Self-legitimacy of police officers in Slovenia

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Rok Hacin, Gorazd Meško
{"title":"Self-legitimacy of police officers in Slovenia","authors":"Rok Hacin, Gorazd Meško","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm-01-2021-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn recent years, several studies on self-legitimacy of police officers were conducted; however, few have tested the unstable nature of legitimacy in different time periods. This paper aims to focus on the self-legitimacy of police officers and its impact on pro-organizational behavior in 2013 and 2016.Design/methodology/approachThe study took place in eight regional police directorates in Slovenia. The number of participants amounted to 529 police officers in 2013 and 478 police officers in 2016 that have completed a paper and pencil survey that was pretested using a convenience sample of police officers studying as part-time undergraduate students.FindingsOverall findings revealed organizational commitment as the strongest predictor of self-legitimacy of police officers in Slovenia. The invariance of the “core variables” and their influence on the self-legitimacy of police officers in different time periods was confirmed. Their perception of individual legitimacy, organizational commitment, education and years of service influenced pro-organizational behaviors of police officers.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations of the study can be seen in the sincerity of participating police officers and the nature of self-legitimacy, which operates differently in different societies.Practical implicationsThe results could be used for the improvement of policing in a young democratic country.Social implicationsLegitimacy, procedural justice and other components of policing in a democratic society need to be tested globally, especially in young democracies. This study is an example of an ongoing, follow-up endeavor of researchers and the national police to reflect upon the development of policing.Originality/valueThe paper has confirmed the invariance of relations with colleagues, supervisors' procedural justice and audience legitimacy on the self-legitimacy in different time periods and societies.","PeriodicalId":47881,"journal":{"name":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-01-2021-0013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeIn recent years, several studies on self-legitimacy of police officers were conducted; however, few have tested the unstable nature of legitimacy in different time periods. This paper aims to focus on the self-legitimacy of police officers and its impact on pro-organizational behavior in 2013 and 2016.Design/methodology/approachThe study took place in eight regional police directorates in Slovenia. The number of participants amounted to 529 police officers in 2013 and 478 police officers in 2016 that have completed a paper and pencil survey that was pretested using a convenience sample of police officers studying as part-time undergraduate students.FindingsOverall findings revealed organizational commitment as the strongest predictor of self-legitimacy of police officers in Slovenia. The invariance of the “core variables” and their influence on the self-legitimacy of police officers in different time periods was confirmed. Their perception of individual legitimacy, organizational commitment, education and years of service influenced pro-organizational behaviors of police officers.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations of the study can be seen in the sincerity of participating police officers and the nature of self-legitimacy, which operates differently in different societies.Practical implicationsThe results could be used for the improvement of policing in a young democratic country.Social implicationsLegitimacy, procedural justice and other components of policing in a democratic society need to be tested globally, especially in young democracies. This study is an example of an ongoing, follow-up endeavor of researchers and the national police to reflect upon the development of policing.Originality/valueThe paper has confirmed the invariance of relations with colleagues, supervisors' procedural justice and audience legitimacy on the self-legitimacy in different time periods and societies.
斯洛文尼亚警察的自我合法性
目的近年来,对警务人员自我正当性进行了若干研究;然而,很少有人在不同时期检验合法性的不稳定性。本文旨在关注2013年和2016年警察的自我合法性及其对亲组织行为的影响。设计/方法/办法这项研究在斯洛文尼亚的八个区域警察总局进行。2013年和2016年的参与者分别为529名和478名警察,他们完成了一项纸笔调查,并使用兼职本科学生作为方便样本进行了预测试。总体发现表明,组织承诺是斯洛文尼亚警察自我合法性的最强预测因子。验证了“核心变量”的不变性及其对不同时期警务人员自我正当性的影响。他们对个人合法性、组织承诺、教育程度和服务年限的感知影响警察的亲组织行为。研究的局限性/启示研究的局限性可以从参与警察的诚意和自我合法性的性质中看出,在不同的社会中,自我合法性的运作方式不同。实际意义:研究结果可用于改善一个年轻民主国家的警务工作。民主社会中治安的合法性、程序正义和其他组成部分需要在全球范围内进行检验,特别是在年轻的民主国家。这项研究是研究人员和国家警察反思警务发展的持续、后续努力的一个例子。本文证实了在不同时期、不同社会背景下,同事关系、主管程序正义、受众合法性对自我正当性的不变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: ■Community policing ■Managerial styles and leadership ■Performance measurement and accountability ■Pursuit guidelines ■Crime trends and analysis ■Crisis negotiation ■Civil disorder ■Organized crime ■Victimology ■Crime prevention ■Career development ■High risk police activities ■Routine policing ■Traffic enforcement ■Civil litigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信