Micro Combined Heat and Power Systems – Evaluation of a Sample Application

Anayo Ezeamama, E. Albrecht
{"title":"Micro Combined Heat and Power Systems – Evaluation of a Sample Application","authors":"Anayo Ezeamama, E. Albrecht","doi":"10.5539/ENRR.V9N3P1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing need for a secure, cost-effective, less polluting and efficient form of energy has contributed to an increasing interest in the use of micro combined heat and power (MCHP) systems. In this paper, the environmental performance and economic feasibility of a 1 kWe internal combustion engine (ICE) MCHP system in a one-family house was assessed and compared with the baseline scenario were residential energy demands are met with grid electricity and natural gas fired condensing boilers. The result of the analysis shows that MCHP systems present opportunities for savings in energy costs. Based on a social discount rate (SDR) of 5 % and a calculated 3259 operating hours, a simple payback period of about 4.8 years was derived as the time needed to recover the extra investment cost of the ICE unit. The result of the sensitivity analysis reveals that, both the running hours and price of electricity have significant effects on the payback period of the project. Considering the end of useful life period of the systems, MCHP offer a good replacement for conventional gas boilers of 90 % efficiency. However, their high initial costs (when compared to high efficiency condensing boilers), could be seen as the major factor hampering market diffusion. Also, considering the optimal environmental benefits, MCHP system produced more on-site CO2 emissions in reference to the condensing boiler but generally, annual CO2 emission is reduced by about 38 % when compared to the overall separate generation of heat and power scenario.","PeriodicalId":11699,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ENRR.V9N3P1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The growing need for a secure, cost-effective, less polluting and efficient form of energy has contributed to an increasing interest in the use of micro combined heat and power (MCHP) systems. In this paper, the environmental performance and economic feasibility of a 1 kWe internal combustion engine (ICE) MCHP system in a one-family house was assessed and compared with the baseline scenario were residential energy demands are met with grid electricity and natural gas fired condensing boilers. The result of the analysis shows that MCHP systems present opportunities for savings in energy costs. Based on a social discount rate (SDR) of 5 % and a calculated 3259 operating hours, a simple payback period of about 4.8 years was derived as the time needed to recover the extra investment cost of the ICE unit. The result of the sensitivity analysis reveals that, both the running hours and price of electricity have significant effects on the payback period of the project. Considering the end of useful life period of the systems, MCHP offer a good replacement for conventional gas boilers of 90 % efficiency. However, their high initial costs (when compared to high efficiency condensing boilers), could be seen as the major factor hampering market diffusion. Also, considering the optimal environmental benefits, MCHP system produced more on-site CO2 emissions in reference to the condensing boiler but generally, annual CO2 emission is reduced by about 38 % when compared to the overall separate generation of heat and power scenario.
微型热电联产系统。样品应用的评价
对安全、成本效益高、污染少、效率高的能源形式的需求日益增长,促使人们对微型热电联产(MCHP)系统的使用越来越感兴趣。本文对单户住宅中1千瓦内燃机MCHP系统的环境性能和经济可行性进行了评估,并与电网供电和天然气冷凝锅炉满足住宅能源需求的基线方案进行了比较。分析结果表明,MCHP系统提供了节约能源成本的机会。基于5%的社会贴现率(SDR)和计算出的3259个运行小时,简单的投资回收期约为4.8年,这是回收ICE装置额外投资成本所需的时间。敏感性分析结果表明,运行时数和电价对项目的投资回收期均有显著影响。考虑到系统的使用寿命,MCHP提供了一个很好的替代传统的燃气锅炉,效率为90%。然而,它们的高初始成本(与高效率冷凝锅炉相比)可被视为阻碍市场扩散的主要因素。此外,考虑到最佳的环境效益,与冷凝锅炉相比,MCHP系统产生了更多的现场二氧化碳排放,但总的来说,与整体单独发电的情况相比,年二氧化碳排放量减少了约38%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信