Ruminal degradation and intestinal digestibility of camelina meal and carinata meal compared with other protein sources

R.D. Lawrence, J.L. Anderson
{"title":"Ruminal degradation and intestinal digestibility of camelina meal and carinata meal compared with other protein sources","authors":"R.D. Lawrence,&nbsp;J.L. Anderson","doi":"10.15232/pas.2017-01647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Production of reneweable feedstocks for biodiesel<span><span> have drawn attention to alternative oilseed crops. Our objective was to determine DM and CP ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of camelina meal (CAM) and carinata meal (CAR), compared with </span>canola meal<span> (CAN), linseed meal<span><span> (LIN), soybean meal (SBM), and distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) as controls. In situ degradability measurements were done using 3 multiparous, mid-late lactation ruminally cannulated </span>Holstein cows. Sample bags were ruminally incubated in duplicate for each cow and feedstuff for 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h and in triplicate for 24 and 48 h. Eight bags of each feed were incubated at 12 h for use of the residues in determination of in vitro intestinal digestibility. Ruminal particulate passage rate averaged 6.0%/h. Rate of DM degradation was greatest (</span></span></span></span><em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) for CAM and LIN and least for DDGS, whereas CAR and SBM were similar. Ruminally degradable DM was greatest (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) in CAM, CAR, and SBM. The CAM and CAR had the greatest (<em>P</em><span> &lt; 0.05) RDP and least RUP. Intestinal digestible protein was similar (</span><em>P</em> &gt; 0.05) for LIN, CAM, and CAR, which was greater (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) than CAN and DDGS. Intestinally absorbable digestible protein was least for CAM and CAR (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) compared with the other feeds. Total digestible protein was similar (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05) for CAM and CAR compared with SBM and LIN. Results indicate that CAM and CAR are highly degradable and comparable to SBM and LIN for protein utilization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22841,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Animal Scientist","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 10-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2017-01647","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Animal Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618300020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Production of reneweable feedstocks for biodiesel have drawn attention to alternative oilseed crops. Our objective was to determine DM and CP ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of camelina meal (CAM) and carinata meal (CAR), compared with canola meal (CAN), linseed meal (LIN), soybean meal (SBM), and distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) as controls. In situ degradability measurements were done using 3 multiparous, mid-late lactation ruminally cannulated Holstein cows. Sample bags were ruminally incubated in duplicate for each cow and feedstuff for 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h and in triplicate for 24 and 48 h. Eight bags of each feed were incubated at 12 h for use of the residues in determination of in vitro intestinal digestibility. Ruminal particulate passage rate averaged 6.0%/h. Rate of DM degradation was greatest (P < 0.05) for CAM and LIN and least for DDGS, whereas CAR and SBM were similar. Ruminally degradable DM was greatest (P < 0.01) in CAM, CAR, and SBM. The CAM and CAR had the greatest (P < 0.05) RDP and least RUP. Intestinal digestible protein was similar (P > 0.05) for LIN, CAM, and CAR, which was greater (P < 0.05) than CAN and DDGS. Intestinally absorbable digestible protein was least for CAM and CAR (P < 0.01) compared with the other feeds. Total digestible protein was similar (P > 0.05) for CAM and CAR compared with SBM and LIN. Results indicate that CAM and CAR are highly degradable and comparable to SBM and LIN for protein utilization.

与其他蛋白质源相比,亚麻荠粕和胭脂鱼粕的瘤胃降解率和肠道消化率
可再生生物柴油原料的生产引起了人们对替代油籽作物的关注。本试验的目的是测定亚麻荠粕(CAM)和胭脂鱼粕(CAR)的DM和CP瘤胃降解率和肠道消化率,并与菜籽粕(CAN)、亚麻籽粕(LIN)、豆粕(SBM)和酒糟干颗粒及可溶物(DDGS)作为对照。采用3头多产、泌乳中后期瘤胃插管的荷斯坦奶牛进行原位降解性测定。每头奶牛和饲料的样品袋在瘤胃内孵育0、2、4、8和12 h,每头奶牛和饲料的样品袋分别孵育2、4、8和12 h,每头奶牛的样品袋分别孵育24和48 h。每种饲料各孵育8袋,孵育12 h,利用残留物测定体外肠道消化率。瘤胃颗粒通过率平均为6.0%/h。DM降解率最高(P <CAM和LIN的差异为0.05),DDGS的差异最小,而CAR和SBM的差异相似。瘤胃可降解DM最大(P <CAM、CAR和SBM均为0.01)。CAM和CAR的P <0.05) RDP和最少RUP。肠道可消化蛋白相似(P >0.05),而LIN、CAM和CAR的差异更大(P <0.05),高于CAN和DDGS。CAM和CAR的可消化蛋白含量最低(P <0.01)。总可消化蛋白相似(P >与SBM和LIN相比,CAM和CAR的含量为0.05)。结果表明,CAM和CAR具有高度可降解性,在蛋白质利用方面与SBM和LIN相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信