Bullous pemphigoid induced by biologic drugs in psoriasis: a systematic review.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Journal of Dermatological Treatment Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-20 DOI:10.1080/09546634.2022.2089331
Husein Husein-ElAhmed, Martin Steinhoff
{"title":"Bullous pemphigoid induced by biologic drugs in psoriasis: a systematic review.","authors":"Husein Husein-ElAhmed, Martin Steinhoff","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2022.2089331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several therapies for psoriasis have been described as triggers of biologic-induced bullous pemphigoid (BIBP). The real incidence of BIBP in psoriatic patients is still unknown. Hence, we compilated and analyzed current literature to identify the frequency and burden of this adverse event for psoriasis patients treated with biologics.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>We systematically searched literature records involving psoriatic patients developing BIBP. Electronic searches were conducted in Pubmed, EMBASE and Scopus in April 2021. To assess the causal relationship between BP and the biologic drug, we applied the Naranjo adverse reaction probability scale and the Karch-Lasagna algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our systematic review identified 586 records through the three electronic databases. We identified 15 case reports of BIBP. These cases implicated two cases induced by adalimumab, three by efalizumab, three by etanercept, six by ustekinumab, and one case by secukinumab. Mean period of latency until the BIBP developed was time 5.12 ± 3.44 weeks for TNF-α blockers, and 28.66 ± 26.27 weeks for ustekinumab (<i>p</i> = .09). Most of the cases were assessed as \"probable\" consistently in both the Naranjo scale and the Karch-Lasagna algorithm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work presents an accurate estimation on the frequency and burden of BIBP. Ustekinumab presents with the largest evidence of BIBP, especially in patients with previous failure to TNF-α agents. Distinct patterns in the cytokinic pathways and clinical course exist between the BP induced by TNF-α blockers and ustekinumab. A close monitoring of skin condition is highly advisable in patients receiving biologic therapies for psoriasis. Knowledge of BIBP is of great importance to determine the preventive measures and select optimal treatment options.What's already known about this topic?The widespread use of biologic drugs has led dermatologists to encounter increasing situations of biologic-induced BP (BIBP).A lack of data exists on the real incidence of BIBP in psoriatic patients.BIBP is an important adverse event to know when managing patients with psoriasis using biologics.What does this study add?This work presents an accurate estimation on the raised burden of BIBP.Ustekinumab presents with the largest evidence of BIBP, especially in patients with previous failure to TNF-α agents.Mean period of latency until the BIBP developed was time 5.12 ± 3.44 weeks for TNF-α blockers, and 28.66 ± 26.27 weeks for ustekinumab.Distinct patterns in the cytokine pathways and clinical course exist between the BP induced by TNF-α blockers and ustekinumab.A careful screening of previous history of bullous diseases and a baseline immunologic study in psoriatic patients should be advisable prior to commencing any biologic therapy.A close monitoring of skin condition is highly advisable in patients receiving biologic therapies for psoriasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","volume":"22 1","pages":"2886-2893"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2089331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Several therapies for psoriasis have been described as triggers of biologic-induced bullous pemphigoid (BIBP). The real incidence of BIBP in psoriatic patients is still unknown. Hence, we compilated and analyzed current literature to identify the frequency and burden of this adverse event for psoriasis patients treated with biologics.

Material and method: We systematically searched literature records involving psoriatic patients developing BIBP. Electronic searches were conducted in Pubmed, EMBASE and Scopus in April 2021. To assess the causal relationship between BP and the biologic drug, we applied the Naranjo adverse reaction probability scale and the Karch-Lasagna algorithm.

Results: Our systematic review identified 586 records through the three electronic databases. We identified 15 case reports of BIBP. These cases implicated two cases induced by adalimumab, three by efalizumab, three by etanercept, six by ustekinumab, and one case by secukinumab. Mean period of latency until the BIBP developed was time 5.12 ± 3.44 weeks for TNF-α blockers, and 28.66 ± 26.27 weeks for ustekinumab (p = .09). Most of the cases were assessed as "probable" consistently in both the Naranjo scale and the Karch-Lasagna algorithm.

Conclusion: This work presents an accurate estimation on the frequency and burden of BIBP. Ustekinumab presents with the largest evidence of BIBP, especially in patients with previous failure to TNF-α agents. Distinct patterns in the cytokinic pathways and clinical course exist between the BP induced by TNF-α blockers and ustekinumab. A close monitoring of skin condition is highly advisable in patients receiving biologic therapies for psoriasis. Knowledge of BIBP is of great importance to determine the preventive measures and select optimal treatment options.What's already known about this topic?The widespread use of biologic drugs has led dermatologists to encounter increasing situations of biologic-induced BP (BIBP).A lack of data exists on the real incidence of BIBP in psoriatic patients.BIBP is an important adverse event to know when managing patients with psoriasis using biologics.What does this study add?This work presents an accurate estimation on the raised burden of BIBP.Ustekinumab presents with the largest evidence of BIBP, especially in patients with previous failure to TNF-α agents.Mean period of latency until the BIBP developed was time 5.12 ± 3.44 weeks for TNF-α blockers, and 28.66 ± 26.27 weeks for ustekinumab.Distinct patterns in the cytokine pathways and clinical course exist between the BP induced by TNF-α blockers and ustekinumab.A careful screening of previous history of bullous diseases and a baseline immunologic study in psoriatic patients should be advisable prior to commencing any biologic therapy.A close monitoring of skin condition is highly advisable in patients receiving biologic therapies for psoriasis.

生物药物诱导牛皮癣大疱性类天疱疮:系统综述。
简介:几种治疗牛皮癣的方法被描述为触发生物诱导的大疱性类天疱疮(BIBP)。银屑病患者中BIBP的真实发生率尚不清楚。因此,我们整理并分析了目前的文献,以确定使用生物制剂治疗的银屑病患者发生这种不良事件的频率和负担。材料和方法:我们系统地检索了有关银屑病患者发生BIBP的文献记录。于2021年4月在Pubmed、EMBASE和Scopus中进行了电子检索。为了评估BP与生物药物之间的因果关系,我们采用了Naranjo不良反应概率量表和Karch-Lasagna算法。结果:我们的系统评价通过三个电子数据库识别了586条记录。我们确定了15例BIBP病例报告。这些病例涉及阿达木单抗诱导的2例,依法利珠单抗诱导的3例,依那西普诱导的3例,ustekinumab诱导的6例和secukinumab诱导的1例。TNF-α阻滞剂的平均潜伏期为5.12±3.44周,ustekinumab的平均潜伏期为28.66±26.27周(p = 0.09)。大多数病例在Naranjo量表和Karch-Lasagna算法中都被一致地评估为“可能”。结论:本研究对BIBP的频率和负担进行了准确的估计。乌斯特金单抗具有最大的BIBP证据,特别是在先前TNF-α药物治疗失败的患者中。TNF-α阻滞剂和ustekinumab诱导的BP在细胞动力学途径和临床过程中存在不同的模式。在接受银屑病生物治疗的患者中,密切监测皮肤状况是非常可取的。了解BIBP对确定预防措施和选择最佳治疗方案非常重要。关于这个话题我们已经知道了什么?生物药物的广泛使用导致皮肤科医生越来越多地遇到生物诱发性BP (BIBP)的情况。银屑病患者BIBP的真实发生率缺乏相关数据。当使用生物制剂治疗银屑病患者时,BIBP是一个重要的不良事件。这项研究补充了什么?本文对BIBP增加的负担进行了准确的估计。乌斯特金单抗具有最大的BIBP证据,特别是在先前TNF-α药物治疗失败的患者中。TNF-α阻滞剂的平均潜伏期为5.12±3.44周,ustekinumab的平均潜伏期为28.66±26.27周。TNF-α阻滞剂和ustekinumab诱导的BP在细胞因子通路和临床过程中存在不同的模式。在银屑病患者开始任何生物治疗之前,应仔细筛查既往大疱性疾病病史并进行基线免疫研究。在接受银屑病生物治疗的患者中,密切监测皮肤状况是非常可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dermatological Treatment covers all aspects of the treatment of skin disease, including the use of topical and systematically administered drugs and other forms of therapy. The Journal of Dermatological Treatment is positioned to give dermatologists cutting edge information on new treatments in all areas of dermatology. It also publishes valuable clinical reviews and theoretical papers on dermatological treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信