Smoke 'Em If You Got 'Em: Discussing the WTO Dispute Settlement Panel's Decision to Uphold Plain Packaging in Australia and Its Impact on the Future

Lucas G. Kelly
{"title":"Smoke 'Em If You Got 'Em: Discussing the WTO Dispute Settlement Panel's Decision to Uphold Plain Packaging in Australia and Its Impact on the Future","authors":"Lucas G. Kelly","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3115849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article discusses the landmark decision by the WTO Dispute Resolution Panel that the Australian Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011 (“TPPA”) is consistent with its obligations to the TBT Agreement, the TRIPS Agreement, and the GATT. It argues that Indonesia’s claim that the TPPA is discriminatory and contrary to its obligation of national treatment is unfounded. Further, it contends that the decision could lead to more products being subjected to plain packaging regulations in the future. Tobacco is, however, unique because of the great health risk involved, and plain packaging of other products to this extent is unlikely. The Article presents evidence of the health risks involved with tobacco use, and discusses why the TPPA falls under an exception to its obligations to the WTO Agreements cited. To conclude, the Article investigates several different products and explains why it is unlikely that the products will be subjected to stringent packaging regulations in the future.","PeriodicalId":83387,"journal":{"name":"UCLA Pacific Basin law journal","volume":"106 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCLA Pacific Basin law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3115849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Article discusses the landmark decision by the WTO Dispute Resolution Panel that the Australian Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011 (“TPPA”) is consistent with its obligations to the TBT Agreement, the TRIPS Agreement, and the GATT. It argues that Indonesia’s claim that the TPPA is discriminatory and contrary to its obligation of national treatment is unfounded. Further, it contends that the decision could lead to more products being subjected to plain packaging regulations in the future. Tobacco is, however, unique because of the great health risk involved, and plain packaging of other products to this extent is unlikely. The Article presents evidence of the health risks involved with tobacco use, and discusses why the TPPA falls under an exception to its obligations to the WTO Agreements cited. To conclude, the Article investigates several different products and explains why it is unlikely that the products will be subjected to stringent packaging regulations in the future.
如果你有烟就抽:讨论WTO争端解决小组在澳大利亚支持普通包装的决定及其对未来的影响
本文讨论了世贸组织争端解决小组作出的具有里程碑意义的决定,即《2011年澳大利亚烟草平装法》(“TPPA”)符合其对《TBT协定》、《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》和《关贸总协定》的义务。它认为,印度尼西亚关于TPPA具有歧视性和违背其国民待遇义务的说法是没有根据的。此外,该公司认为,这一决定可能会导致未来更多的产品受到普通包装法规的约束。然而,烟草是独一无二的,因为它涉及巨大的健康风险,其他产品不太可能进行如此程度的普通包装。这篇文章提出了与烟草使用有关的健康风险的证据,并讨论了为什么TPPA属于其对所引用的WTO协定的义务的例外。总之,文章调查了几种不同的产品,并解释了为什么不太可能的产品将受到严格的包装法规在未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书