Clogging and rehabilitation performance of pervious concrete

IF 1.3 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
M. Nazeer, K. Kapoor, S. Singh
{"title":"Clogging and rehabilitation performance of pervious concrete","authors":"M. Nazeer, K. Kapoor, S. Singh","doi":"10.1680/jcoma.22.00099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of pervious concrete was observed for different cloggers like Sand (S), Clay (C) and their combination (S&C). The clogging potential of pervious concrete was determined by simulating natural clogging conditions on cylindrical specimens with a sediment load of 50, 150, and 200 grammes for S, C, and combined S & C laden runoff cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study was extended to observe the recovery rate of infiltration using rehabilitation techniques such as vacuuming (V), Pressure Washing (P) and Vacuuming Followed by Pressure Washing (VP). It was observed from the results that combined (S & C) clogger shows overall critical results of clogging as 80% of the clogging was seen in 3 to 4 cycles. However, cloggers S and C shows 80% of clogging after 7 and 8 cycles. Moreover, among rehabilitation techniques, V shows average recovery rate of 52%, 75% and 76% for C, S and S & C cloggers. An average recovery rate of 63%, 71%, and 71% was seen for C, S and S & C cloggers on applying P technique. However, VP shows a maximum recovery rate of 78%, 77% and 64% against C, S and S & C cloggers.","PeriodicalId":51787,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jcoma.22.00099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of pervious concrete was observed for different cloggers like Sand (S), Clay (C) and their combination (S&C). The clogging potential of pervious concrete was determined by simulating natural clogging conditions on cylindrical specimens with a sediment load of 50, 150, and 200 grammes for S, C, and combined S & C laden runoff cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study was extended to observe the recovery rate of infiltration using rehabilitation techniques such as vacuuming (V), Pressure Washing (P) and Vacuuming Followed by Pressure Washing (VP). It was observed from the results that combined (S & C) clogger shows overall critical results of clogging as 80% of the clogging was seen in 3 to 4 cycles. However, cloggers S and C shows 80% of clogging after 7 and 8 cycles. Moreover, among rehabilitation techniques, V shows average recovery rate of 52%, 75% and 76% for C, S and S & C cloggers. An average recovery rate of 63%, 71%, and 71% was seen for C, S and S & C cloggers on applying P technique. However, VP shows a maximum recovery rate of 78%, 77% and 64% against C, S and S & C cloggers.
透水混凝土的堵塞与修复性能
观察了不同堵塞物如砂(S)、粘土(C)及其组合物(S&C)对透水混凝土性能的影响。透水混凝土的堵塞潜力是通过模拟圆柱形试件的自然堵塞条件来确定的,分别为50、150和200克的泥沙荷载,S、C和S、C组合径流循环。在此基础上,进一步采用真空(V)、压力洗涤(P)和真空后压力洗涤(VP)等修复技术观察浸润的回收率。从结果中可以观察到,综合(S和C)堵塞显示了堵塞的总体关键结果,因为80%的堵塞在3到4个循环中出现。然而,堵塞器S和C在7和8个循环后显示80%堵塞。此外,在康复技术中,C、S和s&c cloggers的V平均康复率分别为52%、75%和76%。应用P技术对C、S和s&c堵塞剂的平均回收率分别为63%、71%和71%。然而,VP对C、S和s&c堵塞剂的最大回收率分别为78%、77%和64%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信