Verandering in de intensiteit van mantelzorg tijdens de eerste COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 in Nederland

Q4 Social Sciences
Ellen Verbakel, Klara Raiber, A. Boer
{"title":"Verandering in de intensiteit van mantelzorg tijdens de eerste COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 in Nederland","authors":"Ellen Verbakel, Klara Raiber, A. Boer","doi":"10.5117/mem2021.3.006.verb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Changes in informal care provision during the first COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 in the Netherlands\n \n \n This study investigates to what extent the intensity of informal care provision has changed during the first lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring of 2020 in the Netherlands, whether these changes differed by the living situation of the care recipient, and whether these changes were associated with changes in indicators for ‘being able to’, ‘have to’ and ‘want to’ provide care (determinants of the Informal Care Model). We collected data in July 2020 among informal caregivers aged 78 and younger who indicated to provide care in March 2020 in the LISS-panel (N = 1,270 care situation of 1,014 caregivers). We found that, on average, informal care provision was reduced during the lockdown; caregivers of care recipients living in care institutions were the most likely to reduce or stop caregiving, and caregivers who helped someone in their own household were most likely to have increased their intensity. Feeling less restricted by the corona measures reduced the likelihood to stop or lower care provision and increased the likelihood of increasing care; being confronted with a reduction of formal care for the care recipient was related to a higher likelihood of increasing care; and stronger concerns about the care recipient increased the likelihood of intensifying care and prevented from stopping or reducing care. We conclude that the COVID-19 measures significantly impacted the amount of informal care provision and that the Informal Care Model provides a useful basis for explaining changes in informal care intensity.","PeriodicalId":35265,"journal":{"name":"Mens en Maatschappij","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mens en Maatschappij","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/mem2021.3.006.verb","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Changes in informal care provision during the first COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 in the Netherlands This study investigates to what extent the intensity of informal care provision has changed during the first lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring of 2020 in the Netherlands, whether these changes differed by the living situation of the care recipient, and whether these changes were associated with changes in indicators for ‘being able to’, ‘have to’ and ‘want to’ provide care (determinants of the Informal Care Model). We collected data in July 2020 among informal caregivers aged 78 and younger who indicated to provide care in March 2020 in the LISS-panel (N = 1,270 care situation of 1,014 caregivers). We found that, on average, informal care provision was reduced during the lockdown; caregivers of care recipients living in care institutions were the most likely to reduce or stop caregiving, and caregivers who helped someone in their own household were most likely to have increased their intensity. Feeling less restricted by the corona measures reduced the likelihood to stop or lower care provision and increased the likelihood of increasing care; being confronted with a reduction of formal care for the care recipient was related to a higher likelihood of increasing care; and stronger concerns about the care recipient increased the likelihood of intensifying care and prevented from stopping or reducing care. We conclude that the COVID-19 measures significantly impacted the amount of informal care provision and that the Informal Care Model provides a useful basis for explaining changes in informal care intensity.
在荷兰2020年第一次COVID-19封锁期间,护理强度的变化
本研究调查了在荷兰2020年春季COVID-19大流行导致的第一次封锁期间,非正式护理提供的强度在多大程度上发生了变化,这些变化是否因护理接受者的生活状况而不同,以及这些变化是否与“能够”的指标变化有关。“必须”和“想要”提供护理(非正式护理模式的决定因素)。我们于2020年7月收集了在liss面板中表示将于2020年3月提供护理的78岁及以下非正式护理人员的数据(N = 1,014名护理人员的1,270名护理情况)。我们发现,在封锁期间,非正式护理的提供平均减少了;生活在护理机构的照顾者最有可能减少或停止照顾,而帮助自己家中某人的照顾者最有可能增加他们的照顾强度。感到受冠状病毒措施限制较少,减少了停止或减少提供护理的可能性,并增加了增加护理的可能性;接受护理者面临的正规护理减少与增加护理的可能性较高有关;对受照顾者的强烈关注增加了加强照顾的可能性,并阻止了停止或减少照顾。我们得出结论,COVID-19措施显著影响了非正规护理提供的数量,非正规护理模型为解释非正规护理强度的变化提供了有用的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mens en Maatschappij
Mens en Maatschappij Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Mens en Maatschappij is een Nederlandstalig tijdschrift voor sociale wetenschappen. Het biedt het beste en breedste begrip van de actuele ontwikkelingen binnen de sociale wetenschappen en sociologie. De redactie selecteert artikelen op wetenschappelijke kwaliteit en actualiteit. Alle artikelen worden onderworpen aan een peer-reviewproces. Het tijdschrift is geen spreekbuis van een bepaalde richting of stroming, maar staat open voor elke bijdrage op wetenschappelijk niveau. Naast de reguliere nummers verschijnt ieder jaar een themanummer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信