Comparison between peak and average current mode control of improved bridgeless flyback rectifier with bidirectional switch

V. Ramya Chandranadhan, G. Renjini
{"title":"Comparison between peak and average current mode control of improved bridgeless flyback rectifier with bidirectional switch","authors":"V. Ramya Chandranadhan, G. Renjini","doi":"10.1109/TAPENERGY.2015.7229627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares peak and average current mode control of flyback rectifier with bidirectional switch. The control schemes employs an outer voltage feedback loop, which maintains the output voltage as constant and an inner loop, which sense the input current. Average and peak current mode control of flyback rectifier is suitable for obtaining a regulated output voltage with a varying input. Voltage equivalent of input current is averaged by using high gain current error amplifier, which again compared with the reference voltage in the case of average current mode control. But in the case of peak current mode control, peak inductor current has been sensed and this gives rise to many serious problems, including poor noise immunity, a need for slope compensation, and peak-to-average current errors which the inherently low current loop gain cannot correct. Reference voltage is produced by multiplying the rectified input voltage with the error output voltage. These control methods obtain better line and load regulation with the addition of inner current loop compared with voltage mode control. Also the rectified input voltage feedback achieves better input power factor. Conventional flyback rectifier is the inter connection of a diode bridge rectifier in the input side and a flyback converter. In order to obtain a highly efficient flyback rectifier with fewer losses an improved flyback rectifier is introduced. Improved bridgeless flyback rectifier only introduces a switch with common gate drive, a diode and an additional winding in the secondary side. Thus the weight of the converter is not affected with these additional components. Proposed peak and average current mode control can be used as an adapter. Design details of average current mode control also discussed and simulation and hardware results are presented.","PeriodicalId":6552,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Technological Advancements in Power and Energy (TAP Energy)","volume":"10 1","pages":"254-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Technological Advancements in Power and Energy (TAP Energy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAPENERGY.2015.7229627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper compares peak and average current mode control of flyback rectifier with bidirectional switch. The control schemes employs an outer voltage feedback loop, which maintains the output voltage as constant and an inner loop, which sense the input current. Average and peak current mode control of flyback rectifier is suitable for obtaining a regulated output voltage with a varying input. Voltage equivalent of input current is averaged by using high gain current error amplifier, which again compared with the reference voltage in the case of average current mode control. But in the case of peak current mode control, peak inductor current has been sensed and this gives rise to many serious problems, including poor noise immunity, a need for slope compensation, and peak-to-average current errors which the inherently low current loop gain cannot correct. Reference voltage is produced by multiplying the rectified input voltage with the error output voltage. These control methods obtain better line and load regulation with the addition of inner current loop compared with voltage mode control. Also the rectified input voltage feedback achieves better input power factor. Conventional flyback rectifier is the inter connection of a diode bridge rectifier in the input side and a flyback converter. In order to obtain a highly efficient flyback rectifier with fewer losses an improved flyback rectifier is introduced. Improved bridgeless flyback rectifier only introduces a switch with common gate drive, a diode and an additional winding in the secondary side. Thus the weight of the converter is not affected with these additional components. Proposed peak and average current mode control can be used as an adapter. Design details of average current mode control also discussed and simulation and hardware results are presented.
带双向开关的改进型无桥反激整流器峰值与平均电流模式控制比较
本文比较了采用双向开关的反激整流器的峰值电流模式和平均电流模式控制。该控制方案采用外部电压反馈环和内环,前者保持输出电压恒定,后者检测输入电流。反激整流器的平均和峰值电流模式控制适用于在变化输入条件下获得稳压输出电压。采用高增益电流误差放大器对输入电流的电压当量进行平均,再与平均电流模式控制下的参考电压进行比较。但在峰值电流模式控制的情况下,感应到峰值电感电流,这会产生许多严重的问题,包括抗噪性差,需要斜率补偿,以及固有的低电流环路增益无法纠正的峰值-平均电流误差。参考电压由整流输入电压乘以误差输出电压产生。这些控制方法与电压模式控制相比,增加了电流内环,获得了更好的线路和负载调节。整流输入电压反馈也能获得更好的输入功率因数。传统的反激整流器是由输入端的二极管桥式整流器和反激变换器互连而成。为了获得效率高、损耗少的反激整流器,提出了一种改进型反激整流器。改进的无桥反激整流器只引入了一个带有共同栅极驱动的开关,一个二极管和在二次侧的附加绕组。因此,转换器的重量不受这些附加组件的影响。建议的峰值和平均电流模式控制可以用作适配器。讨论了平均电流模式控制的设计细节,给出了仿真和硬件结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信