KONSEPTUALISASI METAFORA DALAM RUBRIK OPINI HARIAN FAJAR; KAJIAN SEMANTIK KOGNITIF

Regi Silvania, S. Syahruddin, Anzar Anzar
{"title":"KONSEPTUALISASI METAFORA DALAM RUBRIK OPINI HARIAN FAJAR; KAJIAN SEMANTIK KOGNITIF","authors":"Regi Silvania, S. Syahruddin, Anzar Anzar","doi":"10.24176/kredo.v5i2.6486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is a type of qualitative descriptive research that aims to find out the conceptualization of metaphors in the Fajar Daily opinion rubric in 2021 through Cognitive Semantic Studies. The source of the research data was taken from the Fajar Daily opinion rubric. Data collection techniques used are documentation techniques, reading and note-taking techniques, and intuition techniques. Data analysis techniques used in this study, namely identifying sentences containing conceptual metaphors, classifying data based on existing problems, analyzing data by describing in detail the problems contained in the data that has been collected, and presenting the results of data analysis by describing the results of the analysis. by using a formulation that will be poured in written form using ordinary words. Based on the analysis conducted, it shows that in the two-week edition of Fajar Daily's opinion rubric in March 2021 found 3 types of metaphors and 27 metaphorical words, namely (1) structural metaphors with 5 data, (2) orientational metaphors with 7 data, and (3 ) ontological metaphor as many as 15 data. The results of this study indicate that ontology metaphors are more dominant in the writing of opinion rubrics compared to structural and orientational metaphors.","PeriodicalId":34413,"journal":{"name":"Kredo Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kredo Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v5i2.6486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is a type of qualitative descriptive research that aims to find out the conceptualization of metaphors in the Fajar Daily opinion rubric in 2021 through Cognitive Semantic Studies. The source of the research data was taken from the Fajar Daily opinion rubric. Data collection techniques used are documentation techniques, reading and note-taking techniques, and intuition techniques. Data analysis techniques used in this study, namely identifying sentences containing conceptual metaphors, classifying data based on existing problems, analyzing data by describing in detail the problems contained in the data that has been collected, and presenting the results of data analysis by describing the results of the analysis. by using a formulation that will be poured in written form using ordinary words. Based on the analysis conducted, it shows that in the two-week edition of Fajar Daily's opinion rubric in March 2021 found 3 types of metaphors and 27 metaphorical words, namely (1) structural metaphors with 5 data, (2) orientational metaphors with 7 data, and (3 ) ontological metaphor as many as 15 data. The results of this study indicate that ontology metaphors are more dominant in the writing of opinion rubrics compared to structural and orientational metaphors.
每日观点概念化中的隐喻;认知语义研究
本研究是一种定性描述性研究,旨在通过认知语义研究找出2021年Fajar Daily opinion标题中隐喻的概念化。研究数据来源于Fajar Daily的观点标题。使用的数据收集技术包括文档技术、阅读和笔记技术以及直觉技术。本研究使用的数据分析技术,即识别包含概念隐喻的句子,根据存在的问题对数据进行分类,通过详细描述收集到的数据中包含的问题来分析数据,通过描述分析结果来呈现数据分析结果。通过使用一种公式,这种公式将用普通的词汇以书面形式表达出来。通过分析发现,在2021年3月为期两周的《法贾尔日报意见篇》中,发现了三种隐喻类型和27个隐喻词,即(1)结构隐喻5个数据,(2)定向隐喻7个数据,(3)本体隐喻多达15个数据。本研究结果表明,本体论隐喻比结构隐喻和定向隐喻在意见标题写作中更占优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信