{"title":"From Ramos to Rameau","authors":"David E. Cohen","doi":"10.1215/00222909-9534115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article explores the advent of two foundational characteristics of the modern concept of harmony inaugurated by Rameau's Traité de l'harmonie (1722): first, that its principal objects are sonorities of three or more distinct pitch classes, that is, consonant and dissonant chords; and second, that these chords “move” from one to the next in ways determined by certain inherent relations among them, in a process in which dissonances, as well as consonances, play a significant if not crucial role. This article shows that the ancestors of these two fundamental properties of harmony, newly understood as a specifically polyphonic phenomenon, first emerged into theoretical discourse in polemical writings of the Northern Italian theorists Nicolò Burzio (1487), Giovanni Spataro (1491), and Franchino Gaffurio (1496, 1518), sparked by the inflammatory views of Bartolomeo Ramos de Pareia (1482). Moreover, while these ideas about harmony come to cohabit in Gioseffo Zarlino's Istitutioni harmoniche (1558), they were initially proposed not as complementary but as explicitly competing new conceptions of the nature of harmony, advanced to support their authors' polemical positions and attacks on each other.","PeriodicalId":45025,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MUSIC THEORY","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MUSIC THEORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00222909-9534115","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article explores the advent of two foundational characteristics of the modern concept of harmony inaugurated by Rameau's Traité de l'harmonie (1722): first, that its principal objects are sonorities of three or more distinct pitch classes, that is, consonant and dissonant chords; and second, that these chords “move” from one to the next in ways determined by certain inherent relations among them, in a process in which dissonances, as well as consonances, play a significant if not crucial role. This article shows that the ancestors of these two fundamental properties of harmony, newly understood as a specifically polyphonic phenomenon, first emerged into theoretical discourse in polemical writings of the Northern Italian theorists Nicolò Burzio (1487), Giovanni Spataro (1491), and Franchino Gaffurio (1496, 1518), sparked by the inflammatory views of Bartolomeo Ramos de Pareia (1482). Moreover, while these ideas about harmony come to cohabit in Gioseffo Zarlino's Istitutioni harmoniche (1558), they were initially proposed not as complementary but as explicitly competing new conceptions of the nature of harmony, advanced to support their authors' polemical positions and attacks on each other.
本文探讨了由拉莫的《和声trait de l’harmonie》(1722)开创的现代和声概念的两个基本特征:第一,它的主要对象是三个或更多不同音高类别的音,即协和和弦和不协和和弦;第二,这些和弦从一个和弦“移动”到下一个和弦的方式是由它们之间的某些内在关系决定的,在这个过程中,不和谐音和和谐音即使不是至关重要,也起着重要作用。本文表明,这两个和声基本属性的祖先,最近被理解为一种特殊的复调现象,首先出现在意大利北部理论家Nicolò Burzio(1487年),Giovanni Spataro(1491年)和Franchino Gaffurio(1496年,1518年)的论争著作中,由Bartolomeo Ramos de Pareia(1482年)的煽动观点引发。此外,虽然这些关于和谐的观点在Gioseffo Zarlino的《和谐制度》(1558)中共存,但它们最初并不是作为互补的,而是作为明确竞争的和谐本质的新概念提出的,它们是为了支持作者的辩论立场和相互攻击而提出的。