Ready? Set? Go?: Examining Organizational Readiness for Change in a Quality Improvement Intervention for Youth Mentoring Programs

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Renée Spencer, Alison L. Drew, C. Herrera, B. Mcbeath, T. Keller
{"title":"Ready? Set? Go?: Examining Organizational Readiness for Change in a Quality Improvement Intervention for Youth Mentoring Programs","authors":"Renée Spencer, Alison L. Drew, C. Herrera, B. Mcbeath, T. Keller","doi":"10.1086/718516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of youth mentoring programs has risen significantly in recent decades. This trend, coupled with evidence that programs employing a greater number of empirically supported practices achieve more positive effects for youth participants, has prompted increasing interest in how to promote more widespread use of evidence-based practice standards in mentoring programs. In an effort to describe and better understand efforts to implement recommended standards, we studied a multi-level initiative sponsored by a national advocacy organization in which its state-level Affiliates guided local mentoring programs through a structured quality improvement process. Specifically, we examined organizational readiness for change among mentoring program staff as well as among staff from the state-level Affiliates charged with supporting the mentoring programs as they implemented their change process. Analysis of in-depth qualitative interviews with 44 staff indicated that programs and supporting Affiliates were generally highly motivated and committed to the change process. However, because this enthusiasm was not always accompanied by the resources needed to make program change, staff were more measured in their perceptions of change efficacy and noted corresponding challenges that weakened the implementation process. Implications of these findings for practice and future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/718516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of youth mentoring programs has risen significantly in recent decades. This trend, coupled with evidence that programs employing a greater number of empirically supported practices achieve more positive effects for youth participants, has prompted increasing interest in how to promote more widespread use of evidence-based practice standards in mentoring programs. In an effort to describe and better understand efforts to implement recommended standards, we studied a multi-level initiative sponsored by a national advocacy organization in which its state-level Affiliates guided local mentoring programs through a structured quality improvement process. Specifically, we examined organizational readiness for change among mentoring program staff as well as among staff from the state-level Affiliates charged with supporting the mentoring programs as they implemented their change process. Analysis of in-depth qualitative interviews with 44 staff indicated that programs and supporting Affiliates were generally highly motivated and committed to the change process. However, because this enthusiasm was not always accompanied by the resources needed to make program change, staff were more measured in their perceptions of change efficacy and noted corresponding challenges that weakened the implementation process. Implications of these findings for practice and future research are discussed.
准备好了吗?准备好了吗?去了?在青年指导计划的质量改进干预中检查组织对变革的准备程度
近几十年来,青年辅导项目的数量显著增加。这一趋势,再加上有证据表明,采用更多经验支持的实践的项目对青年参与者产生了更积极的影响,促使人们越来越关注如何在指导项目中推广更广泛地使用循证实践标准。为了描述和更好地理解实施推荐标准的努力,我们研究了一个由国家倡导组织赞助的多层次倡议,在这个倡议中,它的州级附属机构通过结构化的质量改进过程指导当地的指导计划。具体地说,我们检查了指导项目员工以及负责在实施变革过程中支持指导项目的州级附属机构员工对变革的组织准备情况。对44名员工进行深度定性访谈的分析表明,项目和支持附属机构通常具有很高的积极性,并致力于变革过程。然而,由于这种热情并不总是伴随着进行方案变更所需的资源,因此工作人员对变更效力的看法更加衡量,并注意到削弱实施过程的相应挑战。讨论了这些发现对实践和未来研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to presenting innovative, rigorous original research on social problems, intervention programs, and policies. By creating a venue for the timely dissemination of empirical findings and advances in research methods, JSSWR seeks to strengthen the rigor of social work research and advance the knowledge in social work and allied professions and disciplines. Special emphasis is placed on publishing findings on the effectiveness of social and health services, including public policies and practices. JSSWR publishes an array of perspectives, research approaches, and types of analyses that advance knowledge useful for designing social programs, developing innovative public policies, and improving social work practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信