{"title":"Ending the Budget Wars: Funding the Humanities during a Crisis in Higher Education","authors":"Christopher Newfield","doi":"10.1632/PROF.2009.2009.1.270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The year 2008 ended badly for finance, manufacturing, and the rest of the economy in the United States and abroad. The same can be said for higher education. The richest university in the world, Harvard, lost over 22% of its endowment in four months, prompting a hiring freeze that echoed those at other major universities (Fabrikant; see also Moran and Wiedeman). A series of dire reports also appeared. Measuring Up 2008 gave 49 of 50 states an F in affordability (Natl. Center). Trends in Student Aid 2008 noted that student borrowing has doubled in the last decade (in constant dollars) and that the market share of commercial loans has quadrupled (Coll. Board). The crisis in affordability has accelerated shocking declines in educational attainment: for the first time in United States history, younger people are less educated than their baby-boom parents (Natl. Center; Coll. Board, figs. 1–4).1 In California, where per-student state funding for the University of California has now fallen about 65% since 1990 (corrected for inflation), the college participation rate of nineteen-year-olds fell from 43% to 30% in just eight years (1996–2004), a drop that may be one of the quickest in education in the modern history of wealthy nations (Newfield, Bohn, Moore, and Glantz; Mortenson).2 Last but not least, the MLA’ s employment report Education in the Balance shows that the permanent workforce in English has continued to be supplemented with adjunct and other contingent teaching labor. The higher education funding model is","PeriodicalId":86631,"journal":{"name":"The Osteopathic profession","volume":"63 1","pages":"270-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Osteopathic profession","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1632/PROF.2009.2009.1.270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Abstract
The year 2008 ended badly for finance, manufacturing, and the rest of the economy in the United States and abroad. The same can be said for higher education. The richest university in the world, Harvard, lost over 22% of its endowment in four months, prompting a hiring freeze that echoed those at other major universities (Fabrikant; see also Moran and Wiedeman). A series of dire reports also appeared. Measuring Up 2008 gave 49 of 50 states an F in affordability (Natl. Center). Trends in Student Aid 2008 noted that student borrowing has doubled in the last decade (in constant dollars) and that the market share of commercial loans has quadrupled (Coll. Board). The crisis in affordability has accelerated shocking declines in educational attainment: for the first time in United States history, younger people are less educated than their baby-boom parents (Natl. Center; Coll. Board, figs. 1–4).1 In California, where per-student state funding for the University of California has now fallen about 65% since 1990 (corrected for inflation), the college participation rate of nineteen-year-olds fell from 43% to 30% in just eight years (1996–2004), a drop that may be one of the quickest in education in the modern history of wealthy nations (Newfield, Bohn, Moore, and Glantz; Mortenson).2 Last but not least, the MLA’ s employment report Education in the Balance shows that the permanent workforce in English has continued to be supplemented with adjunct and other contingent teaching labor. The higher education funding model is
2008年对美国和其他国家的金融、制造业和其他经济部门来说都是糟糕的一年。高等教育也是如此。世界上最富有的大学哈佛大学在四个月内损失了超过22%的捐赠,导致其他主要大学的招聘冻结(Fabrikant;参见Moran and Wiedeman)。同时出现了一系列可怕的报道。2008年,全美50个州中有49个州在负担能力方面得分为F。中心)。《2008年学生援助趋势》指出,在过去十年中,学生贷款翻了一番(以不变美元计算),商业贷款的市场份额翻了两番。板)。负担能力危机加速了受教育程度的惊人下降:在美国历史上,年轻人的受教育程度第一次低于他们在婴儿潮时期出生的父母。中心;科尔。,无花果。1 - 4) 1。在加州,自1990年以来,加州大学的每个学生的州资助已经下降了约65%(扣除通货膨胀因素),19岁学生的大学入学率在短短8年(1996-2004年)从43%下降到30%,这可能是富裕国家现代教育史上下降最快的一次(Newfield, Bohn, Moore, and Glantz;摩顿森)。2最后但并非最不重要的是,MLA的就业报告《平衡中的教育》显示,英语专业的永久劳动力继续被兼职和其他临时教学劳动力所补充。高等教育的资助模式是