Quantification of the Loss Conduit Aperture During Lost Circulation in Fractured Carbonates

A. Ruzhnikov, Ashley Johnson
{"title":"Quantification of the Loss Conduit Aperture During Lost Circulation in Fractured Carbonates","authors":"A. Ruzhnikov, Ashley Johnson","doi":"10.2118/206446-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Fractured carbonate formations around the world are prone to lost circulation that not only affects the well construction process but creating a longtime effect on the wellbore integrity. Despite multiple attempts to cure them the success rate is usually low. This manuscript is aiming to provide a new vision on the reason of lost circulation across carbonates.\n To have better understanding of the complete losses across the fractured carbonates the series of studies were initiated. At first to understand the strength of the loss zone the fracture closing pressure was evaluated via study of the fluid level in the annulus and back-calculation of the drilling fluid density effect on it. Secondary, the rock properties across the loss circulation zones were studied by using the microresistivity images, dip data, and imaging of fluid-saturated porous media. At last, the trial tests with different treatment materials were performed to evaluate the effect of it on curing the losses.\n The results of the studies brought new information and explained some previous unknowns. The formation strength across lost circulation zone was measured and it was confirmed to remain constant despite other changes of the well conduction parameters. It was also confirmed that the carbonates are naturally highly fractured having over 900 fractures along the wellbore. The lost circulation zone was characterized, and it was confirmed that the losses were not related to the fractures but rather to the karst, dissolution and to mega-fractures. The size and dip of the fractures were identified, and it was proven the possibility to treat them with conventional materials. However, the size of identified mega-fractures and karst zones exceed the fractures by 100 times in true vertical depth, and in horizontal wells the difference is thousands times due to measured depth. This new information explains the previous unsuccessful attempts with the conventional lost circulation materials. Further based on the newly available information the mathematic description of the lost circulation zones was provided.","PeriodicalId":10970,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206446-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Fractured carbonate formations around the world are prone to lost circulation that not only affects the well construction process but creating a longtime effect on the wellbore integrity. Despite multiple attempts to cure them the success rate is usually low. This manuscript is aiming to provide a new vision on the reason of lost circulation across carbonates. To have better understanding of the complete losses across the fractured carbonates the series of studies were initiated. At first to understand the strength of the loss zone the fracture closing pressure was evaluated via study of the fluid level in the annulus and back-calculation of the drilling fluid density effect on it. Secondary, the rock properties across the loss circulation zones were studied by using the microresistivity images, dip data, and imaging of fluid-saturated porous media. At last, the trial tests with different treatment materials were performed to evaluate the effect of it on curing the losses. The results of the studies brought new information and explained some previous unknowns. The formation strength across lost circulation zone was measured and it was confirmed to remain constant despite other changes of the well conduction parameters. It was also confirmed that the carbonates are naturally highly fractured having over 900 fractures along the wellbore. The lost circulation zone was characterized, and it was confirmed that the losses were not related to the fractures but rather to the karst, dissolution and to mega-fractures. The size and dip of the fractures were identified, and it was proven the possibility to treat them with conventional materials. However, the size of identified mega-fractures and karst zones exceed the fractures by 100 times in true vertical depth, and in horizontal wells the difference is thousands times due to measured depth. This new information explains the previous unsuccessful attempts with the conventional lost circulation materials. Further based on the newly available information the mathematic description of the lost circulation zones was provided.
裂缝性碳酸盐岩漏失过程中漏失管道孔径的定量分析
世界各地的碳酸盐岩裂缝地层都很容易漏失,这不仅会影响井的施工过程,而且会对井筒完整性产生长期影响。尽管多次尝试治愈,但成功率通常很低。本文旨在为碳酸盐岩漏失的原因提供一个新的视角。为了更好地了解整个碳酸盐岩裂缝的完全损失,开展了一系列研究。为了了解漏失层的强度,首先通过环空液面研究和钻井液密度对其影响的反算来评估裂缝闭合压力。其次,通过利用微电阻率图像、倾角数据和流体饱和多孔介质成像,研究了整个漏失循环带的岩石性质。最后进行了不同处理材料的试验,评价了不同处理材料的处理效果。这些研究的结果带来了新的信息,并解释了一些以前的未知。测量了漏失层的地层强度,并证实尽管其他导井参数发生了变化,地层强度仍保持不变。研究还证实,碳酸盐岩具有天然的高度裂缝性,沿井筒有900多条裂缝。对漏失带进行了表征,证实了漏失与裂缝无关,主要与岩溶、溶蚀和特大裂缝有关。确定了裂缝的大小和倾角,并证明了用常规材料处理裂缝的可能性。然而,已识别的巨型裂缝和岩溶带的大小在垂直深度上超过裂缝的100倍,而在水平井中,由于测量深度的原因,差异达到数千倍。这一新信息解释了之前使用常规漏失材料的失败尝试。在此基础上,给出了漏失层的数学描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信