal IPF and EPF (p = 0.001 and 0.0001, respectively). The cut-off of nasal FENO for positive AR diagnosis with the highest specificity and sensitivity was ≥794 ppb (96.7% and 92.6%, respectively). (5) Conclusion: The use of nasal FENO as a biomarker of AR provides a useful tool and additional armamentarium in the management of allergic rhinitis.","PeriodicalId":21793,"journal":{"name":"Sinusitis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sinusitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sinusitis5020013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

(1) Background: Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) has been considered as a biomarker of airway inflammation. The measurement of fractional exhaled NO (FENO) is a valuable test for assessing local inflammation in subjects with allergic rhinitis (AR). (2) Objective: To evaluate (a) the correlation between nasal FENO with anthropometric characteristics, symptoms of AR and nasal peak flows in children without and with AR; and (b) the cut-off of nasal FENO for diagnosis of AR in symptomatic children. (3) Methods: The study was a descriptive and cross-sectional study in subjects with and without AR < 18 years old. All clinical and functional characteristics of the study subjects were recorded for analysis. They were divided into healthy subjects for the control group and subjects with AR who met all inclusion criteria. (4) Results: 100 subjects (14 ± 3 years) were included, including 32 control subjects and 68 patients with AR. Nasal FENO in AR patients was significantly higher than in control subjects: 985 ± 232 ppb vs. 229 ± 65 ppb (p < 0.001). In control subjects, nasal FENO was not correlated with anthropometric characteristics and nasal inspiratory or expiratory peak flows (IPF or EPF) (p > 0.05). There was a correlation between nasal FENO and AR symptoms in AR patients and nasal IPF and EPF (p = 0.001 and 0.0001, respectively). The cut-off of nasal FENO for positive AR diagnosis with the highest specificity and sensitivity was ≥794 ppb (96.7% and 92.6%, respectively). (5) Conclusion: The use of nasal FENO as a biomarker of AR provides a useful tool and additional armamentarium in the management of allergic rhinitis.
变应性鼻炎患儿鼻腔呼出一氧化氮分数(FENO)的研究
(1)背景:呼出一氧化氮(NO)被认为是气道炎症的生物标志物。呼气一氧化氮分数(FENO)的测量是评估过敏性鼻炎(AR)患者局部炎症的一项有价值的测试。(2)目的:评估(a)无AR和有AR的儿童鼻腔FENO与人体测量学特征、AR症状和鼻峰流量的相关性;(b)截断鼻腔FENO对有症状儿童的AR诊断。(3)方法:采用描述性和横断面研究方法,研究对象为年龄< 18岁的AR患者和非AR患者。记录研究对象的所有临床和功能特征以供分析。他们被分为健康受试者作为对照组和符合所有纳入标准的AR受试者。(4)结果:纳入100例受试者(14±3岁),其中对照组32例,AR患者68例,AR患者鼻部FENO显著高于对照组:985±232 ppb比229±65 ppb (p < 0.001)。在对照组中,鼻腔FENO与人体测量特征和鼻腔吸气或呼气峰流量(IPF或EPF)无关(p < 0.05)。AR患者鼻腔FENO与AR症状、鼻腔IPF和EPF之间存在相关性(p分别为0.001和0.0001)。鼻腔FENO诊断AR阳性的最高特异性和敏感性临界值≥794 ppb(分别为96.7%和92.6%)。(5)结论:使用鼻腔FENO作为AR的生物标志物,为变应性鼻炎的治疗提供了一种有用的工具和额外的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信