Profits First, Safety Second

IF 0.5 4区 经济学 Q1 HISTORY
Jason Foster, Susan Cake, B. Barnetson
{"title":"Profits First, Safety Second","authors":"Jason Foster, Susan Cake, B. Barnetson","doi":"10.52975/llt.2022v90.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that while workplaces are safer today than they were 50 years ago, the degree to which this change is due to Canada’s occupational health and safety (ohs) system is unclear. Examining the literature and reflecting upon the authors’ own experiences with workplace safety, the article suggests that fundamental flaws embedded in the principles of the system undermine its effectiveness at keeping workers safe. Specifically, the premise of joint responsibility – which is given life in the internal responsibility system (irs) – appears to ignore the conflicting interests and unequal power relations that exist in Canadian workplaces. The circumstances that contributed to the historical effectiveness of the irs no longer exist, undermining the ability of workers to realize safe and healthy workplaces.","PeriodicalId":33140,"journal":{"name":"Labour-Le Travail","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour-Le Travail","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52975/llt.2022v90.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues that while workplaces are safer today than they were 50 years ago, the degree to which this change is due to Canada’s occupational health and safety (ohs) system is unclear. Examining the literature and reflecting upon the authors’ own experiences with workplace safety, the article suggests that fundamental flaws embedded in the principles of the system undermine its effectiveness at keeping workers safe. Specifically, the premise of joint responsibility – which is given life in the internal responsibility system (irs) – appears to ignore the conflicting interests and unequal power relations that exist in Canadian workplaces. The circumstances that contributed to the historical effectiveness of the irs no longer exist, undermining the ability of workers to realize safe and healthy workplaces.
利润第一,安全第二
本文认为,虽然今天的工作场所比50年前更安全,但这种变化在多大程度上归因于加拿大的职业健康和安全(ohs)体系尚不清楚。通过研究文献和反思作者自己在工作场所安全方面的经验,这篇文章表明,该制度原则中存在的根本缺陷削弱了其保护工人安全的有效性。具体来说,共同责任的前提- -在内部责任制度中被赋予生命- -似乎忽视了加拿大工作场所中存在的利益冲突和不平等的权力关系。促进劳工法在历史上发挥效力的情况已不复存在,损害了工人实现安全和健康工作场所的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Labour-Le Travail
Labour-Le Travail Multiple-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信