Fostering Delight in Difference

Q2 Arts and Humanities
B. Brock
{"title":"Fostering Delight in Difference","authors":"B. Brock","doi":"10.1080/23312521.2022.2049429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kate Bowman-Evans suggests that the exegetical procedure I pursue in Wondrously Wounded is one that is promising for that church that seeks to navigate its relationships with all sorts of people who have been socially marginalized more faithfully. By offering Christians an alternative exegetical procedure to the sorts of biblical scholarship that dominates theological education today, I allow the church to face its scriptures more self-criti-cally. A more self-critical reading is one that is aware that the readings of others are essential to a church that is together plumbing the fullness of scripture and the Christian tradition. I am grateful for Bowman-Evan’s attention to this strand of the book, which I not only affirm but would like in this response to make even more explicit.","PeriodicalId":38120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Disability and Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Disability and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2022.2049429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kate Bowman-Evans suggests that the exegetical procedure I pursue in Wondrously Wounded is one that is promising for that church that seeks to navigate its relationships with all sorts of people who have been socially marginalized more faithfully. By offering Christians an alternative exegetical procedure to the sorts of biblical scholarship that dominates theological education today, I allow the church to face its scriptures more self-criti-cally. A more self-critical reading is one that is aware that the readings of others are essential to a church that is together plumbing the fullness of scripture and the Christian tradition. I am grateful for Bowman-Evan’s attention to this strand of the book, which I not only affirm but would like in this response to make even more explicit.
在差异中培养快乐
凯特·鲍曼-埃文斯认为,我在《奇妙受伤》一书中所追求的训诂程序,对于教会来说是一种很有希望的方法,它试图更忠实地处理与各种被社会边缘化的人的关系。通过向基督徒提供一种可替代的解经程序,以取代今天主导神学教育的《圣经》学术,我允许教会以更自我批判的态度面对圣经。一种更自我批判的阅读是一种意识到别人的阅读对一个教会来说是必不可少的,这个教会正在一起探索圣经和基督教传统的完整性。我很感谢鲍曼-埃文对书中这部分内容的关注,我不仅肯定这一点,而且希望在这篇回应中更加明确地表达这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Disability and Religion
Journal of Disability and Religion Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信