Psychological Status of Clinical Laboratory Staff During the COVID-19 Outbreak.

Chen Cheng, Ying-Bo Rao, Yun-Rong Lu
{"title":"Psychological Status of Clinical Laboratory Staff During the COVID-19 Outbreak.","authors":"Chen Cheng, Ying-Bo Rao, Yun-Rong Lu","doi":"10.5152/pcp.2021.21847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In early December 2019, during the outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which was first detected in Wuhan, COVID-19 was suspected, detected, and confirmed in an increasing number of patients every day. The clinical laboratory staff have always played an important role in the laboratory diagnosis of patients. Currently, there are many research studies on the mental health of the first-line doctors or nurses managing the COVID-19 outbreak, both domestically and overseas, but data of the mental health and associated factors among the clinical laboratory staff who handle the blood or biological samples of confirmed cases and are consequently exposed to COVID-19 are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey-based study was performed via an online survey in a single designated hospital from April 20 to April 23, 2020 in Yiwu,China. The online survey included questions on sociodemographic and clinical variables. Totally, 45 clinical laboratory staff and 20 nonmedical health workers participated. Mental health variables were assessed via 4 Chinese versions of validated measurement tools : Zung's Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Zung's Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in the SDS and SAS scores, between the clinical laboratory staff and the nonmedical health workers (<i>P</i> < .001, <i>P</i> < .003, respectively). The scores for exposure risk and neuroticism of participants were the main factors influencing both the SDS scores of the clinical laboratory staff (<i>P</i> = .002, <i>P</i> = .005, respectively), and also their SAS scores (<i>P</i> = .003 <i>P</i> = .006, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results showed that a significant proportion of clinical laboratory staff experienced anxiety and depression symptoms. Their scores for mental health problems, exposure risk, and neuroticism were associated with severe symptoms of depression and anxiety. Therefore, the high-risk group of the clinical laboratory staff and those individuals with higher neuroticism scores may need special attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":22164,"journal":{"name":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics","volume":"129 1 1","pages":"206-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11079645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2021.21847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In early December 2019, during the outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which was first detected in Wuhan, COVID-19 was suspected, detected, and confirmed in an increasing number of patients every day. The clinical laboratory staff have always played an important role in the laboratory diagnosis of patients. Currently, there are many research studies on the mental health of the first-line doctors or nurses managing the COVID-19 outbreak, both domestically and overseas, but data of the mental health and associated factors among the clinical laboratory staff who handle the blood or biological samples of confirmed cases and are consequently exposed to COVID-19 are limited.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey-based study was performed via an online survey in a single designated hospital from April 20 to April 23, 2020 in Yiwu,China. The online survey included questions on sociodemographic and clinical variables. Totally, 45 clinical laboratory staff and 20 nonmedical health workers participated. Mental health variables were assessed via 4 Chinese versions of validated measurement tools : Zung's Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Zung's Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ).

Results: Significant differences were observed in the SDS and SAS scores, between the clinical laboratory staff and the nonmedical health workers (P < .001, P < .003, respectively). The scores for exposure risk and neuroticism of participants were the main factors influencing both the SDS scores of the clinical laboratory staff (P = .002, P = .005, respectively), and also their SAS scores (P = .003 P = .006, respectively).

Conclusions: The results showed that a significant proportion of clinical laboratory staff experienced anxiety and depression symptoms. Their scores for mental health problems, exposure risk, and neuroticism were associated with severe symptoms of depression and anxiety. Therefore, the high-risk group of the clinical laboratory staff and those individuals with higher neuroticism scores may need special attention.

COVID-19 爆发期间临床实验室工作人员的心理状况。
背景:2019年12月初,在武汉首次发现严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)疫情期间,每天都有越来越多的患者疑似、检出并确诊COVID-19。临床实验室工作人员在患者的实验室诊断中一直发挥着重要作用。目前,国内外有许多关于处理 COVID-19 疫情的一线医生或护士心理健康的研究,但关于处理确诊病例的血液或生物样本并因此暴露于 COVID-19 的临床实验室工作人员的心理健康及相关因素的数据却很有限:本研究以横断面调查为基础,于 2020 年 4 月 20 日至 4 月 23 日在中国义乌的一家定点医院进行了在线调查。在线调查包括社会人口学和临床变量问题。共有 45 名临床实验室工作人员和 20 名非医务卫生工作者参与了调查。心理健康变量通过4种中文版的有效测量工具进行评估:Zung抑郁自评量表(SDS)、Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和艾森克人格问卷(EPQ):临床实验室工作人员和非医疗卫生工作者的 SDS 和 SAS 分数存在显著差异(分别为 P < .001 和 P < .003)。参与者的暴露风险和神经质评分是影响临床实验室工作人员 SDS 评分(分别为 P = .002 和 P = .005)和 SAS 评分(分别为 P = .003 和 P = .006)的主要因素:结论:研究结果表明,相当一部分临床实验室工作人员有焦虑和抑郁症状。他们在心理健康问题、暴露风险和神经质方面的得分与严重的抑郁和焦虑症状有关。因此,临床实验室工作人员中的高危人群和神经质得分较高的人可能需要特别关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信