Implementing a modified intraoperative grading system for a difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Yarub Momtaz Tawfeek Al-Hakeem, Nashwan Q. Mahgoob
{"title":"Implementing a modified intraoperative grading system for a difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy","authors":"Yarub Momtaz Tawfeek Al-Hakeem, Nashwan Q. Mahgoob","doi":"10.33899/MMED.2021.128336.1047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze intraoperative grading findings during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy by which we can assess the surgical performance regarding its safety, achievability and to determine a safe operative approach and/or time for conversion. Design: An observational prospective case series study. Setting: During the period from June 2018 to January 2020, operations were done by 4 qualified consultant surgeons and their teams at 4 hospitals in Mosul and Erbil. Participants: Two hundred and fifty-five patients. Patients and Methods: All patients underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallbladder disease after full evaluation and taking their informed consents. An intraoperative difficulty calculation score has been implemented that divide the situation into 4 grades: easy, difficult, very difficult and extremely difficult, depending on the appearance of the gall bladder wall color, amount of adhesion, the presence of anatomical abnormalities, and the ability to achieve the critical view of safety. Perforation of the gallbladder, slipped stones, bleeding, using extra instruments, the need for extending the epigastric incision, the use of a drain and conversion to open procedure as well as the duration of surgical intervention had been recorded as predictors for the assessment of the difficulty level during surgery. Results: The first grade included 168 (66%) patients, the second grade included 62 (24%) patients, while grades 3 and 4 represent 15 (6%) and 10 (4%) of patients respectively. Perforation showed no significance in the grading. Bleeding was more common in grades 3 and 4. Using accessory equipment was mandatory to complete the operation in grade 4 as well as an extension of epigastric port and the need for putting a drain. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was done in 2 operations (0.7%), both belonged to grade 3 and 4. The time needed to accomplish the operation was significantly high in grades 3 and 4. Conclusion: This modified grading score can provide a tool for reporting operative findings and technical difficulties during laparoscopic cholecystectomy that allow the surgeon to know the seriousness of the situation and taking effective measures to overcome it.","PeriodicalId":8334,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the College of Medicine, Mosul","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the College of Medicine, Mosul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33899/MMED.2021.128336.1047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze intraoperative grading findings during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy by which we can assess the surgical performance regarding its safety, achievability and to determine a safe operative approach and/or time for conversion. Design: An observational prospective case series study. Setting: During the period from June 2018 to January 2020, operations were done by 4 qualified consultant surgeons and their teams at 4 hospitals in Mosul and Erbil. Participants: Two hundred and fifty-five patients. Patients and Methods: All patients underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallbladder disease after full evaluation and taking their informed consents. An intraoperative difficulty calculation score has been implemented that divide the situation into 4 grades: easy, difficult, very difficult and extremely difficult, depending on the appearance of the gall bladder wall color, amount of adhesion, the presence of anatomical abnormalities, and the ability to achieve the critical view of safety. Perforation of the gallbladder, slipped stones, bleeding, using extra instruments, the need for extending the epigastric incision, the use of a drain and conversion to open procedure as well as the duration of surgical intervention had been recorded as predictors for the assessment of the difficulty level during surgery. Results: The first grade included 168 (66%) patients, the second grade included 62 (24%) patients, while grades 3 and 4 represent 15 (6%) and 10 (4%) of patients respectively. Perforation showed no significance in the grading. Bleeding was more common in grades 3 and 4. Using accessory equipment was mandatory to complete the operation in grade 4 as well as an extension of epigastric port and the need for putting a drain. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was done in 2 operations (0.7%), both belonged to grade 3 and 4. The time needed to accomplish the operation was significantly high in grades 3 and 4. Conclusion: This modified grading score can provide a tool for reporting operative findings and technical difficulties during laparoscopic cholecystectomy that allow the surgeon to know the seriousness of the situation and taking effective measures to overcome it.
在困难的腹腔镜胆囊切除术中实施改进的术中分级系统
目的:分析择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的术中分级结果,以评估手术的安全性和可实现性,并确定安全的手术入路和/或转换时间。设计:观察性前瞻性病例系列研究。环境:2018年6月至2020年1月期间,摩苏尔和埃尔比勒4家医院的4名合格顾问外科医生及其团队进行了手术。参与者:255名患者。患者和方法:所有有症状的胆囊疾病患者在充分评估并取得知情同意后行选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术。术中难度计算评分,根据胆囊壁外观颜色、粘连程度、有无解剖异常、能否达到安全的临界视角,将情况分为易、难、极难、极难4个等级。胆囊穿孔、结石滑落、出血、使用额外器械、需要扩大腹壁切口、使用引流和转开手术以及手术干预的持续时间被记录为评估手术困难程度的预测因素。结果:1级168例(66%),2级62例(24%),3级15例(6%),4级10例(4%)。穿孔对分级无显著影响。出血在3年级和4年级更为常见。使用附属设备是完成4级手术的强制性要求,同时还需要延长上腹部端口,并需要放置排水管。2例(0.7%)转为开腹胆囊切除术,均属于3级和4级。完成手术所需的时间在3年级和4年级明显较高。结论:该改进的分级评分可以为报告腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术发现和技术难点提供工具,使外科医生了解情况的严重性,并采取有效措施克服困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信